Volume 43, Issue 5 p. 437-443
ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY

Stepwise approach to induce infrequent premature ventricular complex using bolus isoproterenol and epinephrine infusion

Yasutoshi Shinoda MD

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yuki Komatsu MD, PhD

Corresponding Author

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

Correspondence

Yuki Komatsu, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1‐1‐1 Tennodai, Tsukuba 305‐8575, Japan.

Email: yk.komat@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author
Akihiko Nogami MD, PhD

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Miyako Igarashi MD, PhD

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hiro Yamasaki MD, PhD

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yukio Sekiguchi MD, PhD

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Kazutaka Aonuma MD, PhD

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Masaki Ieda MD, PhD

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 March 2020
Citations: 1

Abstract

Background

Paucity of a premature ventricular complex (PVC) during ablation procedures may occur and be associated with a lower success rate. Isoproterenol (ISP) injections are commonly used to induce PVC; however, the induced tachycardia sometimes prevents the appearance of PVC. Epinephrine (EPI) administration may be an alternative strategy to induce PVC due to its smaller effect on heart rate (HR). This study sought to examine the electrophysiological impact of EPI injection, with a stepwise induction protocol, for infrequent intraprocedural PVC.

Methods

We studied 78 consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation of idiopathic frequent PVC. If no PVC was observed at the beginning of the procedure, ISP (10 µg) was injected. If clinical PVC was not induced by ISP administration, EPI (10 µg) was injected.

Results

Of 18 patients without PVC at baseline, ISP injection induced PVC in five patients. Of the remaining 13 patients, EPI injection successfully induced PVC in seven patients (53%). The maximum HR and increments of HR after EPI injection were significantly lower than those after ISP injection (99 ± 15 vs 137 ± 15 bpm, P = .001; 22 ± 10 vs 53 ± 12 bpm, P < .001, respectively). There were no complications related to the induction protocol.

Conclusion

EPI injection following ISP injection is an effective and safe stepwise approach for the induction of infrequent PVC in the electrophysiology laboratory. It is hypothesized that α‐ and β‐adrenergic receptor stimulation by EPI injections, with reduced HR acceleration compared to that with ISP injections, may result in the successful induction of PVC.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.