Volume 35, Issue 2
ARTICLE

Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians

First published: 06 June 2013
Citations: 117

Abstract

One explanation for the dearth of women in elected office is that voters stereotype candidates based on their gender. Research in this vein often assumes that female candidates will be stereotyped similarly to women (e.g., as compassionate) and measures stereotypes as such. We question this assumption, proposing instead that female politicians constitute a subtype—a new stereotypical category with its own qualities—of the broader group of women. We compare the content of female politician stereotypes to other relevant comparison groups including politicians, male politicians, and female professionals. Using a classic methodology to determine stereotype content (Katz & Braly, 1933), we find that female politicians do not share the qualities that are ascribed to women (e.g., warm, empathetic). Our results show that female politicians seem to be “losing” on male stereotypical qualities while also not having any advantage on qualities typical of women. The content of female politician stereotypes is nebulous and lacks clarity in comparison to all other groups examined. We discuss implications for the future measurement of politician stereotypes.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 117

  • Sexism predicts favorability of women in the 2020 democratic primary… and men?, Electoral Studies, 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102184, (102184), (2020).
  • Introduction to Women's Political Involvement in the 100 Years since the Nineteenth Amendment, PS: Political Science & Politics, 10.1017/S1049096520000347, 53, 3, (465-469), (2020).
  • , The Qualifications Gap, 10.1017/9781108864503, (2020).
  • Gubernatorial Elections and Coattail Effects of Women Candidates, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 10.1080/1554477X.2020.1805268, (1), (2020).
  • Gender at Work Across Nations: Men and Women Working in Male‐Dominated and Female‐Dominated Occupations are Differentially Associated with Agency and Communion, Journal of Social Issues, 10.1111/josi.12390, 76, 3, (484-511), (2020).
  • Is there cross-national evidence that voters prefer men as party leaders? No, Electoral Studies, 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102209, 67, (102209), (2020).
  • Polls and Elections: Did Character Count? Candidate Traits and the 2016 Presidential Vote, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 10.1111/psq.12636, 50, 3, (666-689), (2020).
  • Stereotyping Women in Powerful Positions, A Feminist Reading of China’s Digital Public Sphere, 10.1007/978-3-030-59969-0, (105-123), (2020).
  • He Said, She Said: The Gender Double Bind in Legislator–Constituent Communication, Politics & Gender, 10.1017/S1743923X19000862, (1-24), (2020).
  • Gender-Trait and Ethnic Biases in Russian Regions: Ethnic Integration, Regional Economies, and Women in Local Politics, Politics & Gender, 10.1017/S1743923X2000001X, (1-26), (2020).
  • Does the Context Matter for the Prevalence of Political Gender Stereotypes? An Experimental Study in Flanders (Belgium) and Slovakia, Representation, 10.1080/00344893.2019.1710859, (1-18), (2020).
  • Do Female Politicians Face Stronger Backlash for Corruption Allegations? Evidence from Survey-Experiments in Brazil and Mexico, Political Behavior, 10.1007/s11109-020-09602-9, (2020).
  • The psychology of maternal politics: priming and framing effects of candidates’ appeals to motherhood, Politics, Groups, and Identities, 10.1080/21565503.2020.1748068, (1-22), (2020).
  • A Tale of Two Women: A Comparative Gendered Media Analysis of UK Prime Ministers Margaret Thatcher and Theresa May, Parliamentary Affairs, 10.1093/pa/gsaa008, (2020).
  • Just Locker Room Talk? Explicit Sexism and the Impact of the Access Hollywood Tape on Electoral Support for Donald Trump in 2016, Political Communication, 10.1080/10584609.2020.1753867, (1-27), (2020).
  • Stereotypes, Who to Blame? Exploring Individual-Level Determinants of Flemish Voters’ Political Gender Stereotypes, Political Studies, 10.1177/0032321720924808, (003232172092480), (2020).
  • Post-reform gender politics: how do Chinese Internet users portray Theresa May on Zhihu , Feminist Media Studies, 10.1080/14680777.2020.1788110, (1-18), (2020).
  • What’s in a name? An experimental test of marital name change on perceptions of female political candidates, The Social Science Journal, 10.1080/03623319.2020.1782636, (1-18), (2020).
  • Partisanship, sexuality, and perceptions of candidates, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 10.1080/17457289.2019.1711099, (1-25), (2020).
  • Toxic White masculinity, post-truth politics and the COVID-19 infodemic, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10.1177/1367549420944934, (136754942094493), (2020).
