European Journal of Oral Sciences
Original Article

A multi‐country comparison of reasons for dental non‐attendance

Stefan Listl

Corresponding Author

Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Munich Center for the Economics of Aging, Max‐Planck‐Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Munich, Germany

Stefan Listl, Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

E‐mail: stefan.listl@med.uni-heidelberg.de

Search for more papers by this author
John Moeller

Division of Health Services Research, Department of Health Promotion and Policy, Dental School, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Richard Manski

Division of Health Services Research, Department of Health Promotion and Policy, Dental School, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 October 2013
Cited by: 36
Get access to the full version of this article.View access options below.

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials.

If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, .

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe differences across countries with respect to the reasons for dental non‐attendance by Europeans currently 50 yr of age and older. The analyses were based on retrospective life‐history data from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe and included information on various reasons why respondents from 13 European countries had never had regular dental visits in their lifetime. A series of logistic regression models was estimated to identify reasons for dental non‐attendance across different welfare‐state regimes. The highest proportion of respondents without any regular dental attendance throughout their lifetime was found for the Southern welfare‐state regime, followed by the Eastern, the Bismarckian, and the Scandinavian welfare‐state regimes. Factors such as patients’ perception that regular dental treatment is ‘not necessary’ or ‘not usual’ appear to be the predominant reason for non‐attendance in all welfare‐state regimes. The health system‐level factor ‘no place to receive this type of care close to home’ and the perception of regular dental treatment as ‘not necessary’ were more often referred to within the Southern, Eastern, and Bismarckian welfare‐state regimes than in Scandinavia. This could be relevant information for health‐care decision makers in order to prioritize interventions towards increasing rates of regular dental attendance.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.