The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

Learning From Examples Versus Verbal Directions in Mathematical Problem Solving

Hee Seung Lee

Corresponding Author

Department of Education, Yonsei University

Address correspondence to Hee Seung Lee, Department of Education, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei‐ro, Seodaemun‐gu, Seoul, Korea;

E-mail address: hslee00@yonsei.ac.kr

Search for more papers by this author
Jon M. Fincham

Department Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University

Search for more papers by this author
John R. Anderson

Department Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 October 2015
Cited by: 1

ABSTRACT

This event‐related fMRI study investigated the differences between learning from examples and learning from verbal directions in mathematical problem solving and how these instruction types affect the activity of relevant brain regions during instruction and solution periods within problem‐solving trials. We identified distinct neural signatures during the instruction period of trials. While studying examples, greater activation was found in the prefrontal and parietal regions that were known to be involved in mathematical problem solving. In contrast, while studying verbal directions, increased activation was found in motor and visual regions. These differences, however, disappeared during the solution period. During the solution period, participants showed brain activation patterns like those they displayed while studying an example, regardless of which instruction they learned from. The results suggest instruction type becomes irrelevant after students get to an understanding. Educational implications were discussed with regard to example‐based instruction.

Number of times cited: 1

  • , Learning Problem‐Solving Rules as Search Through a Hypothesis Space, Cognitive Science, 40, 5, (1036-1079), (2015).