The analgesic and antidepressant properties of dihydroartemisinine in the neuropathic pain mice: By the downregulation of HnRNPA1 in the spinal cord and hippocampus

Dear Editor, Neuropathic pain (NP) is far from effectively treated. The failures are more associated with the emotional, rather than the sensory aspects.1 Therefore, the painemotion co-curation is of primary importance.2 Our team revealed the analgesic and antidepressant properties of dihydroartemisinine (DHA) in the spinal cord ligation (SNL) mice;3 clarified that the synergistic regulations of TNFα in the spinal cord (SP) and hippocampus (CA3) may explain for the inhibitions of the C-fiber long-term potentiation (LTP) in the SP and the repairs of CA3 pyramidal neurons; identified heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteinA1 (HnRNPA1) as the binding target of DHA, bywhich DHA regulate the expression of TNFα (Figure 1A). The analgesic and antidepressant effects were evaluated in the first-line drug pregabalin (PGB,45 mg/kg), duloxetine (DLT, 9 mg/kg) and DHA (H-14.5 mg/kg, M-7.25 mg/kg, L-3.625 mg/kg) groups. Shown by Von Frey tests, the 14-day oral application of DHA attenuated the allodynia behaviors in dose-dependent manner (R2 = 0.8508) (Figure 1C). Within this range, the-L was almost ineffective, the-M was equivalent to PGB, and the-H achieved complete relief. The inhibitions of the central sensitization, shown by the rightwards shifts of curves showing the responses of the C-fiber to the electrical stimulations, were achieved by DHA-H and PGB, as compared with the SNL group (Figure 1C). The antidepressant effects, shown by the decreases of the immobility time in the forced swimming and tail suspension tests, were achieved by DHAM/H and DLT (Figure 1D). The anxiolytic effects, quantified by the open field test, were achieved byDHA-M/H, but not DLT nor PGB (Sup. 1A). TNFα has been reckoned as one of the prominent drug targets when dealing with NP.4 After 14-day oral given, DHA-H was proved to downregulate the expression of


L E T T E R T O E D I T O R
The analgesic and antidepressant properties of dihydroartemisinine in the neuropathic pain mice: By the downregulation of HnRNPA1 in the spinal cord and hippocampus Dear Editor, Neuropathic pain (NP) is far from effectively treated. The failures are more associated with the emotional, rather than the sensory aspects. 1 Therefore, the painemotion co-curation is of primary importance. 2 Our team revealed the analgesic and antidepressant properties of dihydroartemisinine (DHA) in the spinal cord ligation (SNL) mice; 3 clarified that the synergistic regulations of TNFα in the spinal cord (SP) and hippocampus (CA3) may explain for the inhibitions of the C-fiber long-term potentiation (LTP) in the SP and the repairs of CA3 pyramidal neurons; identified heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (HnRNPA1) as the binding target of DHA, by which DHA regulate the expression of TNFα ( Figure 1A).
The analgesic and antidepressant effects were evaluated in the first-line drug pregabalin (PGB,45 mg/kg), duloxetine (DLT, 9 mg/kg) and DHA (H-14.5 mg/kg, M-7.25 mg/kg, L-3.625 mg/kg) groups. Shown by Von Frey tests, the 14-day oral application of DHA attenuated the allodynia behaviors in dose-dependent manner (R 2 = 0.8508) ( Figure 1C). Within this range, the-L was almost ineffective, the-M was equivalent to PGB, and the-H achieved complete relief. The inhibitions of the central sensitization, shown by the rightwards shifts of curves showing the responses of the C-fiber to the electrical stimulations, were achieved by DHA-H and PGB, as compared with the SNL group ( Figure 1C). The antidepressant effects, shown by the decreases of the immobility time in the forced swimming and tail suspension tests, were achieved by DHA-M/H and DLT ( Figure 1D). The anxiolytic effects, quantified by the open field test, were achieved by DHA-M/H, but not DLT nor PGB (Sup. 1A).
TNFα has been reckoned as one of the prominent drug targets when dealing with NP. 4 After 14-day oral given, DHA-H was proved to downregulate the expression of  Figure 1F). Similarly, in mice injected with TNFα in the SP, 10-day oral given of DHA was proved to downregulate TNFα (R 2 = 0.4825) (Sup. 1E) and C-fiber transmitter cGRP (R 2 = 0.6343), attenuate the allodynia behaviours (R 2 = 0.4847) in dose-dependent manners ( Figure 1G). TNFα injection in the SP did not induce depression (Sup. 1D).
