The effect of male circumcision on sexuality
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To prospectively study, using a questionnaire, the sexuality of men circumcised as adults compared to uncircumcised men, and to compare their sex lives before and after circumcision.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
The study included 373 sexually active men, of whom 255 were circumcised and 118 were not. Of the 255 circumcised men, 138 had been sexually active before circumcision, and all were circumcised at >20 years of age. As the Brief Male Sexual Function Inventory does not specifically address the quality of sex life, questions were added to compare sexual and masturbatory pleasure before and after circumcision.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in sexual drive, erection, ejaculation, and ejaculation latency time between circumcised and uncircumcised men. Masturbatory pleasure decreased after circumcision in 48% of the respondents, while 8% reported increased pleasure. Masturbatory difficulty increased after circumcision in 63% of the respondents but was easier in 37%. About 6% answered that their sex lives improved, while 20% reported a worse sex life after circumcision.
CONCLUSION
There was a decrease in masturbatory pleasure and sexual enjoyment after circumcision, indicating that adult circumcision adversely affects sexual function in many men, possibly because of complications of the surgery and a loss of nerve endings.
Abbreviations
-
- BMSFI
-
- Brief Male Sexual Function Inventory
-
- ELT
-
- ejaculatory latency time.
INTRODUCTION
Male circumcision removes 33–50% of the penile skin, and nearly all of the penile fine‐touch neuroreceptors [1]. While there has been debate about whether circumcision affects sexual sensation of the penis, there have been few relevant studies. Studies of circumcision and sexual function have been mostly done on neonatally circumcised males [2, 3], and little difference was found in sexuality in these studies. Two studies on males who were circumcised as adults for mostly medical [4] and mostly religious [5] reasons were inconclusive. We recently reported that South Korea has a surprisingly high circumcision rate [6, 7]; it is the only country among its geographical and cultural neighbours in which most boys are circumcised. Male circumcision started 50 years ago in South Korea, and now the country has one of the highest male circumcision rates in the world. As circumcision in South Korea has never been predominantly neonatal, most circumcisions were of boys, adolescents and adults. Therefore, South Korea can provide unique clues about the effects of adult circumcision on sexuality. In an attempt to answer whether adult circumcision affects sexuality, we performed a prospective study comparing men who were circumcised or not, and comparing the sex lives of men before and after circumcision.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
The study included 373 sexually active men (aged 30–57 years) of whom 255 were circumcised (mean age 37.1 years, sd 5.3, range 30–57) and 118 were not (mean age 38.2 years, sd 5.3, range 30–54). Of the 255 circumcised men, 138 were sexually active before circumcision, and all were circumcised at the age of ≥ 20 years. To address the effects of circumcision on the quality of sex life, including masturbation, we modified the Brief Male Sexual Function Inventory (BMSFI) to include questions on whether sex life and masturbatory pleasure had improved or worsened after circumcision. In addition, we asked about ejaculation latency times (ELTs) and whether scars were left after circumcision. The questionnaire had 11 questions (Appendix); questions 1–4 are similar to those in the BMSFI, but additional questions on ELT (question 5) and masturbation (question 6) were included. To focus on the effects of circumcision on their sexual lives, only those 138 men who could compare the quality of their sex lives including masturbation before and after circumcision were asked to complete questions 7–11, which compare the quality of sex life before and after circumcision.
Chi‐square analyses were used to determine significance differences, with P < 0.05 considered to indicate statistical significance.
RESULTS
There were no statistically significant differences in sexual drive, erection and ejaculation between circumcised and uncircumcised men (questions 1–4; data not shown). There was a slightly longer ELT in uncircumcised men at a mean (sd) of 12.7 (7.4) min than in circumcised men, at 10.9 (7.3) min (difference not statistically significant). There was a significantly higher ‘sometimes’ response in the uncircumcised men in masturbation frequency (question 6; P < 0.05), indicating that they have slightly higher overall masturbation frequency than circumcised men. Comparisons of masturbation frequency between the circumcised and uncircumcised men are shown in Fig. 1 (question 6).

The masturbation frequency of circumcised and uncircumcised men. There was a significantly higher ‘sometimes’ response in the uncircumcised men in masturbation frequency (P < 0.05).
Masturbatory pleasure decreased after circumcision in 48% (P < 0.05) of men compared with 8% who reported increased pleasure. The remaining 44% reported ‘no change’ (question 7) (Fig. 2). Masturbatory difficulty increased after circumcision in 63% (P < 0.05) and masturbation became easier in 37% (question 8) (Fig. 3). There was little change in masturbation frequency after circumcision (question 9).

