Hearing loss and history of otolaryngological conditions in adults with microdeletion 22q11.2

Previous studies have shown that the 22q11.2 microdeletion, associated with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS), conveys an increased risk of chronic otitis media, and hearing loss at young age. This study reports on hearing loss and history of otolaryngological conditions in adults with 22q11.2DS. We conducted a retrospective study of 60 adults with 22q11.2DS (41.7% male) at median age 25 (range 16–74) years who had visited an otolaryngologist and audiologist for routine assessment at a 22q11.2 expert center. Demographic, genetic, audiometric, and otolaryngological data were systematically extracted from the medical files. Regression analysis was used to evaluate the effect of age, sex, full‐scale intelligence quotient, and history of chronic otitis media on the severity of hearing loss. Hearing loss, mostly high‐frequency sensorineural, was found in 78.3% of adults. Higher age and history of chronic otitis media were associated with more severe hearing loss. Otolaryngological conditions with possible treatment implications included chronic otitis media (56.7%), globus pharyngeus (18.3%), balance problems (16.7%), and obstructive sleep apnea (8.3%). The results suggest that in 22q11.2DS, high‐frequency hearing loss appears to be common from a young adult age, and often unrecognized. Therefore, we recommend periodic audiometric screening in all adults, including high‐frequency ranges.

Therefore, we aimed to study the prevalence and predictors of hearing loss in adults with 22q11.2DS.We hypothesized that the severity of hearing loss would be greater in those with higher age, with history of chronic otitis media, and with lower full-scale IQ (FSIQ), based on previous research (Golub et al., 2020a(Golub et al., , 2020b;;Zarchi et al., 2011).Secondary aims were to investigate lifetime history of other otolaryngological conditions in 22q11.2DS.

| Editorial policies and ethical considerations
The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Review Board of MUMC+ (#2019-1440, METC 19-044/NL70681.068.19) that waived the need for written consent to use pseudonymized clinical data.

| Study design and setting
This was a retrospective study of otolaryngological conditions in patients who visited the Dutch expert clinic for adults with 22q11.2DS at Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+), The Netherlands, between January 2016 and April 2023.
We used available medical information to record data on demographics, molecular diagnosis, lifetime history of otolaryngological conditions, and most recent FSIQ score.All patients were routinely evaluated by an otolaryngologist and audiologist.Standard examinations included a semi-structured interview, a complete ear, nose, and throat examination, and audiometric testing.Two had their most recent audiogram at MUMC+ before 2016.

| Audiological assessments
Data for audiological assessments included pure-tone air and bone conduction (BC) audiometry.Unaided ear-specific hearing thresholds were measured from 0.25 to 8 kHz with pure-tone audiometry.Presence/absence and severity of hearing loss were classified with the Muenster classification because this classification includes criteria for high-frequency hearing loss (Table 1) (Schmidt et al., 2007), that was often found in adults with 22q11.2DS.Thus, hearing loss was defined as having loss with a severity of grade two or higher (Schmidt et al., 2007).Type and laterality of hearing loss, frequency ranges, and audiometric configuration were classified using the European Working Group on the Genetics of Hearing Impairment definitions (Mazzoli et al., 2009).Because most of the audiometric abnormalities in the 22q11.2DSsample concerned the high frequencies, adaptations were made to these definitions, that is: (1) we averaged the pure-tone hearing thresholds over 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz instead of 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz, to define type and laterality of hearing loss, (2) we introduced n-shaped configurations in order to classify patients that performed best at the mid-frequencies, and (3) in addition to the standard criteria for gently and steeply sloping, we considered audiometric configurations showing a decrease in ≥15-29 dB HL or ≥30 dB HL between 4 and 8 kHz gently-and steeply-sloping as well (Table 1).

| Tympanometry
If deemed to be indicated, tympanometry was used to measure the tympanic membrane's response to changes in pressure in order to detect effusion or depression in the middle ear.Abnormal responses were classified using the Jerger classification that was adapted for adults (Margolis & Heller, 1987).

