The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post‐Maastricht Era†
Corresponding Author
Cambridge University
Correspondence:
Christopher J. Bickerton
Department of Politics and International Studies (POLIS)
7 West Road
Cambridge CB3 9DT
UK
email: cb799@cam.ac.uk
Search for more papers by this authorBirkbeck, University of London
Search for more papers by this authorCentral European University
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Cambridge University
Correspondence:
Christopher J. Bickerton
Department of Politics and International Studies (POLIS)
7 West Road
Cambridge CB3 9DT
UK
email: cb799@cam.ac.uk
Search for more papers by this authorBirkbeck, University of London
Search for more papers by this authorCentral European University
Search for more papers by this authorInstitutional Login
If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, Please log in.
-
Details
- View the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures for a period of 48 hours.
- Article can not be printed.
- Article can not be downloaded.
- Article can not be redistributed.
-
Details
- Unlimited viewing of the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
- Article can not be printed.
- Article can not be downloaded.
- Article can not be redistributed.
-
Details
- Unlimited viewing of the article/chapter PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
- Article/chapter can be printed.
- Article/chapter can be downloaded.
- Article/chapter can not be redistributed.
Abstract
The post‐Maastricht period is marked by an integration paradox. While the basic constitutional features of the European Union have remained stable, EU activity has expanded to an unprecedented degree. This form of integration without supranationalism is no exception or temporary deviation from traditional forms of European integration. Rather, it is a distinct phase of European integration, what is called ‘the new intergovernmentalism’ in this article. This approach to post‐Maastricht integration challenges theories that associate integration with transfers of competences from national capitals to supranational institutions and those that reduce integration to traditional socioeconomic or security‐driven interests. This article explains the integration paradox in terms of transformations in Europe's political economy, changes in preference formation and the decline of the ‘permissive consensus’. It presents a set of six hypotheses that develop further the main claims of the new intergovernmentalism and that can be used as a basis for future research.




