European Journal of Cancer Care
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Full Access

Portuguese oncologists’ practices regarding female fertility preservation: Which barriers most relate to these practices?

Cláudia Melo Master degree

Corresponding Author

Doctoral student, Clinical Psychologist

Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

Unit of Psychological Intervention, Maternity Daniel de Matos, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal

Correspondence

Cláudia Melo, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Rua do Colégio Novo, Coimbra, Portugal.

Email: claudiasmelosilva@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author
Ana Fonseca Doctoral degree

Post‐doctoral student, Clinical Psychologist

Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

Unit of Psychological Intervention, Maternity Daniel de Matos, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Cristina Silva Master degree

Doctoral student, Pharmacist

Centre for Pharmaceutical Studies, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Teresa Almeida‐Santos Doctoral degree

Professor, Medical Gynecologist

Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

Portuguese Centre for Fertility Preservation, Reproductive Medicine Department, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Cristina Canavarro Doctoral degree

Professor, Clinical Psychologist

Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

Unit of Psychological Intervention, Maternity Daniel de Matos, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 January 2018
Citations: 1
Get access to the full version of this article. View access options below.
Institutional Login
Loading institution options...
Log in to Wiley Online Library

If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, please log in.

Purchase Instant Access
    • View the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures for a period of 48 hours.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article/chapter PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article/chapter can be printed.
    • Article/chapter can be downloaded.
    • Article/chapter can not be redistributed.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the current practice patterns of Portuguese oncologists with different clinical specialties regarding female fertility preservation (FP) and to determine the relative endorsement of different barriers to these practices. A total of 111 doctors with different clinical specialties assisting female cancer patients of childbearing age at Portuguese clinical institutions completed a self‐report questionnaire to assess their current practice patterns regarding female FP and their perceptions of the barriers to these practices. Although the majority of the oncologists reported discussing the reproductive future with their patients, 2.8% and 7.2% of these clinicians reported never informing about the risk of infertility and about FP, respectively, and 75.8% of the participants have referred fewer than ten patients to a reproductive medicine doctor. Time with patients was the strongest endorsed barrier to these practices. A stronger endorsement of the barriers “oncologists’ communication skills” and “patient‐related factors” was related to a lower frequency of informing about both the risk of cancer‐related infertility and about FP. It is important to overcome the intrinsic barriers that emerged as being the most relevant to oncologists’ FP practices and that can be modified, namely the lack of communication skills and the oncologists’ perceptions of their patients’ characteristics.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.