Volume 82, Issue 4 p. 1341-1403

Land Use Regulation and Welfare

Matthew A. Turner,

Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto, 150 Saint George Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G7; mturner@chass.utoronto.ca

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew Haughwout,

Research and Statistics Group, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 33 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10045, U.S.A.; Andrew.Haughwout@ny.frb.org

Search for more papers by this author
Wilbert van der Klaauw,

Research and Statistics Group, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 33 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10045, U.S.A.; Wilbert.VanDerKlaauw@ny.frb.org

We are grateful to Kailin Clarke and Sarah Stein for excellent research assistance. We thank three anonymous referees and the Editor, Jessica Burley, Carmen Carrion-Flores, Chris Cunningham, Gilles Duranton, Vernon Henderson, Rob McMillan, Christian Redfern, and many conference and seminar participants for helpful comments. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Turner gratefully acknowledges the support of SSHRC, and the support and hospitality of the Paris School of Economics, the Property and Environment Research Center, and the Enaudi Institute for Economics and Finance.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 July 2014
Citations: 85

Abstract

We evaluate the effect of land use regulation on the value of land and on welfare. Our estimates are based on a decomposition of the effects of regulation into three components: an own-lot effect, which reflects the cost of regulatory constraints to the owner of a parcel; an external effect, which reflects the value of regulatory constraints on one's neighbors; a supply effect, which reflects the effect of regulated scarcity of developable land. Using this decomposition, we arrive at a novel strategy for estimating a plausibly causal effect of land use regulation on land value and welfare. This strategy exploits cross-border changes in development, prices, and regulation in regions near municipal borders. Our estimates suggest large negative effects of regulation on the value of land and welfare in these regions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.