The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Special Section

Dissonance Between Parent‐Selected Bedtimes and Young Children's Circadian Physiology Influences Nighttime Settling Difficulties

Monique K. LeBourgeois

Corresponding Author

Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University

Address correspondence to Monique K. LeBourgeois, Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado at Boulder, 354 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309; e‐mail:

monique.lebourgeois@colorado.edu

Search for more papers by this author
Kenneth P. Wright Jr.

Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder

Search for more papers by this author
Hannah B. LeBourgeois

Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder

Search for more papers by this author
Oskar G. Jenni

Child Development Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich

Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 November 2013
Cited by: 10

ABSTRACT

Nighttime settling difficulties (i.e., bedtime resistance, sleep‐onset delay) occur in about 25% of young children and are associated with attentional, behavioral, and emotional problems. We examined whether the timing of internal (endogenous) circadian melatonin phase (i.e., dim light melatonin onset; DLMO) and its relationship with parent‐selected bedtimes were related to nighttime settling behaviors. Fourteen regularly napping preschoolers (8 females; 30–36 months) participated in a 6‐day protocol (parent‐report of nighttime settling, actigraphic assessment of sleep onset latency, evening salivary DLMO). Average DLMO clock time was 07:40 p.m. ± 00:48 minutes, occurring 29 minutes ± 32 minutes prior to bedtime (lights‐out). Children with later DLMOs had longer sleep‐onset latencies (r  =  .62) and poorer success in falling asleep (r  =  −.59). Children whose bedtimes were closer to their DLMO had longer sleep‐onset latencies (r  =  .72) and increased bedtime resistance (r  =  −.54). We conclude that dissonance between parent‐selected bedtimes and children's circadian physiology may contribute to the development of nighttime settling difficulties in early childhood.

Number of times cited: 10

  • , Sleep Tight, Act Right: Negative Affect, Sleep and Behavior Problems During Early Childhood, Child Development, 89, 2, (e42-e59), (2017).
  • , Parenting of Infants and Toddlers, Handbook of Parenting and Child Development Across the Lifespan, 10.1007/978-3-319-94598-9_26, (585-607), (2018).
  • , The influence of chronotype in the daily lives of young children, Chronobiology International, 33, 3, (268), (2016).
  • , Bedtime and evening light exposure influence circadian timing in preschool-age children: A field study, Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms, 1, 2, (27), (2016).
  • , Sleep and behavior of preschool children under typical and nap-promoted conditions, Sleep Health, 2, 1, (35), (2016).
  • , Sleep quality among internally displaced Georgian adolescents and population-based controls, Journal of Child Health Care, 20, 3, (384), (2016).
  • , Sleep Hygiene Practices and Bedtime Resistance in Low-Income Preschoolers: Does Temperament Matter?, Behavioral Sleep Medicine, 13, 5, (412), (2015).
  • , Associations of chronotype with social jetlag and behavioral problems in preschool children, Chronobiology International, 32, 8, (1101), (2015).
  • , The Timing of the Circadian Clock and Sleep Differ between Napping and Non-Napping Toddlers, PLOS ONE, 10, 4, (e0125181), (2015).
  • , Chronotype is associated with the timing of the circadian clock and sleep in toddlers, Journal of Sleep Research, 23, 4, (397), (2014).