Global Change Biology
PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLE

Vulnerability of the Great Barrier Reef to climate change and local pressures

Nicholas H. Wolff,

Nicholas H. Wolff

Marine Spatial Ecology Lab, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia

Global Science, The Nature Conservancy, Brunswick, ME, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Peter J. Mumby,

Corresponding Author

Peter J. Mumby

Marine Spatial Ecology Lab, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia

ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia

Correspondence

Peter J. Mumby, Marine Spatial Ecology Lab, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Email: p.j.mumby@uq.edu.au

and

Kenneth R.N. Anthony, Australian Institute of Marine Science, PMB3, Townsville, QLD, Australia.

Email: k.anthony@aims.gov.au

Search for more papers by this author
Michelle Devlin,

Michelle Devlin

Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK

Catchment to Reef Research Group, Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research, James Cook University, Douglas, QLD, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Kenneth R. N. Anthony,

Corresponding Author

Kenneth R. N. Anthony

Australian Institute of Marine Science, PMB3, Townsville, QLD, Australia

Correspondence

Peter J. Mumby, Marine Spatial Ecology Lab, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Email: p.j.mumby@uq.edu.au

and

Kenneth R.N. Anthony, Australian Institute of Marine Science, PMB3, Townsville, QLD, Australia.

Email: k.anthony@aims.gov.au

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 February 2018
Citations: 56
Get access to the full version of this article. View access options below.
Institutional Login
Loading institution options...
Log in to Wiley Online Library

If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, please log in.

Purchase Instant Access
    • View the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures for a period of 48 hours.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article/chapter PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article/chapter can be printed.
    • Article/chapter can be downloaded.
    • Article/chapter can not be redistributed.

Abstract

Australia's Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is under pressure from a suite of stressors including cyclones, crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS), nutrients from river run-off and warming events that drive mass coral bleaching. Two key questions are: how vulnerable will the GBR be to future environmental scenarios, and to what extent can local management actions lower vulnerability in the face of climate change? To address these questions, we use a simple empirical and mechanistic coral model to explore six scenarios that represent plausible combinations of climate change projections (from four Representative Concentration Pathways, RCPs), cyclones and local stressors. Projections (2017–2050) indicate significant potential for coral recovery in the near-term, relative to current state, followed by climate-driven decline. Under a scenario of unmitigated emissions (RCP8.5) and business-as-usual management of local stressors, mean coral cover on the GBR is predicted to recover over the next decade and then rapidly decline to only 3% by year 2050. In contrast, a scenario of strong carbon mitigation (RCP2.6) and improved water quality, predicts significant coral recovery over the next two decades, followed by a relatively modest climate-driven decline that sustained coral cover above 26% by 2050. In an analysis of the impacts of cumulative stressors on coral cover relative to potential coral cover in the absence of such impacts, we found that GBR-wide reef performance will decline 27%–74% depending on the scenario. Up to 66% of performance loss is attributable to local stressors. The potential for management to reduce vulnerability, measured here as the mean number of years coral cover can be kept above 30%, is spatially variable. Management strategies that alleviate cumulative impacts have the potential to reduce the vulnerability of some midshelf reefs in the central GBR by 83%, but only if combined with strong mitigation of carbon emissions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.