Health Services Research

Organizational Silence and Hidden Threats to Patient Safety

Kerm Henriksen,

Department of Health and Human Services, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850

Address correspondence to Kerm Henriksen, Ph.D., Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Department of Health and Human Services, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850. Elizabeth Dayton, M.A., is with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Department of Health and Human Services, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850.

Search for more papers by this author
Elizabeth Dayton,

Department of Health and Human Services, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 June 2006
Citations: 115
Get access to the full version of this article. View access options below.
Institutional Login
Loading institution options...
Log in to Wiley Online Library

If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, please log in.

Purchase Instant Access
    • View the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures for a period of 48 hours.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article/chapter PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article/chapter can be printed.
    • Article/chapter can be downloaded.
    • Article/chapter can not be redistributed.

Abstract

Organizational silence refers to a collective-level phenomenon of saying or doing very little in response to significant problems that face an organization. The paper focuses on some of the less obvious factors contributing to organizational silence that can serve as threats to patient safety. Converging areas of research from the cognitive, social, and organizational sciences and the study of sociotechnical systems help to identify some of the underlying factors that serve to shape and sustain organizational silence. These factors have been organized under three levels of analysis: (1) individual factors, including the availability heuristic, self-serving bias, and the status quo trap; (2) social factors, including conformity, diffusion of responsibility, and microclimates of distrust; and (3) organizational factors, including unchallenged beliefs, the good provider fallacy, and neglect of the interdependencies. Finally, a new role for health care leaders and managers is envisioned. It is one that places high value on understanding system complexity and does not take comfort in organizational silence.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.