The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Free Access

The effectiveness of hygiene procedures for prevention of cross‐contamination from chicken carcases in the domestic kitchen

T. A. Cogan

PHLS Food Microbiology Research Unit (FMRU), Exeter, and

Search for more papers by this author
S. F. Bloomfield

Unilever Research, Port Sunlight, Merseyside, UK

Search for more papers by this author
T. J. Humphrey

PHLS Food Microbiology Research Unit (FMRU), Exeter, and

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 January 2002
Cited by: 113
T.A. Cogan, PHLS FMRU, Church Lane, Heavitree, Exeter, Devon EX2 5AD, UK (e‐mail: t.a.cogan@ex.ac.uk).

Abstract

Thirteen sites in each of 60 domestic kitchens were examined for Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. following the preparation of a chicken for cooking and the application of different hygiene regimes. During food preparation bacteria became widely disseminated to hand and food contact surfaces. Where cleaning was carried out with detergent and hot water using a prescribed routine there was no significant decrease in the frequency of contaminated surfaces. Where hypochlorite was used in addition, a significant reduction in the number of contaminated sites was observed. The study suggests that there is a need to better understand and promote effective hygiene procedures for the domestic kitchen.

Introduction

Foodborne infection remains a significant worldwide problem. Notified infections in England and Wales exceeded 100 000 per annum in 1997 and 1998, although the actual number of infections may be as high as 9 million ( Wheeler et al. 1999 ). A large proportion of such infections arise in the home ( Sheard 1986). Salmonella spp. is found in up to 30%, and Campylobacter in around 90% of chickens on retail sale in England ( Anonymous 1997). Fresh chicken carcasses can contain around 105Campylobacter and lower numbers of Salmonella ( Cason et al. 1997 ). Both bacteria are easily transferred from raw chicken to surfaces ( de Boer & Hahné 1990). Studies have shown that many sites in the kitchen become contaminated when food harbouring indicator bacteria or Salmonella spp. is prepared ( de Wit et al. 1979 ; Zhao et al. 1998 ). This may be an important source of Salmonella and Campylobacter infections in the home.

A number of studies have shown that cleaning using soap and water may not result in decontamination of environmental sites ( Scott et al. 1984 ; Scott & Bloomfield 1993). Disinfectants are effective in reducing the population of micro‐organisms in domestic kitchens ( Josephson et al. 1997 ; Rusin et al. 1998 ), but their efficiency in preventing cross‐contamination during food preparation has not been investigated. The concept of HACCP is increasingly employed to achieve cost‐effective hygiene in food manufacturing and other environments. A similar approach could have benefits in home hygiene ( Griffith et al. 1998 ). This investigation examined the effectiveness of domestic hygiene procedures in preventing the dissemination of Campylobacter and Salmonella spp. via contact surfaces during food preparation in the kitchen.

MATERIALS and METHODS

Chickens

Whole fresh chickens were obtained from retail outlets and given to participants, university students and staff, for the preparation of a meal. Chickens were not preselected on the basis of the presence of the target pathogens. A ≈25‐g piece of neck skin was removed from each chicken and subsequently analysed for the presence of Campylobacter and Salmonella spp. (see below).

Food preparation and cleaning regimes

Sixty participants were allotted to one of three groups and were given a chicken, a dishcloth and a hand towel. Group I was asked to prepare a casserole using a specified procedure, the validity of which as typical food preparation behaviour was established from a preliminary questionaire and behavioural studies with university students. Participants were instructed to unwrap the chicken, rinse it, place it on a chopping board and portion it. The pieces were placed in a dish and water, condiments and spices added. After meal preparation, the kitchens were sampled and the participants allowed to clean in their usual manner. Sites were resampled 3 h later, and the dishcloth and towel removed for examination.

Groups II and III participants were instructed to unwrap the chicken, rinse it and place it on the work surface. They were then asked to transfer it to the chopping board and followed the above procedure. Following this the kitchens were cleaned using a prescribed regime. This involved preparing a bowl of hand‐hot water (approx. 45 °C) containing detergent (0·04% solution). The board, knife and utensils were cleaned in the bowl using the dishcloth. The cloth was rinsed in the soapy water, wrung out and used to clean the work surface, taps, sink, condiments and fridge, cupboard, oven and kitchen door handles. Participants washed their hands. Sampling of target sites then took place.