| Statistical analyses
For hearing loss and history of otolaryngological conditions, we calculated prevalence rates and related 95% confidence intervals (CIs) . We calculated the prevalence of hearing loss of at least one ear, as well as of the betterhearing ear.We used ordinal regression analysis to evaluate the effect of age, sex, FSIQ, and history of chronic otitis media on the severity of hearing loss according to the Muenster classification.For this analysis, we used the better-hearing ear, in line with the European Working Group on the Genetics of Hearing Impairment definitions (Mazzoli et al., 2009)

| Audiometry
Table 2 shows data on audiological assessments.Hearing loss in at least 1 ear was found in 47 adults (78.3%) with 22q11.2DS of whom 8 had unilateral hearing loss.Of the better-hearing ear, 39 adults (65.0%) showed hearing loss that was mostly limited to the high frequencies (n = 25, 41.7%).In 14 adults (23.3%), more severe hearing loss was found that also included loss at the mid-frequencies.Because of missing BC thresholds that were not measured at 6 and 8 kHz, the Hearing loss, grading of severity a Normal or borderline hearing (0-1) ≤20 dB HL over all frequencies Loss, limited to high-frequencies ( 2 type of hearing loss could not be established in 18 of 39 adults (46.2%).Of those with hearing loss, sensorineural loss was most common (n = 14 out of 21 with data, 66.7%).The audiometric configuration that was observed most, was flat (n = 27, 45.0%, Figure 1).
Plots of individual sensory thresholds showed that the majority of adults with 22q11.2DShad sensory thresholds that were higher, meaning the stimulus needed to be stronger, than 90% of the norm population (Figure 2).For the mid-frequency of 1 kHz, 52 adults (86.7%) had sensory thresholds higher than 50%, and 25 (41.7%) had sensory thresholds higher than 90% of the norm population.At 8 kHz, 56 adults (93.3%) had sensory threshold higher than 50%, and 55 (91.7%) had sensory thresholds higher than 90% of the norm population.

| DISCUSSION
The  history of otolaryngological conditions that were frequently reported included chronic otitis media, globus pharyngeus, swallowing difficulties, balance problems, and OSA.

| Hearing loss
The proportion of adults with hearing loss (78.3%) was much higher in comparison to two previous studies in adults with 22q11.2DSthat reported hearing loss in 28.5% and 40.9%, respectively (Bassett et al., 2005;Persson et al., 2012).However, when interpreting the findings, it is important to take into account the study designs, definitions for hearing loss, and age and size of the samples in the different studies.
The first study was a retrospective chart review in 78 adults at a mean age of 31.5 ± 10.5 years, and included those with hearing loss reported in the medical records (Bassett et al., 2005).No audiological assessments were reported.The proportion of adults with a documented history of hearing loss was similar to this study (28.5% vs 31.7%).In the second study, 22 of 24 adults underwent an audiological assessment at a mean age of 25 (range 19-38) years (Persson et al., 2012).The same definition for hearing loss was used as in this study.However, in the current study hearing was measured up to eight, instead of six, kHz.Unilateral conductive hearing loss was found in a much higher proportion of the patients (44.4% vs. 12.8%) compared to this study.However, absolute numbers were low affecting reliability of those findings, and results were possibly influenced by a few younger participants (Persson et al., 2012).
a Seven adults with 22q11.2DS received speech-language therapy for both speech and feeding/ swallowing issues.

