The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Brief Communication
Free Access

The relationship between stem and branch wood specific gravity and the ability of each measure to predict leaf area*

Nathan G. Swenson

Corresponding Author

E-mail address:swenson@email.arizona.edu

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA

Author for correspondence (e‐mail:

swenson@email.arizona.edu

)
Search for more papers by this author
Brian J. Enquist

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 April 2008
Cited by: 53
*

The authors acknowledge Ian Wright in particular and the NESCent—ARC‐NZ Vegetation Function Wood Anatomy and Density Working Group in general for conversations that helped inspire this project. N.G.S. thanks J. Thompson, M. Aponte, and the staff at the El Verde Field Station for helping to make the study possible. N.G.S. was supported by the Galileo Circle Scholars Program and the Institute for the Study of Planet Earth at the University of Arizona. B.J.E. and N.G.S. were supported by an NSF CAREER Award to B.J.E.

Abstract

A few trait axes that represent differential biomass allocation may summarize plant life‐history strategies. Here we examine one of these axes described by wood specific gravity. Wood specific gravity represents the location of a species on a continuum of the rate of growth vs. the likelihood of mechanical failure, ranging from rapid volumetric growth/increased probability of mechanical failure to slow volumetric growth/decreased probability of mechanical failure. Wood specific gravity has been quantified primarily using three separate methods: a section from terminal branch, a section from the main stem or from a trunk wood core. What is unclear is how comparable these methods are and whether one or the other is a better predictor of other important plant traits such as leaf area. Here we measured stem and branch wood specific gravities from individual trees and shrubs in a tropical rain forest, quantified their relationship and determined their ability to predict leaf area. Stem and branch measures were highly correlated with each measure having a weak correlation with leaf area in trees and strong correlation with leaf area in shrubs. These results indicate that various methodologies for measuring wood specific gravity are comparable, and thus less destructive methods than are currently used are available to determine values for this important trait.

Over the past decade botanists have focused on identifying a few key plant traits that capture most of the overall variation in plant function (2; 8, 9; 21; 22; 23; 11; 24)). This work has highlighted a small number of key functional traits that represent differential plant biomass allocation. It is believed that these traits may provide novel insights into the ecology of plants (17; 10; 23; 27; 24; 19). Traits of interest include asymptotic plant height, seed mass, leaf area, foliar stoichiometry, specific leaf area (SLA: leaf area/leaf dry mass) and wood specific gravity.

Here we discuss just two of these traits, wood specific gravity and leaf area. Wood specific gravity has been identified as a key trait because it represents biomass allocation to stem tissue and it is correlated with growth and mortality (15; 7; 12). Specifically, species with lighter wood tend to have rapid volumetric growth rates with shorter life‐spans, while heavier wooded species tend to grow more slowly and have lower mortality rates. Variation in wood specific gravity also appears to be linked to stem hydraulic function (10). In particular, light wooded species tend to have higher hydraulic efficiency at the cost of higher vulnerability to embolism (10). Further, a growing number of studies have begun to report a negative relationship between wood specific gravity and leaf area (1; 3; 26, 25). Although this relationship is often reported, the mechanism underlying the correlation has been less well studied (26). One possibility is that lower wood specific gravity is linked to higher stem conductance, which can therefore support larger leaves, but this hypothesis still needs to be broadly tested (26). For these and other reasons, interest in intraspecific and interspecific variation in wood specific gravity continues to grow. As such, an increasing number of plant functional ecologists are now including this trait in their analyses, and large data sets are being compiled (4; 19).

Foresters have traditionally determined wood specific gravity by using large sections of trunks from harvested trees, but plant functional ecologists have used alternative methods. Specifically, plant functional ecologists have determined wood specific gravity from trunk cores and sections of twigs from large individuals and from sections of the basal stem from smaller individuals. This variability in methodology is a consequence of variability in plant life forms and the degree to which the researcher is willing to destructively sample the plant.

