Ecology Letters

Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems

Caitlin Mullan Crain,

Corresponding Author

Caitlin Mullan Crain

University of California, Santa Cruz and The Nature Conservancy Global Marine Initiative, Center for Ocean Health, 100 Shaffer Rd., Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA

*Email: ccrain@stanford.eduSearch for more papers by this author
Kristy Kroeker,

Kristy Kroeker

Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Hopkins Marine Station, 100 Oceanview Blvd., Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Benjamin S. Halpern,

Benjamin S. Halpern

National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, 735 State St, Santa Barbara, CA 93101, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 November 2008
Citations: 1,137
Get access to the full version of this article. View access options below.
Institutional Login
Loading institution options...
Log in to Wiley Online Library

If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, please log in.

Purchase Instant Access
    • View the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures for a period of 48 hours.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article/chapter PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article/chapter can be printed.
    • Article/chapter can be downloaded.
    • Article/chapter can not be redistributed.

Abstract

Humans impact natural systems in a multitude of ways, yet the cumulative effect of multiple stressors on ecological communities remains largely unknown. Here we synthesized 171 studies that manipulated two or more stressors in marine and coastal systems and found that cumulative effects in individual studies were additive (26%), synergistic (36%), and antagonistic (38%). The overall interaction effect across all studies was synergistic, but interaction type varied by response level (community: antagonistic, population: synergistic), trophic level (autotrophs: antagonistic, heterotrophs: synergistic), and specific stressor pair (seven pairs additive, three pairs each synergistic and antagonistic). Addition of a third stressor changed interaction effects significantly in two-thirds of all cases and doubled the number of synergistic interactions. Given that most studies were performed in laboratories where stressor effects can be carefully isolated, these three-stressor results suggest that synergies may be quite common in nature where more than two stressors almost always coexist. While significant gaps exist in multiple stressor research, our results suggest an immediate need to account for stressor interactions in ecological studies and conservation planning.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.