Encouraging Local Compliance with Federal Civil Rights Laws: Field Experiments with the National Voter Registration Act
Abstract
Can state officials increase local officials’ compliance with an important federal civil rights law with subtle interventions? The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) requires voter registration services at certain government agencies, but many counties fail to comply with the act. Working with officials in two states, the authors conducted field experiments to determine whether two methods commonly used by state officials increase compliance with the NVRA. Findings show that although the effects of the methods on output were sizable relative to recent performance, agency performance remained poor overall, with many offices continuing their history of registering no voters. The authors also discovered that gains in performance were largest for the offices that had performed best in the past. These findings suggest that while subtle interventions by state officials can produce increased compliance, stronger tactics may be needed to secure implementation of this federal law by local government agents.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 14
- Thessalia Merivaki, Thessalia Merivaki, The Impact of Local-Level Factors on Voter Registration Success, The Administration of Voter Registration, 10.1007/978-3-030-48059-2, (105-127), (2021).
- Thessalia Merivaki, Thessalia Merivaki, How Are Americans Registering to Vote? Beyond the Institutional Supply, The Administration of Voter Registration, 10.1007/978-3-030-48059-2, (77-103), (2021).
- Thessalia Merivaki, Thessalia Merivaki, Gaps in Voter Registration: Ongoing Pressures to Expand the Electorate, The Administration of Voter Registration, 10.1007/978-3-030-48059-2, (27-50), (2021).
- Thessalia Merivaki, Thessalia Merivaki, Election Reform and Voter Registration, The Administration of Voter Registration, 10.1007/978-3-030-48059-2, (1-25), (2021).
- Thessalia Merivaki, Thessalia Merivaki, Opportunities and Challenges for Voter Registration Reform, The Administration of Voter Registration, 10.1007/978-3-030-48059-2, (157-166), (2021).
- Thessalia Merivaki, Daniel A. Smith, Challenges in Voter Registration, The Future of Election Administration, 10.1007/978-3-030-14947-5, (59-82), (2020).
- Jesper Asring Hansen, Lars Tummers, A Systematic Review of Field Experiments in Public Administration, Public Administration Review, 10.1111/puar.13181, 0, 0, (2020).
- Thessalia Merivaki, Who Is Left Out? The Process of Validating Voter Registration Applications, American Politics Research, 10.1177/1532673X20914613, (1532673X2091461), (2020).
- Peter John, Improving Causal Claims in Public Policy through Randomized Designs in the Field, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 10.1080/13876988.2020.1782751, (1-17), (2020).
- Anthony M Bertelli, Norma M. Riccucci, What Is Behavioral Public Administration Good for?, Public Administration Review, 10.1111/puar.13283, 0, 0, (2020).
- Shahidul Hassan, Bradley E. Wright, The Behavioral Public Administration Movement: A Critical Reflection, Public Administration Review, 10.1111/puar.13130, 80, 1, (163-167), (2019).
- Christopher B. Mann, Lisa A. Bryant, If you ask, they will come (to register and vote): Field experiments with state election agencies on encouraging voter registration, Electoral Studies, 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.02.012, (2019).
- Jiannan Wu, Yuqian Yang, Pan Zhang, Liang Ma, Households’ Noncompliance With Resettlement Compensation In Urban China: Toward An Integrated Approach, International Public Management Journal, 10.1080/10967494.2017.1301606, 21, 2, (272-296), (2017).
- Sebastian Jilke, Steven Van de Walle, Soonhee Kim, Generating Usable Knowledge through an Experimental Approach to Public Administration, Public Administration Review, 10.1111/puar.12488, 76, 1, (69-72), (2015).