Although there are preexisting studies that examine the range of wood specific gravities in branches and stems within a single species (e.g., 13, 14), it is still unclear how correlated these measures are across many species. Thus we raise three unanswered questions. (1) How comparable are the values derived from alternative methods using different parts of a plant across multiple species? (2) Does one method provide values that correlate better with other functional traits that may covary with wood specific gravity such as leaf area? (3) Is it possible to estimate stem wood specific gravity by using a less destructive sampling methodology? The purpose of the current study was to address these questions by measuring wood specific gravity using multiple methodologies on the same individuals in a neotropical rain forest.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The current study was designed to test for the relationships between different measurements of wood specific gravity and how different measurements relate to mean leaf area. We examined 33 individual trees and 14 individual shrubs representing 27 species (Table 1) occurring in and around the El Verde Field Station located in the Luquillo Experimental Forest (LEF) in northeastern Puerto Rico (18.32°N, 65.82°W). The area of forest studied is a premontane moist forest with 3500 mm of annual precipitation with no distinct dry season.

Table 1. A list of the species and the number of individuals (No. inds.) included in the study.
Species Family No. inds. Life form
Alchornea latifolia Klotzsch Euphorbiaceae 2 Tree
Byrsonima wadsworthii Little Malpighiaceae 1 Tree
Casearia sylvestris Sw. Salicaceae 2 Tree
Dendropanax arboreus (L.)  Decne. & Planch Araliaceae 2 Tree
Eugenia stahlii Krug & Urb. Myrtaceae 1 Tree
Guatteria caribaea Urb. Annonaceae 2 Tree
Guettarda valenzuelana A.Rich. Rubiaceae 2 Tree
Henriettea fascicularis M.Gómez Melastomataceae 2 Tree
Manilkara bidentata (A.DC.)  A.Chev. Sapotaceae 2 Tree
Maytenus elongata Britton Celastraceae 2 Tree
Miconia laevigata Griseb. Melastomataceae 2 Tree
Ocotea leucoxylon Benth. & Hook.f. Lauraceae 2 Tree
Pterocarpus officinalis Jacq. Fabaceae 1 Tree
Quararibea turbinate Poir. Malvaceae 1 Tree
Samyda spinulosa Vent. Samydaceae 2 Tree
Sloanea berteriana Choisy ex DC. Elaeocarpaceae 2 Tree
Symplocos martinicensis Griseb. Symplocaceae 1 Tree
Syzygium jambos (L.) Alston Myrtaceae 2 Tree
Tetragastris balsamifera Kuntze Burseraceae 2 Tree
Coccoloba swartzii Meisn. Polygonaceae 1 Shrub
Hibiscus spp. Malvaceae 2 Shrub
Miconia prasina (Sw.) DC. Melastomataceae 2 Shrub
Myrcia leptoclada DC. Myrtaceae 2 Shrub
Piper blattarum Spreng. Piperaceae 2 Shrub
Piper umbellatum Vahl. Piperaceae 2 Shrub
Psychotria berteriana DC. Rubiaceae 2 Shrub
Psychotria grandis Sw. Rubiaceae 1 Shrub

We located 33 individual trees in the LEF that were between 10 cm and 20 cm in diameter at breast height (d.b.h.; 1.30 m off the ground). For these trees, we used an increment borer to extract a stem wood core ranging from 5 cm to 10 cm deep into the trunk. Upon returning from the field, the wet volume of the core (cm3) was determined by water displacement using a graduated cylinder (Archimedes method; 5). Next, using a pole clipper, we cut down a branch with radius approximately 1–2 cm in diameter on this same individual. Care was taken to sample branches that had sun‐exposed leaves. A basal wood section from the branch was collected as well as all of the leaves subtended by it. All bark was removed from the branch wood section in the field, and its wet volume was determined by water displacement in the laboratory. The water displacement method allowed for better estimates of wood volume for species with hollow branch sections by filling in large air spaces with water, while smaller air spaces were likely not filled causing a slight overestimation of wood volume (5). The wood cores and wood sections were then placed in a 60°C drying oven at the El Verde Field Station in the LEF. They were dried until a consistent mass (g) was achieved (5). This dry mass was then used to calculate the wood specific gravity (g/cm3) for the core or section. The fresh leaf area (cm2) for the subtended leaves was measured using a CI‐202 portable leaf area meter (CID, Camas, Washington, USA), and an average leaf area for the branch was calculated.

The 14 individual shrubs used in this study all had a d.b.h. of 1–2 cm and were collected from private lands just outside the LEF. For each individual, we cut a basal wood section from the main stem and a wood section from a primary branch (generally 0.4–0.6 cm diameter). Last, all leaves subtended by the branch were collected. Upon returning to the laboratory, we calculated the wood specific gravity and leaf area using the same methods described. All samples were collected and measured by the first author.

