Addiction
Research Report

Trends and age, period and cohort effects for marijuana use prevalence in the 1984–2015 US National Alcohol Surveys

William C. Kerr,

Corresponding Author

Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA, USA

Correspondence to: William C. Kerr, Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound Street, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA. E-mail: wkerr@arg.orgSearch for more papers by this author
Camillia Lui,

Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Yu Ye,

Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 September 2017
Citations: 44
Get access to the full version of this article. View access options below.
Institutional Login
Loading institution options...
Log in to Wiley Online Library

If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, please log in.

Purchase Instant Access
    • View the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures for a period of 48 hours.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article/chapter PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article/chapter can be printed.
    • Article/chapter can be downloaded.
    • Article/chapter can not be redistributed.

Abstract

Background and Aims

Epidemiological trends show marijuana use in the United States to have increased in recent years. Previous research has identified cohort effects as contributing to the rising prevalence, in particular birth cohorts born after 1945. However, given recent policy efforts to regulate marijuana use at the state level, period effects could also play a contributory role. This study aimed to examine whether cohort or period effects play a larger role in explaining trends in marijuana use.

Design

Using data from seven National Alcohol Surveys, we estimated age–period–cohort decomposition models for marijuana use, controlling for socio-demographic measures.

Setting

United States.

Participants

US general population aged 18 and older from 1984 to 2015.

Measurements

Any past-year marijuana use.

Findings

Results indicated that period effects were the main driver of rising marijuana use prevalence. Models including indicators of medical and recreational marijuana policies did not find any significant positive impacts.

Conclusions

The steep rise in marijuana use in the United States since 2005 occurred across the population and is attributable to general period effects not linked specifically to the liberalization of marijuana policies in some states.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.