By continuing to browse this site, you agree to its use of cookies as described in our Cookie Policy.×

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Cognitive Science

Volume 30, Issue 5
Free Access

Harmony in Linguistic Cognition

Paul Smolensky

Corresponding Author

Cognitive Science Department, Johns Hopkins University

Cognitive Science Department, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218‐2685. E‐mail:

smolensky@jhu.edu

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 February 2010
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_78
Cited by: 11

Abstract

In this article, I survey the integrated connectionist/symbolic (ICS) cognitive architecture in which higher cognition must be formally characterized on two levels of description. At the microlevel, parallel distributed processing (PDP) characterizes mental processing; this PDP system has special organization in virtue of which it can be characterized at the macrolevel as a kind of symbolic computational system. The symbolic system inherits certain properties from its PDP substrate; the symbolic functions computed constitute optimization of a well‐formedness measure called Harmony. The most important outgrowth of the ICS research program is optimality theory (Prince & Smolensky, 1993/2004), an optimization‐based grammatical theory that provides a formal theory of cross‐linguistic typology. Linguistically, Harmony maximization corresponds to minimization of markedness or structural ill‐formedness. Cognitive explanation in ICS requires the collaboration of symbolic and connectionist principles. ICS is developed in detail in Smolensky and Legendre (2006a); this article is a précis of and guide to those volumes.

Number of times cited: 11

  • Shunpeng Zou and Xiaohui Zou, Understanding: How to Resolve Ambiguity, Intelligence Science I, 10.1007/978-3-319-68121-4_36, (333-343), (2017).
    Crossref
  • Alberto Testolin, Ivilin Stoianov, Alessandro Sperduti and Marco Zorzi, Learning Orthographic Structure With Sequential Generative Neural Networks, Cognitive Science, 40, 3, (579-606), (2015).
    Wiley Online Library
  • Eduardo Mizraji and Juan Lin, Modeling spatial–temporal operations with context-dependent associative memories, Cognitive Neurodynamics, 9, 5, (523), (2015).
    Crossref
  • Peter beim Graben and Sabrina Gerth, Geometric Representations for Minimalist Grammars, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 21, 4, (393), (2012).
    Crossref
  • Joe Pater, Weighted Constraints in Generative Linguistics, Cognitive Science, 33, 6, (999-1035), (2009).
    Wiley Online Library
  • Peter beim Graben, Adam Barrett and Harald Atmanspacher, Stability criteria for the contextual emergence of macrostates in neural networks, Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 20, 3, (178), (2009).
    Crossref
  • Paula Fikkert and Helen de Hoop, Language acquisition in optimality theory, Linguistics, 47, 2, (2009).
    Crossref
  • Sabrina Gerth and Peter beim Graben, Unifying syntactic theory and sentence processing difficulty through a connectionist minimalist parser, Cognitive Neurodynamics, 3, 4, (297), (2009).
    Crossref
  • Peter beim Graben and Roland Potthast, Inverse problems in dynamic cognitive modeling, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 19, 1, (015103), (2009).
    Crossref
  • Peter beim Graben, Dimitris Pinotsis, Douglas Saddy and Roland Potthast, Language processing with dynamic fields, Cognitive Neurodynamics, 2, 2, (79), (2008).
    Crossref
  • Peter beim Graben, Sabrina Gerth and Shravan Vasishth, Towards dynamical system models of language-related brain potentials, Cognitive Neurodynamics, 2, 3, (229), (2008).
    Crossref