RESULTS

We measured stem and branch wood specific gravity for 33 individual trees and 14 individual shrubs in a Puerto Rican rain forest. In both cases, we found branch wood specific gravity to be a good predictor of stem wood specific gravity using a reduced major axis (RMA) regression (trees: r2 = 0.89; shrubs: r2 = 0.89; Fig. 1). This suggests that stem wood specific gravity could be estimated for the species in this study using branch sections without having to core the main stem of the tree or shrub. Using an ordinary least squares (OLS) regression forced through the origin, we wanted to determine whether branch sections tended to have higher or lower wood specific gravity and the degree to which this was predictable. We found the following regression equations that both suggest branch wood specific gravity was lower than stem wood specific gravity in the same individual and that this relationship was fairly consistent across species in this study. The tree equation was Swsg = 1.411⋅Bwsg, and the shrub equation was Swsg = 1.134⋅Bwsg. In each equation, Swsg represents stem wood specific gravity (wsg), and Bwsg represents branch wood specific gravity. Both regression equations explained large proportions of the variance (trees: r2 = 0.89; shrubs: r2 = 0.87).

image

The relationship between stem and branch wood specific gravity for individual trees (top) and shrubs (bottom). All statistical results reported are from reduced major axis (type II) regressions. CI = 95% confidence interval.

Stem and branch wood specific gravities in trees were not good predictors of leaf area, but the wood specific gravities of branches and stems in shrubs were good predictors of leaf area (Fig. 2). The exclusion of compound leaves from the tree data set improved the strength of the relationship mildly, but it was still much weaker than that found for shrubs. The RMA regression slopes for the leaf area–wood specific gravity relationships were indistinguishable between methodologies and life forms (Fig. 2). The slopes of the OLS and RMA regressions of leaf area on stem and branch wood specific gravity were dissimilar for trees and similar for shrubs (Fig. 2). In particular, the OLS slopes were shallower for the tree species studied.

image

The relationship between stem or branch wood specific gravity and the mean fresh leaf area of the subtended leaves. The dashed lines represent the ordinary least squares regression slopes, and the solid lines represent the reduced major axis (type II) regressions. All statistical results reported are from reduced major axis (type II) regressions. CI = 95% confidence interval. Note that this figure contains both species with simple and compound leaves.

DISCUSSION

A central goal in plant functional ecology has been to identify traits that represent plant functional strategies. The quantification of plant functional strategies may be used to provide information pertaining to species diversity, coexistence, and responses to abiotic gradients (18; 16; 8, 9; 21; 22; 23; 11; 24; 6; 20). Thus, many recent studies have focused on identifying important plant functional traits. Wood specific gravity represents one such trait. Because wood specific gravity is measured using a variety of methodologies, our goal in this article is to compare values derived from separate methodologies on the same individual. Further, we determined whether the strength of the correlation between wood specific gravity and another functional trait, leaf area, varied when using different methods for measuring wood specific gravity.

We have found that stem wood specific gravity can be adequately estimated from branch wood specific gravity in both shrubs and trees in the tropical rain forest species we studied. It is important to note that we did not sample all species of shrubs and trees in this forest, other life forms in this forest (i.e., lianas, hemiepiphytes), or species from other forests, and caution should be taken in extrapolating our results to other life forms or forests. Future studies will be needed to assess the generality of our findings. We have also found that stem and branch wood specific gravity have similarly poor abilities to predict leaf area in tree species. The relationship between leaf area and wood specific gravity was stronger for shrubs. Although the slopes of the RMA regressions plotting mean branch leaf area against stem and branch wood specific gravity were indistinguishable, the relationship was consistently weak across trees, thereby increasing the size of our confidence intervals.

The identification of a few central functional traits that are indicative of plant life‐history strategies has spurred an increasing number of studies quantifying these traits. As the collection of traits continues, it will be important to determine how comparable are trait values generated from alternative methodologies and whether less destructive routes can be taken to the same end. Here we have presented one such analysis that suggests various methodologies for measuring wood specific gravity are indeed comparable in the species studied presently and less destructive methods may potentially be used to determine values for this important trait. Future work focusing on other life forms, forest types, and regions will help further elucidate whether less destructive sampling methodologies can be broadly used to estimate stem wood specific gravity.