Masturbatory pleasure before and after circumcision. Masturbatory pleasure decreased after circumcision in 48% (P < 0.05) compared with 8% who reported increased pleasure.

Masturbatory difficulty before and after circumcision. Masturbatory difficulty increased after circumcision in 63% (P < 0.05) and masturbation got easier in 37%
For the effect of circumcision on their sex lives (question 10), 74% reported ‘no change’, ≈ 6% answered that ‘their sex lives got better’, and 20% reported worse sex lives after circumcision (Fig. 4). For those who reported a better or worse sex life after circumcision, we asked why they felt that their sex lives had improved (question 10–1) or worsened (question 10–2). Most reported improved or lost sensation as the chief causes for better or worse sex lives. Other causes for a worse sex life included insufficient skin resulting in uncomfortable erection, erectile curvature from uneven skin loss, pain and bleeding upon erection/manipulation, severe scaring, and reduced penile size.

Sexual pleasure before and after circumcision. Sexual pleasure decreased after circumcision in 20% (P < 0.05) but got better in 6%, with the remainder reporting ‘no change’.
Respondents reported wide‐ranging physical consequences of circumcision (question 11), the most common being scarring; there were small scars in 63% and large scars in 9% of the circumcised men (Fig. 5).

Respondents reported wide‐ranging physical consequences after circumcision; the most common was scarring.
DISCUSSION
In South Korea, many men are circumcised as adults, after they have led active sex lives; these men can compare their sex lives before and after circumcision. This is because circumcision in South Korea is a relatively recent event, having reached >100% circumcision rate (compared with the male birth population) in the last 20 years. This unique situation, in terms of research on circumcision’s effect on sexuality, contrasts with other cultures where adult circumcision is rare, simply because circumcision is practised on neonates or pre‐teens. Even when such men have been found and interviewed [4, 5, 8], they do not represent the general population, but those with medical indications [4] or religious convictions about circumcision [5]. In this sense, South Korea provides a unique opportunity to study the effect of circumcision on sexual activity in a truly general population.
The BMSFI was designed by O’Leary et al.[9] to measure sexual desire, erectile function, ejaculation, problem assessment, and overall satisfaction. Although validated and in wide use, the BMSFI is inadequate for differentiating changes in sexual pleasure before and after circumcision. For this reason, we retained only some of the original BMSFI questions and added some more specific questions about sexual and masturbatory pleasure, in particular to differentiate effects of circumcision on sex life.
That there were no statistically significant differences between circumcised and uncircumcised men in sexual drive, erection, and ejaculation agrees with a previous study by Senkul et al.[5]. The longer ELT reported in uncircumcised men is numerically in agreement with O’Hara and O’Hara [10], who reported an ELT of 14.9 min for uncircumcised men and 10.7 min for circumcised men, but this difference was not statistically significant. The overall ELTs for both circumcised and uncircumcised men are much longer than found in the Senkul et al. [5] study.
The effect of circumcision on masturbation is interesting, as preventing masturbation was one of the main original reasons often cited for the popularity of circumcision in America. The frequency of masturbation seems to have decreased only slightly after circumcision, but there was a striking difference in the pleasure of masturbation, with 48% reporting less pleasure from masturbation after circumcision, in contrast to 8% who reported more pleasure. We think that this is one of the most important findings of the present study. This is consistent with more men finding masturbation more difficult after circumcision, possibly because of the loss of the foreskin.
Of the 138 men aged >30 years who could compare their sex lives before and after circumcision, >70% (102) reported that there was no difference. However, circumcised men were more than three times more likely to report less enjoyable sex lives after circumcision than better sex lives (28 vs eight men). While decreased sensation was the most frequently cited reason (21 of 28 men) for a less enjoyable sex life, complaints about the physical effects of circumcision on their penises and consequent adverse effects on sex life were also prominent (13 of 28; multiple complaints were separately counted). While this is consistent with our earlier study [7], it suggests that more attention should be given to anatomical alteration of the male genitalia by circumcision. This conclusion is supported by the reports of major scars by ≈ 9% of the circumcised men in the present study.
In summary, we studied the effects of circumcision on sexuality. There were no differences in sexual drive, erection and ejaculation, but circumcised men reported decreased masturbatory pleasure and sexual enjoyment. We conclude that adult circumcision adversely affects sexual function in a significant number of men, possibly because of loss of nerve endings. In addition, ≈ 9% of the circumcised men reported severe scarring of their penises, and this population probably overlaps with those who reported insufficient skin resulting in uncomfortable erections, penile curvature from uneven skin loss, and pain and bleeding upon erection/manipulation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We thank all respondents of the survey for their kind cooperation throughout the study.
