Talking Shape: Parental Language With Electronic Versus Traditional Shape Sorters
ABSTRACT
As the traditional toys of the past are quickly being replaced with electronically “enhanced” toys, it is important to understand how these changes impact parent–child interactions, especially in light of the evidence that the richness and variety of these interactions have long‐term effects on diverse areas of cognition (Hart & Risley, 1995). Here, we compared the quantity and quality of the language children hear during play with either a traditional (nonelectronic) or an electronic shape sorter designed to teach children about geometric shapes. Spatial toys and spatial language, in particular, were explored since recent work has established that parents' use of spatial language links to children's short‐ and long‐term performance on spatial tasks (Pruden, Levine, & Huttenlocher, 2011), and that spatial skills are relevant to success in learning mathematics and science (Newcombe, 2010). Traditional toys prompted more parental spatial language and more varied overall language than did electronic toys.
Number of times cited: 11
- Megan G. Lorenz and Jodie M. Plumert, Mother–child communication about relative proximity to a landmark: What role does prototypicality play?, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.004, 178, (41-59), (2019).
- Ariel Ho, Joanne Lee, Eileen Wood, Samantha Kassies and Carissa Heinbuck, Tap, swipe, and build: Parental spatial input during iPad® and toy play, Infant and Child Development, 27, 1, (2017).
- G.E. Baykal, I. Veryeri Alaca, A.E. Yantaç and T. Göksun, A review on complementary natures of tangible user interfaces (TUIs) and early spatial learning, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, (2018).
- , REFERENCES, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 82, 1, (110-125), (2017).
- Jennifer M. Zosh, Sarah Roseberry Lytle, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff and Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Putting the Education Back in Educational Apps: How Content and Context Interact to Promote Learning, Media Exposure During Infancy and Early Childhood, 10.1007/978-3-319-45102-2_17, (259-282), (2016).
- Jihyun Sung, How Young Children and Their Mothers Experience Two Different Types of Toys: A Traditional Stuffed Toy Versus an Animated Digital Toy, Child & Youth Care Forum, (2017).
- Hui Li, Yeh Hsueh, Fuxing Wang, Xuejun Bai, Tao Liu and Li Zhou, Do Young Chinese Children Gain Anthropomorphism after Exposure to Personified Touch-Screen and Board Games?, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, (2017).
- Rebecca A. Dore, Jennifer M. Zosh, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek and Roberta M. Golinkoff, Plugging Into Word Learning: The Role of Electronic Toys and Digital Media in Language Development, Cognitive Development in Digital Contexts, 10.1016/B978-0-12-809481-5.00004-3, (75-91), (2017).
- HeeSun Choi and Jing Feng, Using Video Games to Improve Spatial Skills, Handbook of Research on Serious Games for Educational Applications, 10.4018/978-1-5225-0513-6.ch005, (93-114)
- Ilyse Resnick, Brian N. Verdine, Roberta Golinkoff and Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Geometric toys in the attic? A corpus analysis of early exposure to geometric shapes, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, (358), (2016).
- Silvia B. Lovato and Sandra R. Waxman, Young Children Learning from Touch Screens: Taking a Wider View, Frontiers in Psychology, 7, (2016).