Group III participants were asked to follow the cleaning procedure prescribed for group II. After rinsing, the cloth was immersed in hypochlorite disinfectant containing 5000 p.p.m. available chlorine (Lever Brothers, Port Sunlight, UK) and wrung out. Using a trigger spray, the hypochlorite disinfectant was applied to all of the cleaned surfaces and sites which were then wiped with the disinfected cloth. A disinfectant contact time of 5 min was allowed before sampling of target sites.

Collection of samples

Sampling sites in the kitchen comprised the chopping board, work surfaces, hands, knife and the sites cleaned during directed cleaning (above). For kitchens in groups II and III, swabs were also taken from the surface on which the chicken was placed before preparation. Sites were swabbed using a cotton swab of ≈ 5cm2 moistened with buffered peptone water (BPW, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) containing 0·05% sodium thiosulphate. The swabs were placed in a 60‐ml container of this medium. Dishcloths and hand towels were collected. Hand towels from group II and III kitchens were not collected as their use was not included in the directed cleaning regime. Samples were stored at 4 °C until analysis.

Microbiological techniques used

On arrival at the laboratory 100 ml BPW was added to the chicken skin, dishcloths and hand towels and the samples macerated for 2 min in a stomacher.

For isolation of Campylobacter, 25 ml of the BPW used to recover organisms from swabs, cloths and chicken samples was added to 25 ml of double‐strength modified Exeter Campylobacter broth ( Humphrey et al. 1995 ) containing 0·05% sodium thiosulphate. The broth was incubated at 37 ± 0·5 °C for 4 h before addition of rifampicin and polymixin B, then incubated for a further 44 h ( Mason et al. 1996 ). The broth was sub‐cultured onto modified cefoperazone charcoal deoxycholate agar (CCDA‐Preston, Oxoid) and plates incubated in a micro‐aerobic atmosphere at 37 ± 0·5 °C for 48 h. Presumptive Campylobacter spp. were identified by a hippurate hydrolysis test and typical motility on microscopy and morphology in Gram‐stained smears.

For isolation of Salmonella the remaining BPW was incubated at 37 ± 0·5 °C for 18–24 h; 100 μl of this culture was added to 10 ml Rappaport–Vassiliadis soya peptone enrichment broth (RVS, Oxoid) and incubated at 41 ± 0·5 °C for 24 h. The broth was subcultured on to xylose lysine deoxycholate agar (XLD, Oxoid) and modified brilliant green agar (mBGA, Oxoid) and the plates incubated at 37 ± 0·5 °C for 24 h. Presumptive salmonellae were confirmed by standard biochemical tests and serotyping.

Laboratory studies of the bactericidal effect of the hypochlorite disinfectant

Whole chickens were screened for Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. as above and kept at 4 °C pending results. Those positive for both organisms were unwrapped and 12 sterile 20‐mm diameter stainless steel disks pressed onto the surface of each and left for 1 min. Two disks were cultured immediately to confirm transfer of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. to the disks by contact. The remaining 10 disks were sprayed on both sides with hypochlorite spray, left for 30 s and then cultured for the above bacteria. This was repeated with hypochlorite contact times of 1, 2 and 5 min.

Statistical analysis of results

In order to examine the effect of the cleaning regimes used, the number of sites in each kitchen positive for either or both of the target organisms after cleaning was recorded and compared with the number of positive sites found before cleaning in group I kitchens. Data were statistically examined using the Wilcoxon test for correlated samples and the Mann–Whitney U‐test for independent samples.

RESULTS and DISCUSSION

Results are given only for kitchens in which a chicken positive for at least one of the target pathogens was prepared. A chicken positive for Campylobacter or Salmonella spp. was prepared in 20 kitchens of each group. The number of chickens that were contaminated with either or both bacteria is shown in Table 1. Sites from which either one or both were isolated were counted as ‘positive’. No kitchens in which a negative chicken was prepared were positive for either bacterium. Campylobacter was more prevalent in the chickens but not this was not significant. Salmonella spp. were isolated from surfaces more frequently than Campylobacter spp. ( Table 1), which correlates with the fact that Salmonella is believed to survive better on dry surfaces than Campylobacter (de Boer & Hahné 1990).