| Potential contributors to hearing loss in 22q11.2DS
There are several potential contributors to hearing loss in adults with 22q11DS (Tian & Johnson, 2020;Verheij et al., 2017).First, chronic otitis media, with or without congenital inner ear abnormalities (Loos et al., 2016), may result in the cochlea being more vulnerable in patients with 22q11.2DScompared to the general population (van Eynde et al., 2016;Verheij et al., 2017).Second, early physiological degeneration and other medical conditions and their treatment, may lead to hearing loss (Huang & Tang, 2010).Age-related disorders such as Parkinson's disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus (Boot et al., 2018;Van et al., 2020), and multimorbidity and polypharmacy are often seen in 22q11.2DSat a relatively young age (Malecki et al., 2020).Third, genetic susceptibility should be considered (Huang & Tang, 2010).For example, young-onset and age-related hearing loss has been reported in other genetic neurodevelopmental disorders, such as in Down syndrome (Picciotti et al., 2017), and Turner syndrome (Bonnard et al., 2017).Importantly, findings may be specific per genetic variant.
When comparing the sensory thresholds found in Turner syndrome to those reported in 22q11.2DS it is striking that adults with Turner syndrome scored worst at the mid-frequency (2 kHz) (King et al., 2007), whereas adults with 22q11.2DSperformed best at the midfrequencies and worst at the highest and lowest frequencies.
Genes that may possibly play a role in 22q11.2DSinclude TBX1 and genes involved in mitochondrial function (Keithley, 2020;Tian & Johnson, 2020).TBX1 is involved in the development of the vascular system including the stria vascularis (an important cochlear structure that is rich in vascular tissue), the central nervous system, and the semicircular canal (Baldini et al., 2017;Tian & Johnson, 2020).In mice with a homozygous missense mutation in Tbx1 inner ear malformations, an undeveloped stria vascularis, and deafness have been found (Tian & Johnson, 2020).Other candidate genes include those involved in mitochondrial function; at least six lie within the 22q11.2region (Motahari et al., 2019).Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress have been proposed as possible contributors to degenerative changes in the cochlear duct (i.e., in the stria vascularis, hair cells, and neurons) which may result in age-related hearing loss (Keithley, 2020).

| Clinical implications of the hearing findings
High-frequency hearing loss makes it more difficult to understand speech with background noise, for example, during group conversations, and to localize sounds (Huang & Tang, 2010).It often precedes and is a predictor of, hearing loss at the lower frequencies (Dubno et al., 2013).Similarly, loss at the mid-frequencies may negatively affect daily life functioning by reduced understanding of speech or hearing in traffic.If diagnosed late, hearing loss may contribute to the development of depressive symptoms, stress, anxiety, social isolation, and reduced quality of life (Chia et al., 2007;Jayakody et al., 2018).

| History of otolaryngological conditions
In this study, chronic otitis media was the most prevalent otolaryngological condition, with an occurrence comparable to what has been previously reported in 22q11.2DS(Grasso et al., 2018;Verheij et al., 2017).The results of this study are also in line with the existing literature that indicates that swallowing issues, relating to globus pharyngeus in some, are an important feature of 22q11.2DSacross the lifespan (Eicher et al., 2000;Grasso et al., 2018;Welby et al., 2020;Wong et al., 2020).Because individuals with 22q11.2DSmay not complain, careful history taking for swallowing issues is important.
Balance problems, reported in some adults in this and a previous study (Willaert et al., 2019), may relate to abnormalities of the vestibulum, cerebellum, and/or proprioceptive system, lower muscle strength, and/or visual problems (Enkelaar et al., 2012;Loos et al., 2016;Rogdaki et al., 2020;Willaert et al., 2019).Movement disorders, such as Parkinson's disease, may also be considered in older adults with 22q11.2DS(Boot et al., 2022;Willaert et al., 2019).The occurrence of OSA in this study was comparable to that previously reported in children and adults with 22q11.2DS(Cancelliere et al., 2023;Kennedy et al., 2014).OSA can have a negative effect on quality of life, and may increase the risk of several diseases including cardiovascular and pulmonary systems (Gottlieb & Punjabi, 2020).
We recommend otolaryngological examination at least once for adults with 22q11.2DS.Special attention should be paid to conditions that may present at adult age and may have treatment implications, such as OSA (Boot et al., 2023;Cancelliere et al., 2023), globus pharyngeus (Khalil et al., 2003), dysphagia, and vestibular dysfunction.

