The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Journal list menu

Article

The Concept of Intersectionality in Feminist Theory

Anna Carastathis

Corresponding Author

California State University, Los Angeles

Correspondence: Department of Philosophy, California State University, Los Angeles, 5151 State University Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90032‐8114, USA. Email: E-mail address:acarast@calstatela.edu or E-mail address:acarastathis@gmail.com.
Search for more papers by this author
First published: 7 April 2014
Cited by: 17

Abstract

In feminist theory, intersectionality has become the predominant way of conceptualizing the relation between systems of oppression which construct our multiple identities and our social locations in hierarchies of power and privilege. The aim of this essay is to clarify the origins of intersectionality as a metaphor, and its theorization as a provisional concept in Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw's work, followed by its uptake and mainstreaming as a paradigm by feminist theorists in a period marked by its widespread and rather unquestioned – if, at times, superficial and inattentive – usage. I adduce four analytic benefits of intersectionality as a research paradigm: simultaneity, complexity, irreducibility, and inclusivity. Then, I gesture at some critiques of intersectionality advanced in the last few years, during which the concept has increasingly come under scrutiny.

Number of times cited: 17

  • , , Higher Education in Ethiopia, (185)
  • , A Feminist Posthumanist Multispecies Ethnography for Educational Studies, Educational Studies, (1)
  • , Visibility patterns of gendered ageism in the media buzz: a study of the representation of gender and age over three decades, Feminist Media Studies, 18, 1, (77)
  • , Intersectional feminism for the environmental studies and sciences: looking inward and outward, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
  • , From interacting systems to a system of divisions, European Journal of Social Theory, 20, 4, (455)
  • , Who else are they? Conceptualizing intersectionality for childhood and youth research, Children's Geographies, 15, 1, (23)
  • , INCREASING THE VERACITY OF IMPLICITLY BIASED RANKINGS, Episteme, 14, 04, (499)
  • , When ‘Angelino’ squirrels don’t eat nuts: a feminist posthumanist politics of consumption across southern California, Gender, Place & Culture, 24, 6, (753)
  • , Social movements, Philosophy Compass, 11, 10, (580-590), (2016).
  • , , Intersectionality and LGBT Activist Politics, (1)
  • , Sex in troubled times: moral panic, polyamory and freedom in north-west Namibia, Anthropology Southern Africa, 39, 1, (31)
  • , , The Digital Transformation of the Public Sphere, (363)
  • , Executive Function, Disability, and Agency, Res Philosophica, 93, 4, (767)
  • , Religious Agency and the Limits of Intersectionality, Hypatia, 30, 4, (657-674), (2015).
  • , Prevalence of Self-Care and Ambulatory Disability in Baby Boom and Generation-X Birth-Cohorts by Intersectional Markers of Social Stratification, Race and Social Problems, 7, 4, (257)
  • , Professional Privilege, Ethics and Pedagogy, Ethics and Social Welfare, 9, 3, (225)
  • , In and out of the cross-cultural classroom closet: negotiating queer teacher identity and culturally diverse cohorts in an Australian university, Higher Education Research & Development, 34, 4, (709)