  • Let’s Talk About Sexism : The Differential Effects of Gender Discrimination on Liberal and Conservative Women’s Political Engagement , American Politics Research, 10.1177/1532673X20939503, (1532673X2093950), (2020).
  • More Than Just Gender: Exploring Contextual Influences on Media Bias of Political Candidates, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 10.1177/1940161220912694, (194016122091269), (2020).
  • Gender, Sex, and the Role of Stereotypes in Evaluations of Hillary Clinton and the 2016 Presidential Candidates, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 10.1080/1554477X.2020.1731280, (1-25), (2020).
  • The Importance of Candidate Sex and Partisan Preference over Time: A Multiday Study of Voter Decision Making, The Journal of Politics, 10.1086/708340, (000-000), (2020).
  • Gendered News Coverage and Women as Heads of Government, Political Communication, 10.1080/10584609.2020.1784326, (1-19), (2020).
  • Women’s Representation and the Gendered Pipeline to Power, American Political Science Review, 10.1017/S0003055420000404, (1-12), (2020).
  • Resisting Marginalization: Black Women’s Political Ambition and Agency, PS: Political Science & Politics, 10.1017/S1049096520000554, (1-5), (2020).
  • Gender and Political Leadership in a Time of COVID, Politics & Gender, 10.1017/S1743923X2000029X, (1-8), (2020).
  • “I feel your pain”: The effect of displaying empathy on political candidate evaluation, Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1292, 8, 2, (767-787), (2020).
  • Source Credibility, The Psychology of Micro-Targeted Election Campaigns, 10.1007/978-3-030-22145-4, (103-133), (2019).
  • Explaining Consumer Choice Of Low Carbon Footprint Goods Using The Behavioral Spillover Effect In German-Speaking Countries, Journal of Cleaner Production, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.270, (2019).
  • Stereotype Threat und Politisches Wissen, Wahrnehmung – Persönlichkeit – Einstellungen, 10.1007/978-3-658-21216-2, (143-172), (2019).
  • The Application of Social Role Theory to the Study of Gender in Politics, Political Psychology, 10.1111/pops.12573, 40, S1, (173-213), (2019).
  • Naming Names: The Impact of Supreme Court Opinion Attribution on Citizen Assessment of Policy Outcomes, Law & Society Review, 10.1111/lasr.12401, 53, 2, (353-385), (2019).
  • Voter reactions to candidate background characteristics depend on candidate policy positions, Electoral Studies, 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102066, 61, (102066), (2019).
  • Race to the top: using experiments to understand gender bias towards female politicians, Australian Journal of Political Science, 10.1080/10361146.2019.1618438, (1-17), (2019).
  • Political Accountability, Legislator Gender, and the Status Quo Bias, Politics & Gender, 10.1017/S1743923X19000825, (1-37), (2019).
  • Voting Can Be Hard, Information Helps, Urban Affairs Review, 10.1177/1078087419831074, (107808741983107), (2019).
  • What Difference Does It Make? Gendered Campaigning in the 2016 Irish General Election, Politics & Gender, 10.1017/S1743923X19000850, (1-24), (2019).
  • Shifting Standards: How Voters Evaluate the Qualifications of Female and Male Candidates, The Journal of Politics, 10.1086/705817, (000-000), (2019).
  • The electoral success of angels and demons: Big Five, Dark Triad, and performance at the ballot box, Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10.5964/jspp.v7i2.918, 7, 2, (830-862), (2019).
  • TIME for Kids to Learn Gender Stereotypes: Analysis of Gender and Political Leadership in a Common Social Studies Resource for Children, Politics & Gender, 10.1017/S1743923X19000540, (1-22), (2019).
  • Do Voters Prefer Women Judges? Deconstructing the Competitive Advantage in State Supreme Court Elections, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 10.1177/1532440019847771, (153244001984777), (2019).
  • A Feminine Advantage? Delineating the Effects of Feminine Trait and Feminine Issue Messages on Evaluations of Female Candidates, Politics & Gender, 10.1017/S1743923X19000084, (1-21), (2019).
  • Bargain Shopping: How Candidate Sex Lowers the Cost of Voting, Politics & Gender, 10.1017/S1743923X19000254, (1-27), (2019).
  • Is She Charismatic or is She Not? Examining Hillary Clinton’s Charismatic Rhetoric During the 2016 Presidential Race, Women's Studies, 10.1080/00497878.2019.1567514, (1-17), (2019).
  • Intersecting campaigns: candidate race, ethnicity, gender and voter evaluations, Politics, Groups, and Identities, 10.1080/21565503.2019.1584752, (1-25), (2019).