Notes :

  • 1 The authors acknowledge Ian Wright in particular and the NESCent—ARC‐NZ Vegetation Function Wood Anatomy and Density Working Group in general for conversations that helped inspire this project. N.G.S. thanks J. Thompson, M. Aponte, and the staff at the El Verde Field Station for helping to make the study possible. N.G.S. was supported by the Galileo Circle Scholars Program and the Institute for the Study of Planet Earth at the University of Arizona. B.J.E. and N.G.S. were supported by an NSF CAREER Award to B.J.E.

Number of times cited: 53

  • , Inter‐ and intraspecific variation in mangrove carbon fraction and wood specific gravity in Gazi Bay, Kenya, Ecosphere, 9, 6, (2018).
  • , Plant diversity and local environmental conditions indirectly affect litter decomposition in a tropical forest, Applied Soil Ecology, 10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.09.016, (2018).
  • , Conifer tree‐ring density inter‐annual variability – anatomical, physiological and environmental determinants, New Phytologist, 216, 3, (621-625), (2017).
  • , Structure and allometry in tropical forests of Chocó, Colombia, Forest Ecology and Management, 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.048, 405, (309-318), (2017).
  • , Tree functional types simplify forest carbon stock estimates induced by carbon concentration variations among species in a subtropical area, Scientific Reports, 7, 1, (2017).
  • , Compatible System for Predicting Total and Merchantable Stem Volume over and under Bark, Branch Volume and Whole-Tree Volume of Pine Species, Forests, 8, 11, (417), (2017).
  • , Reaching the canopy on the ground: incidence of infection and host-use by mistletoes (Loranthaceae and Viscaceae) on trees felled for timber in Amazonian rainforests, Plant Ecology, 218, 3, (251), (2017).
  • , Centralized Statistics Courses at SMU: opportunity and advantage for SOR; research benefits for SMU, Environmental Economics, 10.21511/ee.08(4).2017.05, 8, 4, (37-43), (2017).
  • , Interspecific Functional Convergence and Divergence and Intraspecific Negative Density Dependence Underlie the Seed-to-Seedling Transition in Tropical Trees, The American Naturalist, 187, 1, (99), (2016).
  • , Review of allometric equations for major land covers in SE Asia: Uncertainty and implications for above- and below-ground carbon estimates, Forest Ecology and Management, 360, (323), (2016).
  • , Wood density and moisture sorption and its influence on large wood mobility in rivers, CATENA, 10.1016/j.catena.2016.02.001, 140, (182-194), (2016).
  • , The relationship between trunk- and twigwood density shifts with tree size and species stature, Forest Ecology and Management, 372, (137), (2016).
  • , Trait coordination, mechanical behaviour and growth form plasticity ofAmborella trichopodaunder variation in canopy openness, AoB Plants, 8, (plw068), (2016).
  • , Linking individual‐level functional traits to tree growth in a subtropical forest, Ecology, 97, 9, (2396-2405), (2016).
  • , A generalized tree component biomass model derived from principles of variable allometry, Forest Ecology and Management, 354, (43), (2015).
  • , Forest carbon in lowland Papua New Guinea: Local variation and the importance of small trees, Austral Ecology, 40, 2, (151-159), (2014).
  • , A vertically integrated whole-tree biomass model, Trees, 29, 2, (449), (2015).
  • , Bark ecology of twigs vs. main stems: functional traits across eighty-five species of angiosperms, Oecologia, 178, 4, (1033), (2015).
  • , Predicting wood fiber attributes using local-scale metrics from terrestrial LiDAR data: A case study of Newfoundland conifer species, Forest Ecology and Management, 347, (116), (2015).
  • , Fine root morphology is phylogenetically structured, but nitrogen is related to the plant economics spectrum in temperate trees, Functional Ecology, 29, 6, (796-807), (2014).
  • , Bark functional ecology: evidence for tradeoffs, functional coordination, and environment producing bark diversity, New Phytologist, 201, 2, (486-497), (2013).
  • , Densidade da madeira de árvores em savanas do norte da Amazônia brasileira, Acta Amazonica, 44, 1, (79), (2014).
  • , New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide, Australian Journal of Botany, 61, 3, (167), (2013).
  • , Uncovering multiscale effects of aridity and biotic interactions on the functional structure of Mediterranean shrublands, Journal of Ecology, 101, 3, (637-649), (2013).
