Biometrics
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

GEE for Multinomial Responses Using a Local Odds Ratios Parameterization

Anestis Touloumis

Corresponding Author

EMBL‐European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, U.K.

email: anestis@ebi.ac.uk

email: aa@stat.ufl.edu

email: maria.kateri@rwth-aachen.de

Search for more papers by this author
Alan Agresti

Corresponding Author

Department of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A

email: anestis@ebi.ac.uk

email: aa@stat.ufl.edu

email: maria.kateri@rwth-aachen.de

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Kateri

Corresponding Author

Institute of Statistics, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany

email: anestis@ebi.ac.uk

email: aa@stat.ufl.edu

email: maria.kateri@rwth-aachen.de

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 31 May 2013
Citations: 43
Get access to the full version of this article. View access options below.
Institutional Login
Loading institution options...

If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, .

    • View the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures for a period of 48 hours.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article/chapter PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article/chapter can be printed.
    • Article/chapter can be downloaded.
    • Article/chapter can not be redistributed.

Abstract

Summary

In this article, we propose a generalized estimating equations (GEE) approach for correlated ordinal or nominal multinomial responses using a local odds ratios parameterization. Our motivation lies upon observing that: (i) modeling the dependence between correlated multinomial responses via the local odds ratios is meaningful both for ordinal and nominal response scales and (ii) ordinary GEE methods might not ensure the joint existence of the estimates of the marginal regression parameters and of the dependence structure. To avoid (ii), we treat the so‐called “working” association vector urn:x-wiley:15410420:media:biom12054:biom12054-math-0001 as a “nuisance” parameter vector that defines the local odds ratios structure at the marginalized contingency tables after tabulating the responses without a covariate adjustment at each time pair. To estimate urn:x-wiley:15410420:media:biom12054:biom12054-math-0002 and simultaneously approximate adequately possible underlying dependence structures, we employ the family of association models proposed by Goodman. In simulations, the parameter estimators with the proposed GEE method for a marginal cumulative probit model appear to be less biased and more efficient than those with the independence “working” model, especially for studies having time‐varying covariates and strong correlation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.