Analogical Reasoning in the Classroom: Insights From Cognitive Science
ABSTRACT
Applying knowledge from one context to another is a notoriously difficult problem, both for children and adults, but lies at the heart of educational endeavors. Analogical reasoning is a cognitive underpinning of the ability to notice and draw similarities across contexts. Reasoning by analogy is especially challenging for students, who must transfer in the context‐rich and often high‐pressure settings of classrooms. In this brief article, we explore how best to facilitate children's analogical reasoning, with the aim of providing practical suggestions for classroom instruction. We first discuss what is known about the development and neurological underpinnings of analogical reasoning, and then review research directly relevant to supporting analogical reasoning in classroom contexts. We conclude with concrete suggestions for educators that may foster their students' spontaneous analogical reasoning and thereby enhance scholastic achievement.
Number of times cited: 14
- Kelsey K. Will, Andalusia Masad, Haley A. Vlach and Panayiota Kendeou, The effects of refutation texts on generating explanations, Learning and Individual Differences, 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.12.002, 69, (108-115), (2019).
- Kelly S. Mix, Linda B. Smith and Sandra Crespo, Leveraging Relational Learning Mechanisms to Improve Place Value Instruction, Constructing Number, 10.1007/978-3-030-00491-0_5, (87-121), (2018).
- Nora S. Newcombe, Three Kinds of Spatial Cognition, Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, (1-31), (2018).
- Wendy Martin, Megan Silander and Sarah Rutter, Digital games as sources for science analogies: Learning about energy through play, Computers & Education, 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.002, (2018).
- , Effects of Instructional Guidance and Sequencing of Manipulatives and Written Symbols on Second Graders’ Numeration Knowledge, Education Sciences, 7, 2, (52), (2017).
- Wilma C.M. Resing, Merel Bakker, Christine M.E. Pronk and Julian G. Elliott, Progression paths in children’s problem solving: The influence of dynamic testing, initial variability, and working memory, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 153, (83), (2017).
- Lindsey E. Richland, Kreshnik Nasi Begolli, Nina Simms, Rebecca R. Frausel and Emily A. Lyons, Supporting Mathematical Discussions: the Roles of Comparison and Cognitive Load, Educational Psychology Review, 29, 1, (41), (2017).
- Erin Jones Higgins, The Complexities of Learning Categories Through Comparisonsa, , 10.1016/bs.plm.2016.11.002, (43-77), (2017).
- Denis Dumas, Relational Reasoning in Science, Medicine, and Engineering, Educational Psychology Review, 29, 1, (73), (2017).
- Norbert M. Seel, Model-based learning: a synthesis of theory and research, Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 4, (931), (2017).
- Haley A. Vlach and Nigel Noll, Talking to children about science is harder than we think: characteristics and metacognitive judgments of explanations provided to children and adults, Metacognition and Learning, 11, 3, (317), (2016).
- Nicole M. Scott, Arthur Leuthold, Maria D. Sera and Apostolos P. Georgopoulos, Differential neural activity patterns for spatial relations in humans: a MEG study, Experimental Brain Research, 10.1007/s00221-015-4467-6, 234, 2, (429-441), (2015).
- Douglas B. Markant, Azzurra Ruggeri, Todd M. Gureckis and Fei Xu, Enhanced Memory as a Common Effect of Active Learning, Mind, Brain, and Education, 10, 3, (142-152), (2016).
- Nora S Newcombe, Thinking spatially in the science classroom, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, (1), (2016).