  • , Changes in wood density, wood anatomy and hydraulic properties of the xylem along the root-to-shoot flow path in tropical rainforest trees, Tree Physiology, 33, 2, (161), (2013).
  • , Disentangling Coordination among Functional Traits Using an Individual-Centred Model: Impact on Plant Performance at Intra- and Inter-Specific Levels, PLoS ONE, 8, 10, (e77372), (2013).
  • , The biogeography and filtering of woody plant functional diversity in North and South America, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 21, 8, (798-808), (2011).
  • , Temporal turnover in the composition of tropical tree communities: functional determinism and phylogenetic stochasticity, Ecology, 93, 3, (490-499), (2012).
  • , Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co‐occurring tropical tree species, Functional Ecology, 26, 1, (274-282), (2011).
  • , Tropical tree growth is correlated with soil phosphorus, potassium, and calcium, though not for legumes, Ecological Monographs, 82, 2, (189-203), (2012).
  • , Phylogenetic and functional alpha and beta diversity in temperate and tropical tree communities, Ecology, 93, sp8, (S112-S125), (2012).
  • , Testing the metabolic theory of ecology, Ecology Letters, 15, 12, (1465-1474), (2012).
  • , Plant Biomass Allocation across a Precipitation Gradient: An Approach to Seasonally Dry Tropical Forest at Yucatán, Mexico, Ecosystems, 15, 8, (1234), (2012).
  • , Sapwood to heartwood ratio affects whole-tree water use in dry forest legume and non-legume trees, Trees, 26, 4, (1317), (2012).
  • , The Functional Ecology and Diversity of Tropical Tree Assemblages through Space and Time: From Local to Regional and from Traits to Transcriptomes, ISRN Forestry, 2012, (1), (2012).
  • , Ontogenetic modulation of branch size, shape, and biomechanics produces diversity across habitats in the Bursera simaruba clade of tropical trees, Evolution & Development, 14, 5, (437-449), (2012).
  • , Spatial patterns of wood traits in China are controlled by phylogeny and the environment, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20, 2, (241-250), (2010).
  • , Wood specific gravity of some tree species in the Garhwal Himalayas, India, Forestry Studies in China, 13, 3, (225), (2011).
  • , Carbon storage potential of harvested wood: summary and policy implications, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 16, 3, (307), (2011).
  • , Variation in leaf functional trait values within and across individuals and species: an example from a Costa Rican dry forest, Functional Ecology, 24, 1, (217-223), (2009).
  • , Interspecific relationships among growth, mortality and xylem traits of woody species from New Zealand, Functional Ecology, 24, 2, (253-262), (2009).
  • , Predicting branch to bole volume scaling relationships from varying centroids of tree bole volume, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 40, 12, (2278), (2010).
  • , Measuring wood specific gravity…Correctly, American Journal of Botany, 97, 3, (519-524), (2010).
  • , Angiosperm wood structure: Global patterns in vessel anatomy and their relation to wood density and potential conductivity, American Journal of Botany, 97, 2, (207-215), (2010).
  • , Above‐ground forest biomass is not consistently related to wood density in tropical forests, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 18, 5, (617-625), (2009).
  • , Opposing assembly mechanisms in a Neotropical dry forest: implications for phylogenetic and functional community ecology, Ecology, 90, 8, (2161), (2009).
  • , Herbaceous monocot plant form and function along a tropical rain-forest light gradient: a reversal of dicot strategy, Journal of Tropical Ecology, 25, 01, (103), (2009).
  • , Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum, Ecology Letters, 12, 4, (351-366), (2009).
  • , Leaf Trait Diversification and Design in Seven Rare Taxa of the HawaiianPlantagoRadiation, International Journal of Plant Sciences, 170, 1, (61), (2009).
  • , Universal foliage‐stem scaling across environments and species in dicot trees: plasticity, biomechanics and Corner’s Rules, Ecology Letters, 12, 3, (210-219), (2009).
  • , Wood anatomy and wood density in shrubs: Responses to varying aridity along transcontinental transects, American Journal of Botany, 96, 8, (1388-1398), (2009).
  • , Relative Crystallinity of Plant Biomass: Studies on Assembly, Adaptation and Acclimation, PLoS ONE, 3, 8, (e2897), (2008).
  • , Carbon Storage in Secondary Mangroves along the West Coastline of Maputo City, Mozambique, Wetlands, 10.1007/s13157-018-1104-8, (2018).