JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies
The New Intergovernmentalism: A Debate

The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post‐Maastricht Era

Christopher J. Bickerton

Corresponding Author

Cambridge University

Correspondence:

Christopher J. Bickerton

Department of Politics and International Studies (POLIS)

7 West Road

Cambridge CB3 9DT

UK

email: cb799@cam.ac.uk

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 September 2014
Citations: 218
The authors would like to thank the participants of two workshops at the Central European University in Budapest which were held in June 2012 and November 2013, during which the theoretical framework of the new intergovernmentalism was first explored and debated. Collaborative work with this group has led to the completion of an edited volume on the new intergovernmentalism (Bickerton et al., 2015). The authors gratefully acknowledge feedback from participants at panel sessions at the Passau UACES conference in September 2012, the Council for European Studies conference in Amsterdam in June 2013 and the conference of the ECPR Standing Group on the European Union in The Hague in June 2014. The authors would also like to thank Michelle Cini, co‐editor of JCMS, and the anonymous reviewers for their comments on the article. Any remaining errors are ours alone.
Get access to the full version of this article. View access options below.
Institutional Login
Loading institution options...

If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, .

    • View the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures for a period of 48 hours.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article/chapter PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article/chapter can be printed.
    • Article/chapter can be downloaded.
    • Article/chapter can not be redistributed.

Abstract

The post‐Maastricht period is marked by an integration paradox. While the basic constitutional features of the European Union have remained stable, EU activity has expanded to an unprecedented degree. This form of integration without supranationalism is no exception or temporary deviation from traditional forms of European integration. Rather, it is a distinct phase of European integration, what is called ‘the new intergovernmentalism’ in this article. This approach to post‐Maastricht integration challenges theories that associate integration with transfers of competences from national capitals to supranational institutions and those that reduce integration to traditional socioeconomic or security‐driven interests. This article explains the integration paradox in terms of transformations in Europe's political economy, changes in preference formation and the decline of the ‘permissive consensus’. It presents a set of six hypotheses that develop further the main claims of the new intergovernmentalism and that can be used as a basis for future research.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.