The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

Educational Neuromyths Among Teachers in Latin America

Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht

Corresponding Author

Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina

Address correspondence to Dr. Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht, Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas St. Suite CSB 301, Charleston, SC 29425; e‐mail:

gleichge@musc.edu

.
Search for more papers by this author
Benjamin Lira Luttges

Centro Iberoamericano de Neurociencia, Educación y Desarrollo Humano—Cerebrum

Search for more papers by this author
Anna Lucia Campos

Centro Iberoamericano de Neurociencia, Educación y Desarrollo Humano—Cerebrum

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 July 2015
Cited by: 8

ABSTRACT

Neuroscientific knowledge has undeniably gained interest among educators worldwide. However, not all “brain facts” believed by teachers are supported by science. This study sought to evaluate the belief in these so‐called neuromyths among 3,451 Latin American teachers. We found that, consistent with prior research among teachers in other geographic areas, teachers in Latin America hold major misconceptions about neuroscience, especially as it relates to factual information about its structure and functioning. Differences across South American nations were observed with moderate and slight effect sizes for general knowledge of the brain and neuromyths, respectively. Teachers working in higher education had slightly superior performance. Teachers at all levels who reported knowing more about the brain, however, were more likely to believe invalid assertions known as neuromyths. These results shed light on trends in the field of education, hoping to encourage the development of strategies aimed at correcting the use of science as it relates to education. The implications regarding teaching practice, policy, and teacher training are discussed.

Number of times cited: 8

  • , Taking an educational psychology course improves neuroscience literacy but does not reduce belief in neuromyths, PLOS ONE, 13, 2, (e0192163), (2018).
  • , Educational Neuroscience, The Wiley Handbook of Teaching and Learning, (175-198), (2018).
  • , Dispelling the Myth: Training in Education or Neuroscience Decreases but Does Not Eliminate Beliefs in Neuromyths, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, (2017).
  • , A critical reflection on neuromyths in moral & character education, Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 20, 3, (51), (2017).
  • , Brain Knowledge and the Prevalence of Neuromyths among Prospective Teachers in Greece, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, (2017).
  • , Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence among Spanish Teachers and an Exploration of Cross-Cultural Variation, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, (2016).
  • , The Prevalence of Educational Neuromyths Among Pre‐Service Special Education Teachers, Mind, Brain, and Education, , (2018).
  • , Neuromyths as a Challenge and Opportunity for the Learning and Teaching of Neuroscience, Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 10.30703/cije.457302, 7, 4, (483-494), (2018).