| Strengths and limitations
To our knowledge, this is the largest sample of adults with 22q11.2DSwho received audiometric testing and standardized otolaryngological examinations.Limitations of the study mainly relate to the retrospective design.On the one hand, data concerning the medical history may not be complete resulting in an underestimation of some otolaryngological conditions.On the other hand, referral bias may have resulted in higher prevalence rates because adults with 22q11.2DSwith a more severe clinical presentation may be more likely to be referred to a 22q11 specialty clinic.In addition, some adults did not have audiometric results because of difficulties with performing the test or noncooperation, which may have influenced results.Due to the study design and sample size, it was not possible to assess for possible contributions of other causes of hearing loss such as noise exposure and impact on daily living.Last, given the relatively small number of adults with data regarding type of hearing loss (21 of 39 adults with (<20 dB HL) and ABG >15 dB averaged over 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz Sensorineural BC thresholds >20 dB HL and ABG <15 dB HL averaged over 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz Mixed BC thresholds >20 dB HL and ABG >15 dB averaged over 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHzAudiometric configuration bLow-frequency ascending >15 dB HL difference between the worst low-frequency thresholds and the better high-frequency thresholds Mid-frequency n-shaped >15 dB HL difference between the best mid-frequency thresholds and the worse low and high-frequency thresholdsHigh-frequencyGently sloping 15-29 dB HL difference between the mean of 0.5 and 1 kHz and the mean of 4 and 8 kHz, or 15-29 dB HL between 4 and 8 kHzSteeply sloping ≥30 dB HL difference between the above frequencies or ≥30 dB HL between 4 and 8 kHz Flat <15 dB HL difference between the mean of 0.25 and 1 kHz, the mean of 1 and 2 kHz, and the mean of 4 and ≤2 kHz High-frequencies >2 kHz and ≤8 kHz Symmetry of hearing impairment Unilateral >10 dB HL difference between the ears in at least two frequencies <20 dB HL average over 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz of the better ear Bilateral symmetrical <10 dB HL difference between the ears in at least two frequencies.Average over 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz of both ears >20 dB Bilateral asymmetrical >10 dB HL difference between the ears in at least two frequencies >20 dB HL average over 0.5, 1,2, and 4 kHz of the better ear Note: Adapted from the definitions by the European Working Group on the Genetics of Hearing Impairment (see Section 2 for details)(Mazzoli et al., 2009).Abbreviations: ABG, air-bone gap; BC, bone conduction; dB, decibel; HL, hearing level; kHz, kilo Hertz.a Severity of hearing loss according to the Muenster classification(Schmidt et al., 2007).b Of the better-hearing ear.

F
I G U R E 1 Audiometric configurations of 60 adults with 22q11.2deletion syndrome.Audiometric configurations were mostly flat (45%), or high-frequency steeply (23.3%) or gently (18.3%) sloping.The dotted horizontal line represents the threshold for normal hearing ≤20 dB HL: the colored dots above the dotted line represent a result for a participant with normal hearing.dB HL, decibel hearing level; kHz, kilo Hertz.F I G U R E 2 Individual sensory thresholds of the better-hearing ear in 60 adults with 22q11.2deletion syndrome.Individual sensory thresholds of the better-hearing ear plotted against 90th and 50th percentiles obtained from normative data for 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz (ISO, 2017).Orange dots indicate the sensory thresholds of the study participants relative to (90% and 50% of, respectively) the norm population.Black horizontal lines indicate the threshold for normal hearing at 20 dB HL. dB HL, decibel hearing level; kHz, kilo Hertz.
(Schmidt et al., 2007)involving a relatively young adult sample of 22q11.2DSindicatethat a large proportion of adults with 22q11.2DShavehearingloss, mostly limited to the higher frequencies, and often unrecognized.Age and a history of chronic otitis media, but not sex or FSIQ, were positively related to the severity of hearing loss.Lifetime T A B L E 2 a Severity according to the Muenster classification(Schmidt et al., 2007).b Proportions of a total of 21 out of 39 adults with hearing loss of the better-hearing ear; hearing loss limited to the high-frequencies could not be classified in the other 18 adults mainly due to missing BC thresholds at 6 and 8 kHz.