The Productivity and Cost‐Efficiency of Models for Involving Nurse Practitioners in Primary Care: A Perspective from Queueing Analysis
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials.
If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, Please log in.
If you previously purchased this article, Log in to Readcube.
You previously purchased this article on READCUBE_PURCHASE_DATE. Click on an option below to access.
Logged in as READCUBE_USER. Log out of ReadCube.
Abstract
Objective
To develop simple stylized models for evaluating the productivity and cost‐efficiencies of different practice models to involve nurse practitioners (NPs) in primary care, and in particular to generate insights on what affects the performance of these models and how.
Data Sources and Study Design
The productivity of a practice model is defined as the maximum number of patients that can be accounted for by the model under a given timeliness‐to‐care requirement; cost‐efficiency is measured by the corresponding annual cost per patient in that model. Appropriate queueing analysis is conducted to generate formulas and values for these two performance measures. Model parameters for the analysis are extracted from the previous literature and survey reports. Sensitivity analysis is conducted to investigate the model performance under different scenarios and to verify the robustness of findings.
Principal Findings
Employing an NP, whose salary is usually lower than a primary care physician, may not be cost‐efficient, in particular when the NP's capacity is underutilized. Besides provider service rates, workload allocation among providers is one of the most important determinants for the cost‐efficiency of a practice model involving NPs. Capacity pooling among providers could be a helpful strategy to improve efficiency in care delivery.
Conclusions
The productivity and cost‐efficiency of a practice model depend heavily on how providers organize their work and a variety of other factors related to the practice environment. Queueing theory provides useful tools to take into account these factors in making strategic decisions on staffing and panel size selection for a practice model.
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 13
- Xiang Zhong, Peter Hoonakker, Philip A. Bain, Albert J. Musa and Jingshan Li, The impact of e-visits on patient access to primary care, Health Care Management Science, 10.1007/s10729-017-9404-8, 21, 4, (475-491), (2017).
- Xiang Zhong, A queueing approach for appointment capacity planning in primary care clinics with electronic visits, IISE Transactions, 10.1080/24725854.2018.1486053, 50, 11, (970-988), (2018).
- Laserina O'Connor, Mary Casey, Rita Smith, Gerard M Fealy, Denise O' Brien, Denise O'Leary, Diarmuid Stokes, Martin S McNamara, Mary Ellen Glasgow and Andrew Cashin, The universal, collaborative and dynamic model of specialist and advanced nursing and midwifery practice: A way forward?, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27, 5-6, (e882-e894), (2018).
- Nan Liu, Stacey R. Finkelstein, Margaret E. Kruk and David Rosenthal, When Waiting to See a Doctor Is Less Irritating: Understanding Patient Preferences and Choice Behavior in Appointment Scheduling, Management Science, 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2704, 64, 5, (1975-1996), (2018).
- Otavio Bittencourt, Vedat Verter and Morty Yalovsky, Hospital capacity management based on the queueing theory, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67, 2, (224), (2018).
- Ying Xue and Jane Tuttle, Clinical productivity of primary care nurse practitioners in ambulatory settings, Nursing Outlook, 10.1016/j.outlook.2016.09.005, 65, 2, (162-171), (2017).
- Mary Casey, Laserina O'Connor, Andrew Cashin, Rita Smith, Denise O'Brien, Emma Nicholson, Denise O'Leary, Gerard Fealy, Martin McNamara, Mary Ellen Glasgow, Diarmuid Stokes and Claire Egan, An overview of the outcomes and impact of specialist and advanced nursing and midwifery practice, on quality of care, cost and access to services: A narrative review, Nurse Education Today, 56, (35), (2017).
- Ruth Martin-Misener, Kelley Kilpatrick, Faith Donald, Denise Bryant-Lukosius, Jennifer Rayner, Ruta Valaitis, Nancy Carter, Patricia A. Miller, Véronique Landry, Patricia Harbman, Renee Charbonneau-Smith, R. James McKinlay, Erin Ziegler, Sarah Boesveld and Alyson Lamb, Nurse practitioner caseload in primary health care: Scoping review, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 62, (170), (2016).
- Eileen A. Moran, Edesha Basa, Jian Gao, Denni Woodmansee, Peter L. Almenoff and Roderick S. Hooker, PA and NP productivity in the Veterans Health Administration, Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, 29, 7, (1), (2016).
- Verena Schadewaldt, Elizabeth McInnes, Janet E. Hiller and Anne Gardner, Investigating characteristics of collaboration between nurse practitioners and medical practitioners in primary healthcare: a mixed methods multiple case study protocol, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70, 5, (1184), (2014).
- Nan Liu, Stacey R. Finkelstein and Lusine Poghosyan, A new model for nurse practitioner utilization in primary care, Health Care Management Review, 39, 1, (10), (2014).
- Hessam Bavafa, Sergei Savin and Christian Terwiesch, Managing Patient Panels with Non‐Physician Providers, Production and Operations Management, , (2019).
- Arash Rashidian, Elham Shakibazadeh, Akram Karimi- Shahanjarini, Claire Glenton, Jane Noyes, Simon Lewin, Christopher J Colvin and Miranda Laurant, Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of doctor-nurse substitution strategies in primary care: qualitative evidence synthesis, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10.1002/14651858.CD010412, (2013).
