Democratic Accountability, Regulation and Inward Investment Policy
Corresponding Author
Central European University
Corresponding author: Michael T. Dorsch, School of Public Policy, Central European University, Nádor u. 9, 1051 Budapest, Hungary. E‐mail:dorschm@ceu.huSearch for more papers by this authorCentral Bank of Ireland
Search for more papers by this authorUniversity of Gothenburg
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Central European University
Corresponding author: Michael T. Dorsch, School of Public Policy, Central European University, Nádor u. 9, 1051 Budapest, Hungary. E‐mail:dorschm@ceu.huSearch for more papers by this authorCentral Bank of Ireland
Search for more papers by this authorUniversity of Gothenburg
Search for more papers by this authorInstitutional Login
If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, Please log in.
-
Details
- View the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures for a period of 48 hours.
- Article can not be printed.
- Article can not be downloaded.
- Article can not be redistributed.
-
Details
- Unlimited viewing of the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
- Article can not be printed.
- Article can not be downloaded.
- Article can not be redistributed.
-
Details
- Unlimited viewing of the article/chapter PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
- Article/chapter can be printed.
- Article/chapter can be downloaded.
- Article/chapter can not be redistributed.
Abstract
We examine the effect of domestic political accountability on leaders' strategies for attracting foreign direct investment to less developed countries. We consider two policy areas: the tax burden imposed on firms and the regulatory environment in which they operate. We find that democratic governments are more likely to offer relatively lower tax rates to foreign investors, whereas autocratic governments are more likely to offer relatively lax regulation. This result is driven by the greater elasticity of the political survival function to environmental and labor regulations in more democratic countries. Analyses of firm‐level survey data confirm our main theoretical conclusions.