DS Kim was supported by the Korea Young Scientist Award.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None declared.
Appendix
QUESTIONNAIRE
- A.
How old are you?
- B.
Are you circumcised?
- C.
If you are circumcised, how old were you when circumcised?
- 1
During the past 30 days, on how many days have you felt sexual drive?
- (a)
No days
- (b)
Only a few days
- (c)
Some days
- (d)
Most days
- (e)
Almost every day
- (a)
- 2
During the past 30 days, how often have you had sexual relationships with female partner(s)?
- (a)
Not at all
- (b)
1−2
- (c)
3−4
- (d)
5−6
- (e)
7−10
- (f)
More than 10
- (g)
Almost every day
- (a)
- 3
How much difficulty have you had ejaculating when you have been sexually stimulated?
- (a)
No difficulty
- (b)
Little difficulty
- (c)
Some difficulty
- (d)
Almost every time
- (a)
- 4
When you had erections, how often were they firm enough to have sexual intercourse?
- (a)
Almost every times
- (b)
Most times
- (c)
Some times
- (d)
Only a few times
- (e)
Not at all
- (a)
- 5
What is your average duration of coitus?
- 6
How often do you masturbate?
- (a)
Not at all
- (b)
Sometimes
- (c)
Fairly often
- (a)
- 7
Is your masturbatory pleasure better or worse after circumcision?
- (a)
Better
- (b)
Worse
- (c)
No change
- (a)
- 8
Do you find it easier or more difficult to masturbate after circumcision?
- (a)
More difficult
- (b)
Easier
- (a)
- 9
Has your frequency of masturbation changed after circumcision?
- (a)
Higher
- (b)
Lower
- (c)
No change
- (a)
- 10
Has your sex life improved or worsened after circumcision?
- (a)
Better
- (b)
Worse
- (c)
No change
- (a)
-
If you answered (a) or (b) question 10, please answer question 11.
- 11
Do you have scar(s) in your penis after circumcision?
- (a)
No scar
- (b)
Small scar
- (c)
Big scar
- (a)
Number of times cited: 51
- K. Eckert, N. Janssen, M. Franz and P. Liedgens, Die nicht-retrahierbare Vorhaut bei beschwerdefreien Jungen, Der Urologe, 56, 3, (351), (2017).
- Luigi Gallo, The prevalence of an excessive prepuce and the effects of distal circumcision on premature ejaculation, Arab Journal of Urology, 15, 2, (140), (2017).
- Monica P.C. Nordstrom, Nelli Westercamp, Walter Jaoko, Timothy Okeyo and Robert C. Bailey, Medical Male Circumcision Is Associated With Improvements in Pain During Intercourse and Sexual Satisfaction in Kenya, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 14, 4, (601), (2017).
- Jennifer A. Bossio and Caroline F. Pukall, Attitude Toward One’s Circumcision Status Is More Important than Actual Circumcision Status for Men’s Body Image and Sexual Functioning, Archives of Sexual Behavior, (2017).
- Brian J Morris, John N Krieger and Jeffrey D Klausner, Critical evaluation of unscientific arguments disparaging affirmative infant male circumcision policy, World Journal of Clinical Pediatrics, 5, 3, (251), (2016).
- B. Friedman, J. Khoury, N. Petersiel, T. Yahalomi, M. Paul and A. Neuberger, Pros and cons of circumcision: an evidence-based overview, Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 22, 9, (768), (2016).
- Laura M. Carpenter and Heather Hensman Kettrey, (Im)perishable Pleasure, (In)destructible Desire: Sexual Themes in U.S. and English News Coverage of Male Circumcision and Female Genital Cutting, The Journal of Sex Research, 52, 8, (841), (2015).
- S Todd Sorokan, Jane C Finlay and Ann L Jefferies, La circoncision néonatale, Paediatrics & Child Health, 20, 6, (316), (2015).
- Brian D. Earp, Do the Benefits of Male Circumcision Outweigh the Risks? A Critique of the Proposed CDC Guidelines, Frontiers in Pediatrics, 3, (2015).
- Gregory J. Boyle, Does Male Circumcision Adversely Affect Sexual Sensation, Function, or Satisfaction? Critical Comment on Morris and Krieger (2013), Advances in Sexual Medicine, 05, 02, (7), (2015).
- Allan J. Jacobs and Kavita Shah Arora, Ritual Male Infant Circumcision and Human Rights, The American Journal of Bioethics, 15, 2, (30), (2015).
