Volume 56, Issue 5
Original Article

A comparative study between nonlinear regression and nonparametric approaches for modelling Phalaris paradoxa seedling emergence

J L Gonzalez‐Andujar

Corresponding Author

Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible (CSIC), Córdoba, Spain

Correspondence: J L Gonzalez‐Andujar, Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible (CSIC), Apartado 4084, Cordoba 14080, Spain. Tel: (+34) 957 499220; Fax: (+34) 957 499252; E‐mail: andujar@cica.esSearch for more papers by this author
M Francisco‐Fernandez

Departamento de Matemáticas, Facultad de Informática, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
R Cao

Departamento de Matemáticas, Facultad de Informática, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
M Reyes

Departamento de Matemáticas, Facultad de Informática, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
F Forcella

North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory, USDA‐ARS, Morris, MN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
F Bastida

Departamento de Ciencias Agroforestales, ETSI, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 July 2016
Citations: 6

Summary

Parametric nonlinear regression (PNR) models are used widely to fit weed seedling emergence patterns to soil microclimatic indices. However, such approximation has been questioned, mainly due to several statistical limitations. Alternatively, nonparametric approaches can be used to overcome the problems presented by PNR models. Here, we used an emergence data set of Phalaris paradoxa to compare both approaches. Mean squared error and correlation results indicated higher accuracy for the descriptive ability but similar poor performance for predictive ability of the nonparametric approach in comparison with the PNR approach. These results suggest that our nonparametric cumulative distribution function approach is a valuable alternative to the classical parametric nonlinear regression models to describe complex emergence patterns for P. paradoxa, but not to predict them.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 6

  • Validation of predictive empirical weed emergence models of Abutilon theophrasti Medik based on intercontinental data, Weed Research, 10.1111/wre.12428, 60, 4, (297-302), (2020).
  • Weed Emergence Models, Decision Support Systems for Weed Management, 10.1007/978-3-030-44402-0, (85-116), (2020).
  • Analysis of interval‐grouped data in weed science: The binnednp Rcpp package, Ecology and Evolution, 10.1002/ece3.5448, 9, 19, (10903-10915), (2019).
  • Germination and emergence of Neslia paniculata (L.) Desv., Industrial Crops and Products, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.030, 129, (455-462), (2019).
  • Hydrothermal-time-to-event models for seed germination, European Journal of Agronomy, 10.1016/j.eja.2018.08.011, 101, (129-139), (2018).
  • Germination behaviour of Cenchrus pauciflorus seeds across a range of salinities, Weed Research, 10.1111/wre.12243, 57, 2, (91-100), (2017).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.