A qualitative study of perceived social barriers to care for eating disorders: Perspectives from ethnically diverse health care consumers

Objective: The study aim was to identify and describe health consumer perspectives on social barriers to care for eating disorders in an ethnically diverse sample. Method: We conducted an exploratory secondary analysis of qualitative data comprising transcripts from semi-structured interviews with past and prospective consumers of eating disorder treatment (n = 32). Transcripts were inputted into NVivo 8 for coding, sorting, and quantifying thematic content of interest within strata defined by ethnic minority and non-minority participants. We then examined the influence of key social barriers—including stigma and social stereotypes—on perceived impact on care. Results: The majority of respondents (78%) endorsed at least one social barrier to care for an eating or weight concern. Perceived stigma (or shame) and social stereotyping—identified both within social networks and among clinicians—had adversely impacted care for 59% and 19% of respondents, respectively. Discussion: Social barriers to care for eating and weight related concerns may be prevalent in the U.S. and impact both ethnic minority and non-minority health care consumers. © 2009 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2010;)


Introduction
Despite evidence that a large percentage of individuals with an eating disorder do not access specialty care, 1 little is known about specific barriers to accessing care for eating disorders. Numerous reports indicate that eating disorders are frequently unrecognized in clinical settings, [2][3][4][5][6] and other studies suggest that appropriate care is not initiated even when eating disorder symptoms do come to clinical attention. 7,8 Although diverse societal, health-system-based, and individual factors generally influence mental health service utilization, 9,10 utilization patterns for an eating disorder may be distinguished by additional barriers to care. 11 For example, psychological factors relating to motivation, denial, and limited insight have been identified as having an adverse impact on help-seeking and therapeutic engagement, [12][13][14][15] and may also undermine clinical detection. 11,16 The ego-syntonic nature of core eating disorder symptoms, such as severe weight loss or purging (at least in the early stages of the illness), may interfere with an individual's willingness to seek treatment. Both the specific eating disorder diagnosis as well as impairment have been found to be associated with mental health service utilization among individuals with eating disorders. 11 However, social factors-for example, cultural practices, social norms, or socially-based inequities in health resource distribution-impeding access to care for eating disorders have comparatively less visibility in the eating disorders literature. These social factors appear salient to understanding reported ethnic disparities in receipt of eating disorders care.

Ethnic Disparities in Utilization of Eating Disorders Care
Ethnic disparities have been well documented for general health care access, treatment delivery, and outcomes in the United States. 17,18 These inequities are especially germane for mental health, for which racial minorities are at risk for non-detection in primary care practices. 19 Several studies also support that ethnicity may be a risk correlate of reduced access to care for an eating disorder in the U.S. 20,21 Concerns about ethnic disparities in service access for an eating disorder have been raised for ethnic minority patients in the UK [22][23][24] and for immigrants to Australia as well. 11 In one community-based sample of ethnically diverse women with eating disorders, a majority did not receive care for their eating disorder; African-American women, in particular, were significantly less likely to receive care for an eating disorder when compared with white women. 25 Likewise, two other studies have shown ethnicity-based disparities in the treatment of binge eating disorder (BED), with black women significantly less likely than white women to have received treatment. 26,27 Clinician expectations about ethnicity and differential risk that demonstrably contribute to disparities in care and accurate diagnosis for other mental disorders may also be relevant to eating disorders. 28 Clinician-based factors that differentially impact therapeutic decisions for ethnic minority patients may relate to clinician unfamiliarity with ethnic diversity in help-seeking and manifestation of an eating disorder. [29][30][31] For example, a study of participants in a U.S.-based national educational and screening program for eating disorders reported that comparably symptomatic Latino and Native American participants were significantly less likely than white participants to receive a referral for care, and that symptomatic ethnic minority participants were less likely than whites to have been queried by a doctor about eating and weight related issues. 32 Diverse social norms also influence whether patients disclose or seek professional intervention for mental health symptoms. 9,33,34 For example, culture-specific explanatory models frame expectations for the most appropriate venue to address illness as well as for outcomes. 35,36 Evidence also supports that the perception of clinician sensitivity to cultural background, including concerns about racial discrimination and stereotyping, influences treatment seeking. 37 Additional studies document lay perceptions of eating disorders that suggest that neither their associated clinical risks nor the most effective treatment options are uniformly appreciated among prospective health consumers. 11,[38][39][40] Further evidence suggests that individuals with an eating disorder may seek treatment for weight loss 11 or for other health problems, 4 rather than for their eating disorder. Depending on local norms, the social costs of disclosure and help-seeking may be judged to be substantial if a disorder is socially stigmatizing. Mental illness is commonly stigmatized, 41,42 and associated with status loss, discrimination, 43 and barriers to accessing rehabilitative care. 44 Several reports suggest that eating disorders are associated with stigma among both health professionals and among the general public, [45][46][47][48][49] and whereas some data suggest that stigma hinders help-seeking for bulimia nervosa and binge eating, 50,51 its impact is incompletely understood.
The objective of this study was to identify and describe how social factors-including social stereotyping, stigma, and social norms-may influence access to care for eating disorders by examining qualitative data from ethnically diverse past and prospective health care consumers.