- S Todd Sorokan, Jane C Finlay and Ann L Jefferies, Newborn male circumcision, Paediatrics & Child Health, 20, 6, (311), (2015).
- Gregory J. Boyle, Circumcision of Infants and Children: Short-Term Trauma and Long-Term Psychosexual Harm, Advances in Sexual Medicine, 10.4236/asm.2015.52004, 05, 02, (22-38), (2015).
- Brian J. Morris and Edward C. Green, Circumcision, Male, The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society, (253-256), (2014).
- L. Gallo, Patients affected by premature ejaculation due to glans hypersensitivity refuse circumcision as a potential definite treatment for their problem, Andrologia, 46, 4, (349-355), (2013).
- Jennifer A. Bossio, Caroline F. Pukall and Stephen Steele, A Review of the Current State of the Male Circumcision Literature, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 12, (2847-2864), (2014).
- B F Alp, S Uguz, E Malkoc, F Ates, F Dursun, S Okcelik, H Kocoglu and A K Karademir, Does circumcision have a relationship with ejaculation time? Premature ejaculation evaluated using new diagnostic tools, International Journal of Impotence Research, 26, 4, (121), (2014).
- J. Dias, R. Freitas, R. Amorim, P. Espiridião, L. Xambre and L. Ferraz, Adult circumcision and male sexual health: a retrospective analysis, Andrologia, 46, 5, (459-464), (2013).
- Ming-Hsin Yang, Chih-Wei Tsao, Sheng-Tang Wu, Feng-Ping Chuang, En Meng, Shou-Hung Tang, Guang-Huan Sun, Dah-Shyong Yu, Sun-Yran Chang and Tai-Lung Cha, The effect of circumcision on young adult sexual function, The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 30, 6, (305), (2014).
- Bruno Halioua and Bernard Lobel, Controverses actuelles sur la circoncision, La Presse Médicale, 43, 11, (1168), (2014).
- Ye Tian, Wei Liu, Jian-Zhong Wang, Romel Wazir, Xuan Yue and Kun-Jie Wang, Effects of circumcision on male sexual functions: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Asian Journal of Andrology, 15, 5, (662), (2013).
- Guy A. Bronselaer, Justine M. Schober, Heino F.L. Meyer‐Bahlburg, Guy T'Sjoen, Robert Vlietinck and Piet B. Hoebeke, Male circumcision decreases penile sensitivity as measured in a large cohort, BJU International, 111, 5, (820-827), (2013).
- Sara Johnsdotter, Discourses on sexual pleasure after genital modifications: the fallacy of genital determinism (a response to J. Steven Svoboda), Global Discourse, 3, 2, (256), (2013).
- Raouf Seyam, A systematic review of the correlates and management of nonpremature ejaculatory dysfunction in heterosexual men, Therapeutic Advances in Urology, 10.1177/1756287213497231, 5, 5, (254-297), (2013).
- Hanoch Ben-Yami, Circumcision: What should be done?, Journal of Medical Ethics, 39, 7, (459), (2013).
- Brian J. Morris and John N. Krieger, Does Male Circumcision Affect Sexual Function, Sensitivity, or Satisfaction?—A Systematic Review, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10, 11, (2644-2657), (2013).
- Joseph Mazor, The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision: Table 1, Journal of Medical Ethics, 39, 7, (421), (2013).
- Brian J. Morris, Jake H. Waskett, Dan Bollinger and Robert Van Howe, Letters to the Editor, International Journal of Men's Health, 11, 2, (177), (2012).
- Joseph G. L. Lee, Robert Darby and Robert Van Howe, Ecologic fallacy and the social ecology of circumcision, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 36, 3, (293-295), (2012).
- David J. Wilkinson, Nick Lansdale, Lucy H. Everitt, Sean S. Marven, Jenny Walker, Rang N. Shawis, J.P. Roberts, A.E. Mackinnon and P.P. Godbole, Foreskin preputioplasty and intralesional triamcinolone: a valid alternative to circumcision for balanitis xerotica obliterans, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 47, 4, (756), (2012).
- M. Frisch, M. Lindholm and M. Gronbaek, Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, cross-sectional study in Denmark, International Journal of Epidemiology, 40, 5, (1367), (2011).
- Wei Shuong Tang and Ee Ming Khoo, Prevalence and Correlates of Premature Ejaculation in a Primary Care Setting: A Preliminary Cross‐Sectional Study, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8, 7, (2071-2078), (2011).
