The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Research Article

Does (Non‐)Meaningful Sensori‐Motor Engagement Promote Learning With Animated Physical Systems?

Wim T. J. L. Pouw

Corresponding Author

Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam

Address correspondence to Wim T. J. L. Pouw, Department of Social Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands; e‐mail:

pouw@fsw.eur.nl

.
Search for more papers by this author
Charly Eielts

Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam

Search for more papers by this author
Tamara van Gog

Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam

Department of Education, Utrecht University

Search for more papers by this author
Rolf A. Zwaan

Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam

Search for more papers by this author
Fred Paas

Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam

Early Start Research Institute, University of Wollongong

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 July 2016
Cited by: 1

[Correction added on 22 July 2016, after first online publication: the article category has been changed from “Original Articles” to “Research Articles”.]

ABSTRACT

Previous research indicates that sensori‐motor experience with physical systems can have a positive effect on learning. However, it is not clear whether this effect is caused by mere bodily engagement or the intrinsically meaningful information that such interaction affords in performing the learning task. We investigated (N = 74), through the use of a Wii Balance Board, whether different forms of physical engagement that was either meaningfully, non‐meaningfully, or minimally related to the learning content would be beneficial (or detrimental) to learning about the workings of seesaws from instructional animations. The results were inconclusive, indicating that motoric competency on lever problem solving did not significantly differ between conditions, nor were response speed and transfer performance affected. These findings suggest that adult's implicit and explicit knowledge about physical systems is stable and not easily affected by (contradictory) sensori‐motor experiences. Implications for embodied learning are discussed.

Number of times cited: 1

  • , Measuring Cognitive Load in Embodied Learning Settings, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, (2017).