Design
We conducted an exploratory, secondary analysis of a qualitative database comprising cross-sectional interview transcripts collected in 1998 and 1999 (n 5 32). These qualitative data had originally been collected from a subsample of respondents who had previously participated in a quantitative study (n 5 289) that found ethnic disparities in clinician queries and referrals for eating and weight related concerns. 32 The follow-up, in-depth interviews had been conducted to supplement these quantitative study data by probing health consumer experience with treatment and its potential relation to ethnic disparities in access to care. This study was approved by the Partners Human Research Committee.

Participants
Narrative data utilized for this secondary analysis were initially collected from respondents identified by their previous participation in a follow-up study to the 1996 National Eating Disorders Screening Program (NEDSP). 32,52 Eligibility for the interview study had required that respondents had (1) affirmed current or past ''concerns, symptoms, or problems'' regarding eating or weight; (2) self-reported ethnic identity; (3) provided contact information that was still valid when the subsample was defined; and (4) were at least 18 years of age.
The sampling strategy included purposive sampling of all eligible ethnic minority respondents to maximize ethnic diversity, which reflected the previous study's aim to examine the relation of ethnicity to access to care. For this previous study, ''ethnic minority'' participants were defined by self-report of any ethnic or racial identity other than ''Caucasian'' in a forced choice item on the NEDSP questionnaire. This sub-sample was designated as the ''ethnic minority'' group (n 5 12; response rate 67%). The ''non-minority'' (i.e., Caucasian) comparison group (n 5 20) comprised a purposive sub-sample identified as ''key informants'' (n 5 5; a convenience sample of the first five key informants scheduled) combined with a randomly selected sub-sample from all others meeting eligibility requirements within this ''non-minority'' cohort (n 5 15; response rate 44%).

Procedures
Development of the Qualitative Database. Cross-sectional, qualitative data were originally collected by semi-structured, open-ended, telephone interviews (n 5 32). Item content-designed to probe the relation of ethnicity to barriers to care for an eating disorderhad been adjusted after the five key informant interviews. Interviews-each at least 45 min in durationwere audiotaped and later transcribed. Interview topic content included structured questions about education, employment, ethnic identity, health insurance, and history of treatment seeking for eating and weight concerns. Semi-structured, open-ended questions included items requesting respondents to describe their experiences in both seeking and receiving treatment as well as personal experience with ethnic or racial stereotyping in health care and other encounters. Specific topics addressed decisions to seek care, difficulties encountered, a critical appraisal of clinician empathy and competence, and ethnicity-specific factors that influenced this process.
Data Analysis. The study team examined interview transcripts to identify key themes relevant to treatment access and therapeutic engagement. We also extracted self-reported data on demographic and health characteristics relevant to study questions (e.g., ethnic identity, gender, history of an eating disorder, treatment history, and health insurance at the time of interview) and confirmed assignment to ''ethnic minority'' and ''non-minority'' sub-groups. Interview transcripts were inputted into NVivo 8 53 for initial coding, sorting, and quantifying thematic content of interest within the two strata defined as ''ethnic minority'' and ''non-minority.'' Two study team members independently identified and coded all occurrences of text relating to stereotyping, social norms that impacted help-seeking, socio-demographic factors impacting communication or empathy in a clinical encounter, and financial constraints and treatment resource availability. Discrepancies in these initial coding assignments were resolved through discussion and/or input by a third investigator and stigma/shame was subsequently coded as another category of interest. Final coding assignments for the key social barriers-social stereotyping, stigma, and constraints associated with availability or affordability of treatment resources-were refined during subsequent evaluation within the context of individual and aggregated interviews. We also identified narrative data and specific excerpts supporting and illustrating respondents' perceived impact of stigma and/ or stereotyping on treatment seeking, access, or engagement. Finally, we used the matrix function of NVivo to examine frequencies of these perceived social barriers in the study sample and within the ethnic minority and non-minority sub-samples.