- Robert Darby and Robert Van Howe, Not a surgical vaccine: there is no case for boosting infant male circumcision to combat heterosexual transmission of HIV in Australia, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 35, 5, (459-465), (2011).
- Seyed Reza Hosseini and Mohammad Ghasem Mohseni, Effect of Timing of Circumcision on Sexual Satisfaction and Function, Open Journal of Urology, 01, 01, (8), (2011).
- Pascale Lissouba, Dirk Taljaard, Dino Rech, Veerle Dermaux-Msimang, Camille Legeai, David Lewis, Beverley Singh, Adrian Puren and Bertran Auvert, Adult male circumcision as an intervention against HIV: An operational study of uptake in a South African community (ANRS 12126), BMC Infectious Diseases, 11, 1, (2011).
- Tim Hargreave, Male circumcision: towards a World Health Organisation normative practice in resource limited settings, Asian Journal of Andrology, 12, 5, (628), (2010).
- Luigi Gallo, Sisto Perdonà and Antonio Gallo, ORIGINAL RESEARCH—EJACULATORY DISORDERS: The Role of Short Frenulum and the Effects of Frenulectomy on Premature Ejaculation, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 3, (1269-1276), (2010).
- Andrew C. Peterson, Elective, adult circumcision does not affect patient perception of sexual health as defined by the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ), Journal of Men's Health, 7, 4, (368), (2010).
- Dawn K. Smith, Allan Taylor, Peter H. Kilmarx, Patrick Sullivan, Lee Warner, Mary Kamb, Naomi Bock, Bob Kohmescher and Timothy D. Mastro, Male Circumcision in the United States for the Prevention of HIV Infection and other Adverse Health Outcomes: Report from a CDC Consultation, Public Health Reports, 125, 1_suppl, (72), (2010).
- Christopher E. Keel, Phillip J. Dorsey, William Acker and Wayne J. G. Hellstrom, New Concepts in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Premature Ejaculation, Current Urology Reports, 11, 6, (414), (2010).
- Lisa Eaton and Seth C. Kalichman, Behavioral aspects of male circumcision for the prevention of HIV infection, Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 6, 4, (187), (2009).
- Juliet Richters, Bodies, pleasure and displeasure, Culture, Health & Sexuality, 11, 3, (225), (2009).
- Daniel D. Dugi and Allen F. Morey, Penoscrotal plication as a uniform approach to reconstruction of penile curvature, BJU International, 105, 10, (1440), (2009).
- John N. Krieger, Supriya D. Mehta, Robert C. Bailey, Kawango Agot, Jeckoniah O. Ndinya‐Achola, Corette Parker and Stephen Moses, ORIGINAL RESEARCH—MEN'S SEXUAL HEALTH: Adult Male Circumcision: Effects on Sexual Function and Sexual Satisfaction in Kisumu, Kenya, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 11, (2610-2622), (2008).
- Godfrey Kigozi, Stephen Watya, Chelsea B. Polis, Denis Buwembo, Valerian Kiggundu, Maria J. Wawer, David Serwadda, Fred Nalugoda, Noah Kiwanuka, Melanie C. Bacon, Victor Ssempijja, Frederick Makumbi and Ronald H. Gray, The effect of male circumcision on sexual satisfaction and function, results from a randomized trial of male circumcision for human immunodeficiency virus prevention, Rakai, Uganda, BJU International, 101, 1, (65-70), (2007).
- Limin Mao, David J. Templeton, June Crawford, John Imrie, Garrett P. Prestage, Andrew E. Grulich, Basil Donovan, John M. Kaldor and Susan C. Kippax, Does Circumcision Make a Difference to the Sexual Experience of Gay Men? Findings from the Health in Men (HIM) Cohort, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 11, (2557), (2008).
- Gary W Dowsett and Murray Couch, Male Circumcision and HIV Prevention: Is There Really Enough of the Right Kind of Evidence?, Reproductive Health Matters, 15, 29, (33), (2007).
- Robert Darby and J. Steven Svoboda, A Rose by Any Other Name? Rethinking the Similarities and Differences between Male and Female Genital Cutting, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 21, 3, (301), (2007).
- Robin Willcourt, THE EFFECT OF MALE CIRCUMCISION ON SEXUALITY, BJU International, 99, 5, (1169), (2007).
- George Hill, The case against circumcision, The Journal of Men's Health & Gender, 4, 3, (318), (2007).
- Avshalom Zoossmann-Diskin, Relation of male circumcision to cervical cancer, sexuality and female circumcision, The Journal of Men's Health & Gender, 4, 4, (448), (2007).