Probe-based chemical proteomics experiments were designed to identify molecules underling DHA-mediated downregulation of TNFα. In BV2 cells, 2μM DHA was proved sufficient to downregulate the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced overexpression of TNFα on both mRNA and protein levels ( Figure 2A). The AP1 probe, which harbors the core structure and activity of ART, 5 was used to label and identify the drug binding proteins ( Figure 2B). AP1-fluorescent dye was used to clarify the activity and specificity of probe ( Figure 2C); AP1-Biotin was used to label and purify the probe-binding proteins as previously described. 6 Among the 333 binding proteins, HnRNPA1 were identified as the top hub by the protein-protein interaction analysis (Sup. 2). The binding between DHA and HnRNPA1 was confirmed by the pull-down and the surface plasmon resonance test (SPR) (Sup. 3). One of the widely acknowledged functions of HnRNPA1 is the degradation of IKBα, which contribute to the maximal activation of the NF-kB dependent transcription of TNFα. 7 In BV2 cells and SNL mice (SP and CA3), the DHA-mediated downregulation of HnRNPA1 was proved and companied by the upregulation of IKBα ( Figure 2E In B-C-F, &&& denotes the significant difference between Sham and SNL/TNFα injection (P < 0.001), ***denotes significant difference between SNL and PGB (P < 0.001), %%%, %% denotes significant difference between SNL and DLT (P < 0.001, P < 0.01), @@@,@@,@ denotes the significant difference between SNL/TNFα injection and DHA-H (P < 0.001, P < 0.01, P < 0.05), $$$,$$,$ denotes the significant difference between SNL/TNFα injection and DHA-M (P < 0.001, P < 0.01, P < 0.05), +++ denotes significant difference between DHA-H and DHA-M (P < 0.001), == denotes significant difference between TNFα injection and DHA-L (P <0.01), -− denotes significant difference between DHA-M and DHA-L (P < 0.001), ∧∧∧ denotes significant difference between DHA-H and DHA-H-24 h (P < 0.001). In D-E-G, ***P < 0.001 . All data are shown by mean ± SEM *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 proved to be accompanied by the decreases of the mature HnRNPA1 mRNA (E1011 included, Figure 2F). Further decreases of the mRNA containing E1011 were achieved by DHA, as compared with LPS. Further, clarified by the Co-immunoprecipitation assay, the enhancement of the IKBα-NF-kB binding and the weakness of the IKBα-HnRNPA1 binding was found by DHA, as compared with LPS ( Figure 2G). The DHA-HnRNPA1 binding may (1) downregulate HnRNPA1 by a negative feedback regulation of E1011 splicing; (2) inhibit the transcription of TNFα by the regulations of both HnRNPA1 transcription and the HnRNPA1-IKBα-NF-kB bindings ( Figure 2I).
The following experiments were designed to clarify the associations between the downregulations of HnRNPA1 in the CA3/SP and the curations of NP (Figures 3A and 4A). In CA3, HnRNPA1 was downregulated by DHA-L/M, adeno-associated virus (AAV) encoding HnRNPA1 shRNA (A1-AAV), and further downregulated by DHA-L/M-A1-AAV ( Figure 3B). In accordance with this, DHA and A1-AAV had synergic effects on the down regulation of TNFα. Similar, AAV encoding HnRNPA1 shRNA (A1-sh) resulted in the downregulation of both HnRNPA1 and TNFα as compared with ones injected with the nonsense shRNA (Non) ( Figure 4B). Further, A1-sh resulted in significant downregulations of cGRP ( Figure 4C), increases of pain threshold ( Figure 4D), and decreases of C-fibre LTP ( Figure 4E) as compared with the Non. Shown by the decreases of the immobility time in the tail suspension and forced swimming test as compared with Non, A1-sh were proved to be antidepressant ( Figure 4D).
In conclusion, findings in this work may contribute to a better understanding of the mechanism underlying DHA mediated co-curation of NP, as well as the roles HnRNPA1 assumed in the pain-emotion comorbidity. Findings point out that the synergic regulations of the neuroinflammation in SP and CA3 may deal with NP on not only the sensory but also the emotional aspects.