Volume 43, Issue 1
Original Article

Combining Inverse Probability Weighting and Multiple Imputation to Improve Robustness of Estimation

Peisong Han

Corresponding Author

Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo

Peisong Han, Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1.

E‐mail: peisonghan@uwaterloo.ca

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 August 2015
Citations: 17

Abstract

Inverse probability weighting (IPW) and multiple imputation are two widely adopted approaches dealing with missing data. The former models the selection probability, and the latter models data distribution. Consistent estimation requires correct specification of corresponding models. Although the augmented IPW method provides an extra layer of protection on consistency, it is usually not sufficient in practice as the true data‐generating process is unknown. This paper proposes a method combining the two approaches in the same spirit of calibration in sampling survey literature. Multiple models for both the selection probability and data distribution can be simultaneously accounted for, and the resulting estimator is consistent if any model is correctly specified. The proposed method is within the framework of estimating equations and is general enough to cover regression analysis with missing outcomes and/or missing covariates. Results on both theoretical and numerical investigation are provided.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 17

  • A multiply robust Mann-Whitney test for non-randomised pretest-posttest studies with missing data, Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, 10.1080/10485252.2020.1736290, (1-22), (2020).
  • Demystifying a class of multiply robust estimators, Biometrika, 10.1093/biomet/asaa026, (2020).
  • Calibration estimation of semiparametric copula models with data missing at random, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 10.1016/j.jmva.2019.02.003, (2019).
  • M-estimation with incomplete and dependent multivariate data, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 10.1016/j.jmva.2019.104569, (104569), (2019).
  • A general framework for quantile estimation with incomplete data, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 10.1111/rssb.12309, 81, 2, (305-333), (2019).
  • Comments on: Deville and Särndal’s calibration: revisiting a 25 years old successful optimization problem, TEST, 10.1007/s11749-019-00682-2, (2019).
  • An Educational Review About Using Cost Data for the Purpose of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, PharmacoEconomics, 10.1007/s40273-019-00771-y, (2019).
  • Multiply robust estimation in nonparametric regression with missing data, Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, 10.1080/10485252.2019.1700254, (1-20), (2019).
  • Regression Analysis with Individual-Specific Patterns of Missing Covariates, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10.1080/07350015.2019.1635486, (1-10), (2019).
  • A unified empirical likelihood approach for testing MCAR and subsequent estimation, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 10.1111/sjos.12351, 46, 1, (272-288), (2018).
  • Effectiveness of certified diabetes educators following pre-approved protocols to redesign diabetes care delivery in primary care: Results of the REMEDIES 4D trial, Contemporary Clinical Trials, 10.1016/j.cct.2017.10.003, 64, (201-209), (2018).
  • Calibration Estimation of Semiparametric Copula Models with Data Missing at Random, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.3029508, (2018).
  • Jackknife empirical likelihood method for multiply robust estimation with missing data, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2018.05.011, 127, (258-268), (2018).
  • Semiparametric estimation in regression with missing covariates using single-index models, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 10.1007/s10463-018-0672-y, (2018).
  • Ensemble Approaches to Estimating the Population Mean with Missing Response, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 10.1111/sjos.12281, 44, 4, (899-917), (2017).
  • Multiple imputation of cognitive performance as a repeatedly measured outcome, European Journal of Epidemiology, 10.1007/s10654-016-0197-8, 32, 1, (55-66), (2016).
  • A fusion of least squares and empirical likelihood for regression models with a missing binary covariate, Science China Mathematics, 10.1007/s11425-016-5156-z, 59, 10, (2027-2036), (2016).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.