The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

How Do We Choose Among Strategies to Accomplish Cognitive Tasks? Evidence From Behavioral and Event‐Related Potential Data in Arithmetic Problem Solving

Julien Taillan

Aix‐Marseille University and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)

Search for more papers by this author
Stéphane Dufau

Aix‐Marseille University and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)

Search for more papers by this author
Patrick Lemaire

Corresponding Author

Aix‐Marseille University and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)

Address correspondence to Patrick Lemaire, LPC‐CNRS & Aix‐Marseille University, Aix‐Marseille University—Case D, 3 Place Victor Hugo, 13331 Marseille, France; e‐mail:

patrick.lemaire@univ‐amu.fr

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 October 2015
Cited by: 4

ABSTRACT

We used event‐related potentials (ERPs) to determine the time course of mechanisms underlying strategy selection. Participants had to select the better strategy on multiplication problems (i.e., 51 × 27) to find approximate products. They could choose between rounding up and rounding down both operands to their nearest decades. Two types of problems were tested, homogeneous problems (e.g., 34 × 61) and heterogeneous problems (e.g., 61 × 36). Homogeneous problems are easier to solve because both operands are close to the lowest or the upper decades. Behavioral data revealed that participants selected the better strategy more often on homogeneous problems. ERPs showed that homogeneous problems elicited more positive cerebral activities than heterogeneous problems in the 0–200 and 800–1,000 ms windows, and more negative cerebral activities than heterogeneous problems in the 400–600 ms window. These findings have important theoretical implications for our understanding of the mechanisms underlying strategy selection.

Number of times cited: 4

  • , The Sources of Sequential Modulations of Control Processes in Arithmetic Strategies: A Magnetoencephalography Study, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29, 6, (1033), (2017).
  • , Aging, rule-violation checking strategies, and strategy combination: An EEG study in arithmetic, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 120, (23), (2017).
  • , What does EEG tell us about arithmetic strategies? A review, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 106, (115), (2016).
  • , Effects of problem presentation durations on arithmetic strategies: a study in young and older adults, Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28, 8, (909), (2016).