Table 1. Comparison of incidence of contamination of chickens and sample sites with Salmonella and/or Campylobacter. Group I kitchens sampled before and after undirected cleaning. Group II kitchens sampled after directed cleaning with soap and water, group III used additional hypochlorite spray disinfectant
image

Transfer of Campylobacter and Salmonella to surfaces in the kitchen during the preparation of the meal occurred frequently ( Fig. 1). The undirected cleaning in group I was ineffective in removing the pathogens. Campylobacter and/or Salmonella were isolated from 38/220 sites sampled (17·3%). Contamination of sites such as the door handle shows how widely bacteria from food may become disseminated. Campylobacter and/or Salmonella spp. were found in 16/20 kitchens in group I. In a small majority of kitchens (11/20) only one or two sites were found to be contaminated. In two kitchens, however, more than six sites were Campylobacter‐ or Salmonella‐positive.

image

(C)omparison of percentage of sites contaminated in group I kitchens. * Site not tested. Sites positive for ▪Campylobacter, :::□Salmonella, £ both organisms

Analysis of results for group I indicated that the difference between the total number of sites contaminated before and 3 h after cleaning was not significant, despite the fact that the overall isolation rate was reduced to 9·1%. Four kitchens showed an increase in the number of sites contaminated after cleaning. Fewer preparation surfaces were contaminated after cleaning but more positive samples were recovered from the taps, utensils and condiments, indicating that bacteria may have been transferred to these sites during the ‘cleaning’ process. However, only 25% of dishcloths were positive, possibly due to high levels of other species of bacteria on the cloth interfering with the isolation of the target pathogens.

In group II kitchens, in which directed cleaning using detergent and hot water had taken place, 40 of 260 (15·4%) sites were contaminated with either or both pathogens ( Fig. 2). Statistical analysis comparing group II with group I kitchens, sampled before cleaning, indicated that the difference between the total number of sites contaminated was not significant. Fewer chopping boards were contaminated compared with group I kitchens, probably due to the fact that a rinse procedure was specified for cleaning. Sites which had been wiped with the cloth during the directed cleaning process were more frequently contaminated than the same sites sampled before cleaning in group I kitchens. The results indicate this method of cleaning was not effective in removing pathogens and that they were spread around the kitchen on the cloth. This has previously been observed where detergent and water alone are used ( Scott & Bloomfield 1990; Scott & Bloomfield 1993). Contamination was found in 13/20 kitchens in group II, although in seven only one or two sites in each kitchen were contaminated. In four kitchens, however, six or more sites were positive for Salmonella and/or Campylobacter spp.

image

omparison of percentage of sites contaminated in group II and III kitchens. Sites positive for ▪Campylobacter, :::□Salmonella,£ both organisms

The use of hypochlorite disinfectant in addition to detergent and hot water cleaning resulted in a significant decrease in the number of positive sites compared to those found to be contaminated after the use of detergent and water alone (group II kitchens; Fig. 2). Target bacteria were isolated from one site in each of six group III kitchens (2·3%). It is likely that surfaces still contaminated after disinfection were the result of the disinfectant not reaching the bacteria due to limited application. This was supported by the in vitro studies where a hygienic surface (no culturable survivors) could be achieved by contact of the disks with hypochlorite solution for 30 s.

The results of this study show that, during preparation of naturally contaminated food, potential pathogens are frequently spread to hand and food contact surfaces. Food hygiene advice often advocates the use of mechanical removal with soap and water as the most appropriate and effective method for achieving surface hygiene in the domestic kitchen, but the importance of thorough rinsing as an integral part of the process is often not stressed. This study suggests the inadequacy of this procedure. Given the importance of cross‐contamination as a contributory factor in outbreaks of food poisoning ( Roberts 1986), these observations have important public health implications. This study suggests that the use of a thorough cleaning regime involving, where appropriate, the application of an effective disinfectant to contact surfaces after food preparation could have a significant impact in reducing the potential for Salmonella and Campylobacter cross‐contamination from foods in the kitchen.

The study indicates a need to better understand hygiene procedures which are likely to be effective in the domestic setting, and the educational and motivational processes needed to promote such procedures.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr Frieda Jørgensen and Dr Gil Domingue for their advice during this study and Miss Tracy Kramer for her help in the preparation of the manuscript. The authors would also like to acknowledge the financial support of this work by Unilever plc.

    Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 113

    • , Evaluation of Staphylococcus spp. in food and kitchen premises of Campinas, Brazil, Food Control, 84, (463), (2018).
    • , Molecular Characterization and Virulence of Campylobacter jejuni Isolated from Broiler Chickens, International Journal of Poultry Science, 10.3923/ijps.2018.499.506, 17, 10, (499-506), (2018).
    • , Routes of Transmission in the Food Chain, Foodborne Diseases, 10.1016/B978-0-12-385007-2.00003-6, (65-103), (2017).
    • , Cross-Contamination and Biofilm Formation by Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis on Various Cutting Boards, Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, (2017).
    • , Resistance to tetracycline in Escherichia coli isolates from poultry meat: epidemiology, policy and perspective, World's Poultry Science Journal, 73, 02, (409), (2017).
    • , Consumer Poultry Handling Behavior in the Grocery Store and In-Home Storage, Journal of Food Protection, 79, 4, (582), (2016).
    • , Cutting procedures might be responsible for Listeria monocytogenes contamination of foods: The case of Gorgonzola cheese, Food Control, 61, (54), (2016).
    • , The key role of hygiene and cleanliness in the domestic environment, Perspectives in Public Health, 10.1177/1757913916646052, 136, 4, (210-212), (2016).
    • , Time to abandon the hygiene hypothesis: new perspectives on allergic disease, the human microbiome, infectious disease prevention and the role of targeted hygiene, Perspectives in Public Health, 10.1177/1757913916650225, 136, 4, (213-224), (2016).
    • , Efficiency of Several Cultural Methods and a Chick Bioassay to Recover Dry‐Stressed ampylobacter, Journal of Food Safety, 35, 1, (91-101), (2014).
    • , Synergistic anti-Campylobacter jejuni activity of fluoroquinolone and macrolide antibiotics with phenolic compounds, Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, (2015).
    • , Consumer-Reported Handling of Raw Poultry Products at Home: Results from a National Survey, Journal of Food Protection, 78, 1, (180), (2015).
    • , References, Greywater Reuse, 10.1201/b18217-10, (263-278), (2015).
    • , Impact of disinfectant wipes on the risk of ampylobacter jejuni infection during raw chicken preparation in domestic kitchens, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 119, 1, (245-252), (2015).
    • , The effects of different hygiene procedures in reducing bacterial contamination in a model domestic kitchen, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 119, 2, (582-593), (2015).
    • , Comparison of Acidified Sodium Chlorite, Chlorine Dioxide, Peroxyacetic Acid and Tri-Sodium Phosphate Spray Washes for Decontamination of Chicken Carcasses, Food and Bioprocess Technology, 7, 7, (2093), (2014).
    • , Reduction of risk of almonella infection from kitchen cleaning clothes by use of sodium hypochlorite disinfectant cleaner, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 59, 5, (487-492), (2014).
    • , Poultry Food Safety Control Interventions in the Domestic Kitchen, Journal of Food Safety, 34, 1, (34-41), (2014).
    • , Antibacterial Effect of Silver Nanoparticles Against Four Foodborne Pathogens, Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology, 7, 1, (2014).
    • , Assessment of the personal hygiene and the bacteriological quality of butchers' hands in some abattoirs in Alexandria, Egypt, Food Control, 41, (147), (2014).
    • , Hygiene in the home kitchen: Changes in behaviour and impact of key microbiological hazard control measures, Food Control, 35, 1, (392), (2014).
    • , Initial Contamination of Chicken Parts with Salmonella at Retail and Cross-Contamination of Cooked Chicken with Salmonella from Raw Chicken during Meal Preparation, Journal of Food Protection, 76, 1, (33), (2013).
    • , A risk assessment approach to use of antimicrobials in the home to prevent spread of infection, American Journal of Infection Control, 41, 5, (S87), (2013).
    • , Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic Environment, Foods, 2, 4, (572), (2013).
    • , Diversity, distribution and sources of bacteria in residential kitchens, Environmental Microbiology, 15, 2, (588-596), (2012).
    • , Evaluation of drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in retail poultry and beef, Poultry Science, 92, 4, (1098), (2013).
    • , Community-based infections and the potential role of common touch surfaces as vectors for the transmission of infectious agents in home and community settings, American Journal of Infection Control, 41, 11, (1087), (2013).
    • , Campylobacter, Foodborne Infections and Intoxications, 10.1016/B978-0-12-416041-5.00009-3, (165-185), (2013).
