Portuguese oncologists’ practices regarding female fertility preservation: Which barriers most relate to these practices?
Corresponding Author
Doctoral student, Clinical Psychologist
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Unit of Psychological Intervention, Maternity Daniel de Matos, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
Correspondence
Cláudia Melo, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Rua do Colégio Novo, Coimbra, Portugal.
Email: claudiasmelosilva@gmail.com
Search for more papers by this authorPost‐doctoral student, Clinical Psychologist
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Unit of Psychological Intervention, Maternity Daniel de Matos, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
Search for more papers by this authorDoctoral student, Pharmacist
Centre for Pharmaceutical Studies, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Search for more papers by this authorProfessor, Medical Gynecologist
Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Portuguese Centre for Fertility Preservation, Reproductive Medicine Department, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
Search for more papers by this authorProfessor, Clinical Psychologist
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Unit of Psychological Intervention, Maternity Daniel de Matos, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Doctoral student, Clinical Psychologist
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Unit of Psychological Intervention, Maternity Daniel de Matos, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
Correspondence
Cláudia Melo, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Rua do Colégio Novo, Coimbra, Portugal.
Email: claudiasmelosilva@gmail.com
Search for more papers by this authorPost‐doctoral student, Clinical Psychologist
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Unit of Psychological Intervention, Maternity Daniel de Matos, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
Search for more papers by this authorDoctoral student, Pharmacist
Centre for Pharmaceutical Studies, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Search for more papers by this authorProfessor, Medical Gynecologist
Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Portuguese Centre for Fertility Preservation, Reproductive Medicine Department, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
Search for more papers by this authorProfessor, Clinical Psychologist
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Unit of Psychological Intervention, Maternity Daniel de Matos, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
Search for more papers by this authorInstitutional Login
Log in to Wiley Online Library
If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, please log in.
Purchase Instant Access
-
Details
- View the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures for a period of 48 hours.
- Article can not be printed.
- Article can not be downloaded.
- Article can not be redistributed.
-
Details
- Unlimited viewing of the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
- Article can not be printed.
- Article can not be downloaded.
- Article can not be redistributed.
-
Details
- Unlimited viewing of the article/chapter PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
- Article/chapter can be printed.
- Article/chapter can be downloaded.
- Article/chapter can not be redistributed.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the current practice patterns of Portuguese oncologists with different clinical specialties regarding female fertility preservation (FP) and to determine the relative endorsement of different barriers to these practices. A total of 111 doctors with different clinical specialties assisting female cancer patients of childbearing age at Portuguese clinical institutions completed a self‐report questionnaire to assess their current practice patterns regarding female FP and their perceptions of the barriers to these practices. Although the majority of the oncologists reported discussing the reproductive future with their patients, 2.8% and 7.2% of these clinicians reported never informing about the risk of infertility and about FP, respectively, and 75.8% of the participants have referred fewer than ten patients to a reproductive medicine doctor. Time with patients was the strongest endorsed barrier to these practices. A stronger endorsement of the barriers “oncologists’ communication skills” and “patient‐related factors” was related to a lower frequency of informing about both the risk of cancer‐related infertility and about FP. It is important to overcome the intrinsic barriers that emerged as being the most relevant to oncologists’ FP practices and that can be modified, namely the lack of communication skills and the oncologists’ perceptions of their patients’ characteristics.




