The therapeutic dimension of research about spirituality: Particularities of cancer, mental health and infertility
CREATIVE CONTROVERSY
This section of Nursing Forum is set aside to allow for authors to propose “wild ideas” for our consideration. The purpose of a Creative Controversy is to break with traditional thinking and pose a new way of considering an issue. Sometimes these ideas are a small stretch of the imagination; other times they are radical departures from the norm. Both are designed to stimulate conversation about a topic that concerns the profession. We are pleased to bring readers this Creative Controversy.
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials.
If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, Please log in.
If you previously purchased this article, Log in to Readcube.
You previously purchased this article on READCUBE_PURCHASE_DATE. Click on an option below to access.
Logged in as READCUBE_USER. Log out of ReadCube.
Abstract
Healthcare is moving from a biomedical paradigm into a holistic paradigm, which includes all dimensions and needs of patients and families. Health conditions may trigger a spiritual journey for believers or non‐believers bringing to light the nature of the human being and its vulnerable condition. Healthcare professionals are full participants in this life and health scenario and have an unquestionable duty related to the provision of spiritual care, on the basis of legislation, ethical codes, and on research evidence. Researchers are seizing better and broader knowledge about spirituality in healthcare, and research about this phenomenon is growing internationally. But, spirituality is considered complex, an area of intimacy and deep subjective meaning. These factors may raise some ethical concerns when submitting research projects to the ethics committees. In this paper, the authors share their experience in research about spirituality in the beginning of life issues/infertility and with adults with severe health conditions, and describe participants’ perspectives on research engagement.
