Government effectiveness and support for democracy
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials.
If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, Please log in.
If you previously purchased this article, Log in to Readcube.
You previously purchased this article on READCUBE_PURCHASE_DATE. Click on an option below to access.
Logged in as READCUBE_USER. Log out of ReadCube.
Abstract
Diffuse support for democracy, as captured in mass surveys, tends to be treated as impervious to regime performance. Such a finding is often presented as confirmation of the basic distinction between ‘diffuse’ and ‘specific’ support as proposed by David Easton. This study argues that this line of argument stems from an incomplete reading of important aspects of Easton's theorisation about the relationship between system outputs and diffuse support. Using multilevel models, evidence from more than 100 surveys in close to 80 countries, and different measures of democratic support, it is shown that government effectiveness is the strongest macro‐level predictor of such support. In democratic regimes, government effectiveness, understood as the quality of policy‐making formulation and implementation, is linked to higher levels of support for democracy. Furthermore, in non‐democracies, effectiveness and support for democracy are, under some model specifications, negatively related.
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 24
- Hanspeter Kriesi, The implications of the euro crisis for democracy, Journal of European Public Policy, 25, 1, (59), (2018).
- Gustavo Gouvêa Maciel and Luís de Sousa, Legal Corruption and Dissatisfaction with Democracy in the European Union, Social Indicators Research, 10.1007/s11205-017-1779-x, 140, 2, (653-674), (2017).
- Wen-Chun Chang, Media Use and Satisfaction with Democracy: Testing the Role of Political Interest, Social Indicators Research, 10.1007/s11205-017-1806-y, 140, 3, (999-1016), (2017).
- Petter Christiansen, Public support of transport policy instruments, perceived transport quality and satisfaction with democracy. What is the relationship?, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 10.1016/j.tra.2018.09.010, 118, (305-318), (2018).
- Stefan Dahlberg and Jonas Linde, Socialization or Experience? Institutional Trust and Satisfaction with Democracy among Emigrants in Different Institutional Settings, The Journal of Politics, 10.1086/698661, 80, 4, (1389-1393), (2018).
- Gabriel Katz and Ines Levin, Varieties of political support in emerging democracies: A cross-national analysis, Social Science Research, 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.11.002, 70, (55-70), (2018).
- Paul Pennings, When and where did the great recession erode the support of democracy?, Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 11, 1, (81), (2017).
- Diego Muro and Guillem Vidal, Political mistrust in southern Europe since the Great Recession, Mediterranean Politics, 22, 2, (197), (2017).
- Atle Haugsgjerd, Political distrust amidst The Great Recession: The mitigating effect of welfare state effort, Comparative European Politics, (2017).
- Frida Boräng, Marina Nistotskaya and Georgios Xezonakis, The quality of government determinants of support for democracy, Journal of Public Affairs, 17, 1-2, (2017).
- Edalina Rodrigues Sanches and Ekaterina Gorbunova, Portuguese Citizens’ Support for Democracy: 40 Years after the Carnation Revolution, South European Society and Politics, 21, 2, (211), (2016).
- Mario Quaranta, The Meaning of Democracy to Citizens Across European Countries and the Factors Involved, Social Indicators Research, (2016).
- Guillermo Cordero and Pablo Simón, Economic Crisis and Support for Democracy in Europe, West European Politics, 39, 2, (305), (2016).
- Pedro C. Magalhães, Economic Evaluations, Procedural Fairness, and Satisfaction with Democracy, Political Research Quarterly, 69, 3, (522), (2016).
- Francesco Pasimeni and Paolo Pasimeni, An Institutional Analysis of the Europe 2020 Strategy, Social Indicators Research, 127, 3, (1021), (2016).
- Stefan Dahlberg and Jonas Linde, Losing Happily? The Mitigating Effect of Democracy and Quality of Government on the Winner–Loser Gap in Political Support, International Journal of Public Administration, 39, 9, (652), (2016).
- Eva H. Önnudóttir, Styles of Representation and Voters’ Evaluations of Democratic Performance: Parties and Party Voters, Representation, 52, 2-3, (191), (2016).
- Stefan Dahlberg, Jonas Linde and Sören Holmberg, Democratic Discontent in Old and New Democracies: Assessing the Importance of Democratic Input and Governmental Output, Political Studies, 63, 1_suppl, (18), (2015).
- André Freire, Eftichia Teperoglou and Catherine Moury, Awakening the Sleeping Giant in Greece and Portugal? Elites' and Voters' Attitudes towards EU Integration in Difficult Economic Times, South European Society and Politics, 19, 4, (477), (2014).
- Conceição Pequito Teixeira, Emmanouil Tsatsanis and Ana Maria Belchior, Support for Democracy in Times of Crisis: Diffuse and Specific Regime Support in Portugal and Greece, South European Society and Politics, 19, 4, (501), (2014).
- Luís de Sousa, Pedro C. Magalhães and Luciano Amaral, Sovereign Debt and Governance Failures, American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 12, (1517), (2014).
- MAIJA JÄSKE, Participatory innovations and maxi‐publics: The influence of participation possibilities on perceived legitimacy at the local level in Finland, European Journal of Political Research, , (2018).
- Lea Heyne, Democratic demand and supply: a spatial model approach to satisfaction with democracy, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 10.1080/17457289.2018.1544904, (1-21), (2018).
- Christian Houle and Michael K. Miller, Social Mobility and Democratic Attitudes: Evidence From Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa, Comparative Political Studies, 10.1177/0010414019830719, (001041401983071), (2019).