    • , Control of Salmonella in food related environments by chemical disinfection, Food Research International, 45, 2, (532), (2012).
    • , Food-Borne Origins of Escherichia coli Causing Extraintestinal Infections, Clinical Infectious Diseases, 55, 5, (712), (2012).
    • , Transfer of Salmonella Enteritidis to four types of surfaces after cleaning procedures and cross-contamination to tomatoes, Food Microbiology, 30, 2, (453), (2012).
    • , Extreme Heat Resistance of Food Borne PathogensCampylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli, andSalmonella typhimuriumon Chicken Breast Fillet during Cooking, International Journal of Microbiology, 2012, (1), (2012).
    • , Impact of prescribed cleaning and disinfectant use on microbial contamination in the home, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 110, 2, (463-471), (2010).
    • , Applicability of surfaces containing silver in domestic refrigerators, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35, 2, (221-227), (2011).
    • , Antimicrobial Lipids as Disinfectants, Antiseptics and Sanitizers, Lipids and Essential Oils as Antimicrobial Agents, (179-201), (2010).
    • , Killing of Campylobacter on contaminated plastic and wooden cutting boards by glycerol monocaprate (monocaprin), Letters in Applied Microbiology, 51, 3, (319-324), (2010).
    • , Quantification and variability of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus cross-contamination during serving and consumption of cooked thick porridge in Lungwena rural households, Malawi, Food Control, 20, 12, (1158), (2009).
    • , Campylobacter and Arcobacter, Foodborne Pathogens, 10.1533/9781845696337.2.718, (718-762), (2009).
    • , Effective household disinfection methods of kitchen sponges, Food Control, 20, 3, (310), (2009).
    • , Outbreaks Where Food Workers Have Been Implicated in the Spread of Foodborne Disease. Part 6. Transmission and Survival of Pathogens in the Food Processing and Preparation Environment, Journal of Food Protection, 72, 1, (202), (2009).
    • , Pathogens in urban wastewaters suitable for reuse, Urban Water Journal, 6, 4, (291), (2009).
    • , Factores de riesgo de casos esporádicos de gastroenteritis por Campylobacter en niños, Gaceta Sanitaria, 23, 4, (326), (2009).
    • , Food safety issues and children's lunchboxes, Perspectives in Public Health, 10.1177/1757913908101607, 129, 2, (77-84), (2009).
    • , The importance of hygiene in the domestic kitchen: Implications for preparation and storage of food and infant formula, Perspectives in Public Health, 10.1177/1757913908101604, 129, 2, (69-76), (2009).
    • , Occurrence of Campylobacter spp. in Raw and Ready-to-Eat Foods and in a Canadian Food Service Operation, Journal of Food Protection, 71, 10, (2087), (2008).
    • , Personal health Bringing good hygiene home, American Journal of Infection Control, 36, 10, (S152), (2008).
    • , Salmonella Prevalence in Slaughtered Buffaloes and Pigs and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Isolates in Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 70, 12, (1345), (2008).
    • , Cross‐contamination in the kitchen: effect of hygiene measures, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 105, 2, (615-624), (2008).
    • , Isolation of Campylobacter jejuni and Coliform Bacilli from Bile and Liver Obtained from Slaughter Cattle in Western Japan, Journal of Food Protection, 71, 6, (1228), (2008).
    • , Quantification of Campylobacter jejuni Cross-Contamination via Hands, Cutlery, and Cutting Board during Preparation of a Chicken Fruit Salad, Journal of Food Protection, 71, 5, (1018), (2008).
    • , Effect of Hand Wash Agents on Controlling the Transmission of Pathogenic Bacteria from Hands to Food, Journal of Food Protection, 70, 12, (2873), (2007).
    • , Effectiveness of domestic antibacterial products in decontaminating food contact surfaces, Food Microbiology, 24, 4, (425), (2007).
    • , The incidence of significant foodborne pathogens in domestic refrigerators, Food Control, 18, 4, (346), (2007).
    • , The effectiveness of hand hygiene procedures in reducing the risks of infections in home and community settings including handwashing and alcohol-based hand sanitizers, American Journal of Infection Control, 35, 10, (S27), (2007).
    • , Evaluation of three commonly used cleaning methods for reducing bacterial numbers on hot drinks vending machine mixing bowls artificially contaminated with Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus, Journal of Foodservice, 18, 4, (153-160), (2007).
