Informalizing the Economy: The Return of the Social Question at a Global Level
ABSTRACT
The classical conceptualization of the working class, of workers’ collective action and, especially, of trade unionism, was implicitly or explicitly based on the Standard Employment Relationship that, for a few decades, has been dominant in North America, Europe, Japan and Australasia. The ‘classical’ model of collective bargaining, which has shaped the world's traditional labour movements, was based on this conceptualization. However, it is now increasingly undermined by the rapid spread of ‘informal’ or ‘precarious’ labour in the global North. It is our contention that the ‘classical’ view of the working class and workers’ collective action is fundamentally biased and takes as a norm or standard what was in fact an historical exception. The real norm or standard in global capitalism is insecurity, informality or precariousness, and the Standard Employment Relationship is an historical phenomenon which had a deep impact in a limited part of the world for a relatively short period of time. If, as we argue, the ‘Rest’ is not now becoming like the ‘West’, but the other way round, then the ‘traditional’ forms of collective action that have developed in the North Atlantic region during the last two centuries are gradually losing much of their impact. New forms of collective action are emerging, though these are often still at an embryonic stage. It is, therefore, high time to rethink the concept of the working class and the ways in which it can further its interests.
Number of times cited: 22
- Susana Narotzky, Rethinking the concept of labour, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 24, S1, (29-43), (2018).
- Veronika Nagy, The Janus face of precarity – Securitisation of Roma mobility in the UK, Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, (026909421876411), (2018).
- Ana Alacovska, Informal creative labour practices: A relational work perspective, Human Relations, (001872671875499), (2018).
- Terry Irving, Book review: Michael Quinlan, The Origins of Worker Mobilisation: Australia 1788–1850QuinlanMichael, The Origins of Worker Mobilisation: Australia 1788–1850, Routledge: London, 2017; 308 pp., ISBN 9781138084087, AUD 221., The Economic and Labour Relations Review, (103530461876815), (2018).
- Brigitte Aulenbacher and Fabienne Décieux, Handbuch Interdisziplinäre Geschlechterforschung, (1), (2018).
- Kathleen M. Millar, Toward a critical politics of precarity, Sociology Compass, 11, 6, (2017).
- Miles Larmer, Permanent precarity: capital and labour in the Central African copperbelt, Labor History, 58, 2, (170), (2017).
- Anette Fagertun, Localising Globalisation: Gendered Transformations of Work in Emergent Economies, The Journal of Development Studies, 53, 3, (311), (2017).
- Sarah Swider (苏之慧), Informal and Precarious Work: The Precariat and China (非正式和不稳定的工作:不稳定型无产者和中国), Rural China, 14, 1, (19), (2017).
- Ilias Livanos and Imanol Nuñez, Early exit or longer stay? The effect of precarious employment on planned age of retirement, Personnel Review, 46, 8, (1571), (2017).
- K. P. Kannan, India’s labour question is also a social question: inequalizing growth and increasing social equality under neoliberal economic regimes, Journal of Social and Economic Development, (2017).
- Gianluca De Angelis, Soggettività in gioco: la gratuitizzazione del lavoro in una cooperativa sociale, SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO, 145, (133), (2017).
- Anette Fagertun, Labour in Paradise: Gender, Class and Social Mobility in the Informal Tourism Economy of Urban Bali, Indonesia, The Journal of Development Studies, 53, 3, (331), (2017).
- Jennifer L Tucker, Affect and the dialectics of uncertainty: Governing a Paraguayan frontier town, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35, 4, (733), (2017).
- Jörg Nowak, Mass Strikes in India and Brazil as the Terrain for a New Social Movement Unionism, Development and Change, 48, 5, (965-986), (2017).
- Eloisa Betti, Gender and Precarious Labor in a Historical Perspective: Italian Women and Precarious Work between Fordism and Post-Fordism, International Labor and Working-Class History, 89, (64), (2016).
- Keshab Das, Situating Labour in the Global Production Network Debate: As if the ‘South’ Mattered, The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 59, 3, (343), (2016).
- Raquel Varela, State Policies Towards Precarious Work: Employment and Unemployment in Contemporary Portugal, International Review of Social History, 61, S24, (263), (2016).
- Leo Lucassen, Working together: new directions in global labour history, Journal of Global History, 11, 01, (66), (2016).
- Sarah Mosoetsa, Joel Stillerman and Chris Tilly, Precarious Labor, South and North: An Introduction, International Labor and Working-Class History, 89, (5), (2016).
- Ashwani Saith, A Defiant Sociologist and His Craft: Jan Breman An Appreciation and a Conversation, Development and Change, 47, 4, (876-901), (2016).
- Alessandra Mezzadri and Lulu Fan, ‘Classes of Labour’ at the Margins of Global Commodity Chains in India and China, Development and Change, , (2018).
