Presidential Studies Quarterly

Grover Cleveland, William McKinley, and the Emergence of the President as Party Leader

DANIEL P. KLINGHARD

Corresponding Author

College of the Holy Cross

Daniel P. Klinghard is assistant professor at the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Massachusetts.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 November 2005
Citations: 12

AUTHOR's NOTE: In addition to two very helpful anonymous reviewers, I would like to thank Jeremy Bailey, Donald Brand, Brian Cook, Morton Keller, Cheri Klinghard, Mark Landy, Sidney Milkis, Timothy Nokken, Howard Reiter, B. Jeffrey Reno, Jack Reynolds, and Steven Teles for their helpful comments on this article and its earlier incarnations.

Get access to the full version of this article. View access options below.
Institutional Login
Loading institution options...

If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, .

    • View the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures for a period of 48 hours.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article/chapter PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article/chapter can be printed.
    • Article/chapter can be downloaded.
    • Article/chapter can not be redistributed.

Abstract

The modern concept of the president as party leader emerged during the late nineteenth century. Through independent leadership of the party‐in‐the‐electorate, presidents enhanced their capacities to be renominated, and thus their capacity to be reelected. This popular leadership also enhanced the president's ability to shape the content of national electoral campaigns in ways not available to traditional party organizations. There is good reason to suggest that this development, rather than the emergence of the rhetorical presidency or the formalization of national administrative capacities, marks the origins of the modern presidency.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.