    • , A survey for serotyping, antibiotic resistance profiling and PFGE characterization of and the potential multiplication of restaurant Salmonella isolates, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 103, 5, (1681-1690), (2007).
    • , Recovery and Transfer of Salmonella Typhimurium from Four Different Domestic Food Contact Surfaces, Journal of Food Protection, 70, 10, (2273), (2007).
    • , Campylobacters as zoonotic pathogens: A food production perspective, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 117, 3, (237), (2007).
    • , Prevalence, Molecular Characterization and Antimicrobial Resistance of Thermophilic Campylobacter Isolates from Cattle, Hens, Broilers and Broiler Meat in South-eastern Italy, Veterinary Research Communications, 10.1007/s11259-006-3404-3, 31, 1, (113-123), (2006).
    • , Food Safety Guidance for Older Adults, Clinical Infectious Diseases, 42, 9, (1298), (2006).
    • , Assessment of consumer food safety education provided by local authorities in the UK, British Food Journal, 108, 9, (732), (2006).
    • , Too clean, or not too clean: the Hygiene Hypothesis and home hygiene, Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 36, 4, (402-425), (2006).
    • , Campylobacter and related infections, Foodborne Infections and Intoxications, 10.1016/B978-012588365-8/50011-6, (259-287), (2006).
    • , Persistence of Campylobacter jejuni on surfaces in a processing environment and on cutting boards, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 40, 6, (418-423), (2005).
    • , Achieving Continuous Improvement in Reductions in Foodborne Listeriosis—A Risk-Based Approach, Journal of Food Protection, 68, 9, (1932), (2005).
    • , Campylobacter: stress response and resistance, Understanding Pathogen Behaviour, 10.1533/9781845690229.2.279, (279-308), (2005).
    • , Bacterial contamination of domestic kitchens over a 24‐hour period, British Food Journal, 107, 7, (453), (2005).
    • , Improving Food Safety in the Domestic Environment: The Need for a Transdisciplinary Approach, Risk Analysis, 25, 3, (503-517), (2005).
    • , Risk factors for contamination of ready-to-eat street-vended poultry dishes in Dakar, Senegal, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 103, 2, (157), (2005).
    • , Effects of cleaning and disinfection in reducing the spread of Norovirus contamination via environmental surfaces, Journal of Hospital Infection, 58, 1, (42), (2004).
    • , Disinfection and the prevention of infectious disease, American Journal of Infection Control, 32, 5, (311), (2004).
    • , Enteric Campylobacter: Purging Its Secrets?, Pediatric Research, 55, 1, (3), (2004).
    • , Kitchen Practices Used in Handling Broiler Chickens and Survival of Campylobacter spp. on Cutting Surfaces in Kampala, Uganda, Journal of Food Protection, 67, 9, (1957), (2004).
    • , Prevention of food worker transmission of foodborne pathogens: risk assessment and evaluation of effective hygiene intervention strategies, Food Service Technology, 4, 1, (31-49), (2004).
    • , Microbiological and observational analysis of cross contamination risks during domestic food preparation, British Food Journal, 106, 8, (581), (2004).
    • , The effects of cleaning and disinfection in reducing Salmonella contamination in a laboratory model kitchen, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 95, 6, (1351-1360), (2003).
    • , Growth and reduction of microorganisms in sediments collected from a greywater treatment system, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 36, 3, (168-172), (2003).
    • , Tolerance of Salmonella Enteritidis and Staphylococcus aureus to Surface Cleaning and Household Bleach, Journal of Food Protection, 66, 12, (2289), (2003).
    • , The infection potential in the home and the role of hygiene: historical and current perspectives, International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 13, sup1, (S9), (2003).
    • , Cost-Effectiveness of a Targeted Disinfection Program in Household Kitchens To Prevent Foodborne Illnesses in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, Journal of Food Protection, 66, 11, (2103), (2003).
    • , Home hygiene: a risk approach, International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 206, 1, (1), (2003).
    • , Human campylobacteriosis: a challenge for the veterinary profession, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 223, 4, (445), (2003).
    • , Hygiene in the home: relating bugs and behaviour, Social Science & Medicine, 57, 4, (657), (2003).
    • , Campylobacter Jejuni and Other Enteric Campylobacter, Encyclopedia of Environmental Microbiology, (2003).
