Volume 200, Issue 9 p. 526-528
For Debate

Can we learn anything from health care in the United States?

Matthew H R Anstey MB BS, MPH, FCICM,

Corresponding Author

Matthew H R Anstey MB BS, MPH, FCICM

Intensivist

Intensive Care Unit, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA.

Correspondence: matthew.anstey@health.wa.gov.auSearch for more papers by this author
Adam G Elshaug MPH, PhD,

Adam G Elshaug MPH, PhD

Associate Professor and HCF Research Foundation Principal Research Fellow

Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.

Search for more papers by this author
Lesley M Russell BSc(Hons), BA, PhD,

Lesley M Russell BSc(Hons), BA, PhD

Senior Research Fellow

Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.

Search for more papers by this author
Susan Wells MB ChB, MPH, PhD,

Susan Wells MB ChB, MPH, PhD

Senior Lecturer, Health Innovation and Quality Improvement

School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 May 2014
Citations: 1

Summary

  • Some aspects of health care in the United States would be beneficial to Australia and New Zealand, but others should be avoided.
  • Positive aspects, which should be emulated, include:
    • health care reform that is focused on the continuum of care and patient-centred care
    • trials of new models to organise, deliver and pay for health care services, where quality of care is rewarded over quantity of services
    • an integral view of, and strong support for, health services research as a means of evaluating reforms aimed at improving patient outcomes and systems-level efficiencies
    • physician engagement in reforms — for example, participating in the Choosing Wisely initiative, and trialling and implementing new payment models that are not fee-for-service.
  • Negative aspects, which should be avoided, include:
    • increasingly fragmented provider and financing structures (funding provided by state and federal governments, private insurance and out-of-pocket costs) that cause frustration in terms of access and care coordination and increase administrative waste
    • an overemphasis on technological solutions, with insufficient acknowledgment of the importance of addressing value in health care
    • a focus on hospital and doctor-based health care rather than environmental and social inputs into health.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.