  • Is she still ‘the legendary Jewish mother’? a comparative look at Golda Meir’s and Tzipi Livni’s election campaign coverage in the Israeli press, Israel Affairs, 10.1080/13537121.2019.1561177, (1-23), (2019).
  • A visual analysis of gender stereotypes in campaign advertising, Politics, Groups, and Identities, 10.1080/21565503.2019.1637353, (1-18), (2019).
  • “I Didn’t Lie, I Misspoke”: Voters’ Responses to Questionable Campaign Claims, Journal of Experimental Political Science, 10.1017/XPS.2019.18, (1-14), (2019).
  • Direct and indirect effects of prejudice: sexism, information, and voting behavior in political campaigns, Politics, Groups, and Identities, 10.1080/21565503.2019.1632065, (1-20), (2019).
  • Gender, race, and stereotypes in the 2008 presidential primary, Politics, Groups, and Identities, 10.1080/21565503.2019.1629304, (1-24), (2019).
  • Presidents’ Sex and Popularity: Baselines, Dynamics and Policy Performance, British Journal of Political Science, 10.1017/S0007123418000364, (1-21), (2019).
  • Voter Reasoning Bias When Evaluating Statements from Female and Male Political Candidates, Politics & Gender, 10.1017/S1743923X18000302, 15, 02, (310-335), (2018).
  • Women Politicians, Institutions, and Perceptions of Corruption, Comparative Political Studies, 10.1177/0010414018774355, 52, 1, (134-167), (2018).
  • Gender Essentialism and Responses to Candidates’ Messages, Political Psychology, 10.1111/pops.12556, 40, 4, (719-738), (2018).
  • It depends on who you run against: Inter-racial context and Asian American candidates in US elections, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.003, 65, (61-72), (2018).
  • The change we believe in: The role of socioeconomic conditions in evaluations of black political candidates, Electoral Studies, 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.008, 54, (254-260), (2018).
  • A face fit for office? Appearance-based competence inferences in high-information environments, Electoral Studies, 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.007, 54, (248-253), (2018).
  • Inferring Human Traits from Facebook Statuses, Social Informatics, 10.1007/978-3-030-01129-1_11, (167-195), (2018).
  • Two’s a Crowd: Women Candidates in Concurrent Elections, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 10.1080/1554477X.2018.1475790, 39, 3, (257-284), (2018).
  • Women Cabinet Ministers in Highly Visible Posts and Empowerment of Women: Are the Two Related?, Measuring Women’s Political Empowerment across the Globe, 10.1007/978-3-319-64006-8, (229-255), (2018).
  • O efeito contagiante do sucesso feminino: A eleição de prefeitas e o impacto sobre as candidaturas nos próximos pleitos, Latin American Research Review, 10.25222/larr.398, 53, 1, (57-75), (2018).
  • Mobilizing Sexism: The Interaction of Emotion and Gender Attitudes in the 2016 US Presidential Election, Public Opinion Quarterly, 10.1093/poq/nfy003, 82, S1, (799-821), (2018).
  • Identity-motivated reasoning: Biased judgments regarding political leaders and their actions, Cognition, 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.009, (2018).
  • Political Gender Stereotypes in a List-PR System with a High Share of Women MPs: Competent Men versus Leftist Women?, Political Research Quarterly, 10.1177/1065912918761009, 71, 4, (788-800), (2018).
  • Feminine-sounding names and electoral performance, Electoral Studies, 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.06.004, 55, (54-61), (2018).
  • The Southern Accent as a Heuristic in American Campaigns and Elections, American Politics Research, 10.1177/1532673X18755655, 46, 6, (1065-1093), (2018).
  • When Common Identities Decrease Trust: An Experimental Study of Partisan Women, American Journal of Political Science, 10.1111/ajps.12366, 62, 3, (610-622), (2018).
  • Is Sexism for White People? Gender Stereotypes, Race, and the 2016 Presidential Election, Political Behavior, 10.1007/s11109-018-9446-8, (2018).
  • Running Local: Gender Stereotyping and Female Candidates in Local Elections, Urban Affairs Review, 10.1177/1078087418770807, (107808741877080), (2018).
  • Negative Effects of Calling Attention to Female Political Candidates’ Attractiveness, Journal of Political Marketing, 10.1080/15377857.2017.1411859, (1-27), (2018).
  • The Effects of Partisan Trespassing Strategies Across Candidate Sex, Political Behavior, 10.1007/s11109-018-9475-3, (2018).
  • Self-presentation and counterstereotypic gender strategies in social media campaigning: An example from Taiwan's presidential election, Journal of Information and Telecommunication, 10.1080/24751839.2018.1536365, (1-20), (2018).