    • , Faecal contamination of greywater and associated microbial risks, Water Research, 37, 3, (645), (2003).
    • , Coping with hygiene in South Africa, a water scarce country, International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 13, sup1, (S95), (2003).
    • , Residential Environments, Bacterial Contaminants In, Encyclopedia of Environmental Microbiology, (2003).
    • , Consumer Food Handling in the Home: A Review of Food Safety Studies, Journal of Food Protection, 66, 1, (130), (2003).
    • , Transfer of Salmonella and Campylobacter from Stainless Steel to Romaine Lettuce, Journal of Food Protection, 66, 12, (2231), (2003).
    • , Developing an effective policy for home hygiene: a risk-based approach, International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 13, sup1, (S57), (2003).
    • , Disinfection and the prevention of infectious disease, American Journal of Infection Control, 31, 4, (243), (2003).
    • , Achieving hygiene in the domestic kitchen: the effectiveness of commonly used cleaning procedures, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 92, 5, (885-892), (2002).
    • , Significance of biocide usage and antimicrobial resistance in domiciliary environments, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 92, (144S-157S), (2002).
    • , Reply, Clinical Infectious Diseases, 34, 5, (720), (2002).
    • , A study of cross-contamination of food-borne pathogens in the domestic kitchen in the Republic of Ireland, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 76, 1-2, (143), (2002).
    • , Prevalence of Thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in Ready-to-Eat Foods and Raw Poultry in Northern Ireland, Journal of Food Protection, 65, 8, (1326), (2002).
    • , Comparative susceptibility of resident and transient hand bacteria to para‐chloro‐meta‐xylenol and triclosan, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 93, 2, (336-344), (2002).
    • , The physiology of Campylobacter species and its relevance to their role as foodborne pathogens, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 74, 3, (177), (2002).
    • , Preventing infection in the home, British Journal of Infection Control, 10.1177/175717740200300304, 3, 3, (14-17), (2016).
    • , The effect of interfering substances on the disinfection process: a mathematical model, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 91, 3, (548-555), (2001).
    • , Incidence of Campylobacter and Salmonella isolated from retail chicken and associated packaging in South Wales, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 33, 6, (450-454), (2008).
    • , Contributory factors to the spread of contamination in a model kitchen, British Food Journal, 103, 1, (23), (2001).
    • , The potential benefits of infection control measures in the home, American Journal of Infection Control, 29, 4, (247), (2001).
    • , Preventing infectious disease in the domestic setting: A risk-based approach, American Journal of Infection Control, 29, 4, (207), (2001).
    • , The Spread and Persistence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in the Domestic Kitchen, Journal of Infection, 43, 1, (50), (2001).
    • , Gastrointestinal Disease in the Domestic Setting: What are the Issues?, Journal of Infection, 43, 1, (23), (2001).
    • , Developing a Rational Approach to Hygiene in the Domestic Setting, Journal of Infection, 43, 1, (45), (2001).
    • , Campylobacter spp. in the kitchen: spread and persistence, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 90, S6, (115S-120S), (2001).
    • , Relationship between cross-contamination and the transmission of foodborne pathogens in the home, The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 10.1097/00006454-200010001-00005, 19, Supplement, (S111-S113), (2000).
    • , Economic evaluation of infection control practices in day care and the home: methodologic challenges and proposed solutions, The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 10.1097/00006454-200010001-00010, 19, Supplement, (S125-S128), (2000).
    • , Recycling nutrients contained in human excreta to agriculture: Pathways, processes, and products, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 10.1080/10643389.2018.1558889, (1-49), (2019).
    • , Evaluation of Microbial Contamination in Frequently Used Fomites in Kuwait, Biodiversity International Journal, 10.15406/bij.2017.01.00013, 1, 3, (2017).
    • , Health and nutritional quality assessment of salmonella-contaminated poultry products in sub-Saharan Africa; A case of cote divoire, African Journal of Microbiology Research, 10.5897/AJMR2018.8979, 12, 48, (1067-1072), (2018).