Volume 40, Issue S1
ARTICLE

The Application of Social Role Theory to the Study of Gender in Politics

First published: 20 March 2019
Citations: 13

Abstract

Social role theory provides a framework to help understand the complexity of gender in the political sphere. We demonstrate how SRT both helps to explain extant research findings and to generate future research that will help explain the complicated ways in which gender shapes U.S. politics. This article considers two broad categories of behavior: the gendered opinions and engagement of the citizenry and the gendered evaluations of political actors by elites and voters. Within each category, we propose moving beyond the male‐female binary and consider the effects of gender in conjunction with other key political identities, such as race, ethnicity, age, as well as examining the effects of (dis)ability, and class. As well, our work demonstrates how masculinity encompasses the U.S. political system and serves as a backdrop in front of which gender roles shape political behavior, and role incongruity can lead to prejudice. This project lays the groundwork for future work to apply theories from psychology to a gendered analysis of U.S. politics. Through a better understanding of sex, gender, and their combined effects with race and other intersectional identities, we contribute to a broader goal of creating a more inclusive U.S. politics.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 13

  • Essential Work Is Gender Segregated: This Shapes the Gendered Representation of Essential Workers in Political Office, Social Science Quarterly, 10.1111/ssqu.12850, 101, 5, (1827-1833), (2020).
  • 100 Years of Suffrage and Girls Still Struggle to Find their “Fit” in Politics, PS: Political Science & Politics, 10.1017/S1049096520000293, 53, 3, (474-478), (2020).
  • The Psychology of Revolution, Current Opinion in Psychology, 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.004, (2020).
  • The effect of personal values and the roles on representational principles in natural resource management decision-making, Heliyon, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04032, 6, 5, (e04032), (2020).
  • It Takes a Motive: Communal and Agentic Articulated Interest and Candidate Emergence, Political Research Quarterly, 10.1177/1065912920933668, (106591292093366), (2020).
  • Pink‐Collar Representation and Budgetary Outcomes in US States, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 10.1111/lsq.12286, 0, 0, (2020).
  • Experience with discrimination, perceptions of difference, and the importance of gender conformity on support for transgender rights, Politics, Groups, and Identities, 10.1080/21565503.2020.1743332, (1-17), (2020).
  • Gender, Sex, and the Role of Stereotypes in Evaluations of Hillary Clinton and the 2016 Presidential Candidates, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 10.1080/1554477X.2020.1731280, (1-25), (2020).
  • Gender Disparities in the Influence of Social Media Advertisements on Buying Decision in Nigeria, Communicatio, 10.1080/02500167.2020.1825100, (1-19), (2020).
  • Gender differences in perceptions of policy advocacy activities among top executive leadership: Focusing on two types of South Korean social work organizations, International Social Work, 10.1177/0020872820962216, (002087282096221), (2020).
  • Public Attitudes on Transgender Military Service: The Role of Gender, Armed Forces & Society, 10.1177/0095327X19861737, (0095327X1986173), (2019).
  • When politicians as a product: Framing impact in decision making through the self‐concept physical of appearance and self‐congruency with the product gender, Journal of Public Affairs, 10.1002/pa.2461, 0, 0, (undefined).
  • Antiwomen But Proquota: Disaggregating Sexism and Support for Gender Quota Policies, Political Psychology, 10.1111/pops.12696, 0, 0, (undefined).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.