  • Ideology and Gender in U.S. House Elections, Political Behavior, 10.1007/s11109-018-9501-5, (2018).
  • The Contingent Effects of Candidate Sex on Voter Choice, Political Behavior, 10.1007/s11109-018-9464-6, (2018).
  • Do voters prefer gender stereotypic candidates? evidence from a conjoint survey experiment in Japan, Political Science Research and Methods, 10.1017/psrm.2018.41, (1-16), (2018).
  • Political Leadership in the Media: Gender Bias in Leader Stereotypes during Campaign and Routine Times, British Journal of Political Science, 10.1017/S0007123417000795, (1-21), (2018).
  • Sex and corruption: how sexism shapes voters’ responses to scandal, Politics, Groups, and Identities, 10.1080/21565503.2018.1441725, (1-19), (2018).
  • Untangling the Relationship between Partisanship, Gender Stereotypes, and Support for Female Candidates, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 10.1080/1554477X.2016.1268875, 39, 1, (1-25), (2017).
  • Visual Information and Candidate Evaluations: The Influence of Feminine and Masculine Images on Support for Female Candidates, Political Research Quarterly, 10.1177/1065912917738579, 71, 2, (395-407), (2017).
  • Gender Differences in Political Knowledge: Bringing Situation Back In, Journal of Experimental Political Science, 10.1017/XPS.2017.21, 5, 1, (39-55), (2017).
  • Tough Enough for the Job? How Masculinity Predicts Recruitment of City Council Members, American Politics Research, 10.1177/1532673X17729719, 46, 6, (1094-1122), (2017).
  • When the Going Gets Tough: Issue Environments and Gendered Negativity Strategies*, Social Science Quarterly, 10.1111/ssqu.12465, 99, 3, (945-961), (2017).
  • Restoring trust in the police: Why female officers reduce suspicions of corruption, Governance, 10.1111/gove.12281, 31, 1, (143-161), (2017).
  • Politicians Appear More Competent When Using Numerical Rhetoric, Journal of Experimental Political Science, 10.1017/XPS.2017.7, 4, 2, (129-150), (2017).
  • Can experience overcome stereotypes in times of terror threat?, Research & Politics, 10.1177/2053168016688121, 4, 1, (205316801668812), (2017).
  • I Am Woman, Hear Me Tweet! Gender Differences in Twitter Use among Congressional Candidates, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 10.1080/1554477X.2016.1268871, 38, 4, (430-455), (2017).
  • The problem of constitutional legitimation: what the debate on electoral quotas tells us about the legitimacy of decision-making rules in constitutional choice, Constitutional Political Economy, 10.1007/s10602-016-9233-7, 28, 2, (195-208), (2017).
  • References, Women in Leadership 2nd Edition, 10.1108/9781787430631, (487-564), (2017).
  • The elusive measurement of symbolic effects on citizens’ political attitudes: survey experiments as alternative avenues, Politics, Groups, and Identities, 10.1080/21565503.2017.1331856, 5, 3, (494-499), (2017).
  • Stereotypes of Stay-at-Home and Working Mothers, Southern Communication Journal, 10.1080/1041794X.2017.1287214, 82, 2, (57-72), (2017).
  • Postcript, Women Presidents and Prime Ministers in Post-Transition Democracies, 10.1057/978-1-137-48240-2, (277-286), (2017).
  • Against a ‘Dependent Interpretation’ of Democracy. What the Debate on Electoral Quotas Reveals About the Legitimacy of Decision-Making Rules, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.3338073, (2017).
  • Frozen in Time: How Disney Gender-Stereotypes Its Most Powerful Princess, Social Sciences, 10.3390/socsci6020038, 6, 2, (38), (2017).
  • Political experience and the intersection between race and gender, Politics, Groups, and Identities, 10.1080/21565503.2017.1354036, (1-24), (2017).
  • Women’s Ideals for Masculinity Across Social Contexts: Patriarchal Agentic Masculinity is Valued in Work, Family, and Romance but Communal Masculinity in Friendship, Sex Roles, 10.1007/s11199-017-0772-9, (2017).
  • Corruption in Latin America, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10.1177/1948550617729884, (194855061772988), (2017).
  • Shaping Perceptions of Sarah Palin’s Charisma: Presentations of Palin in the 2008 Presidential Election, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198652, 38, 2, (103-127), (2016).
  • Refusing to know a woman’s place: the causes and consequences of rejecting stereotypes of women politicians in the Americas, Politics, Groups, and Identities, 10.1080/21565503.2016.1198707, 5, 1, (132-151), (2016).
  • See more

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.