Results
The study sample was ethnically diverse, including 12 respondents who reported African-American, African-Caribbean, Asian-American (Chinese, Japanese, Korean), Latino, and Native American heritage. Among 20 respondents who self-reported being ''white, non-Latino'' or ''Caucasian,'' 10 reported additional details of their ethnic identity. Almost all respondents were female (n 5 29) and had health insurance at the time of the interview (n 5 30); approximately, one-half were college age. Most participants also self-reported a current or past eating disorder (n 5 23), and a majority reported having received some treatment for an eating disorder or ''any eating or weight related concerns, symptoms, or problems'' (n 5 24). However, one-quarter (n 5 6) of the participants who reported a current or past eating disorder had never received specific treatment for it. Study sample characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Perceived Social Barriers to Care
Respondents identified numerous and diverse perceived barriers to accessing care for an eating disorder. Among these, we discerned impediments to care attributed to or associated with social costs, social norms, and ethnic identity, which we classified broadly as ''culturally-based barriers.'' We also identified societal factors relating to affordability and availability of health services. For the purpose of addressing this study's aims-examining a spectrum of social barriers to care-we distinguished these two categories for analysis, although we recognize their substantial potential to be intertwined. Therefore, for this study, we define ''culturally-based factors'' as those that fundamentally stem from prevailing values, beliefs, practices, and norms within a specific cultural reference group. In this sense, a broad and inclusive use of the term, ''culture,'' is intended to encompass mainstream, ethnicallydefined, and other locally-defined, as well as hybrid, cultural identities. In contrast, for this study we define ''societal factors'' as those more related to the distribution of economic and health care resources. Respondents attributed adverse impact of these social factors in the domains of their treatment seeking, communication in the clinical encounter, and/or therapeutic engagement.

Culturally Based Barriers to Care
Stigma and Shame as Perceived Barriers to Care. Descriptive data on stigma and its identified impact on care are summarized in Table 2. Over half (n 5 19) of the respondents reported personal experience with stigma or shame that appeared to have an adverse impact on care. Specifically, respondents perceived that social costs related to acknowledging an eating disorder had influenced them to avoid or postpone treatment or limit their disclosure of related symptoms. For example, concerns about help-seeking or disclosure included that their symptoms would be viewed as a ''weakness'' or a ''character flaw,'' would shame or disappoint their families, or would result in a lasting and negative label of mental illness (a ''black mark'').
Social Stereotypes as Perceived Barriers to Care. Six respondents perceived that social stereotypes concerning eating disorders or weight had a personal adverse impact on help-seeking, care, or other support (Table 3). Specifically, respondents perceived that concerns or symptoms had been unrecognized, misinterpreted, or dismissed because of expectations about the presentation of an eating disorder or social norms relating to weight. Although both ethnic minority (n 5 2) and nonminority (n 5 4) respondents perceived stereotypes relating to ethnicity and eating disorders as impeding access to appropriate care, their experiences of this impact were qualitatively distinct. For example, non-minority respondents reported the perception that symptoms were dismissed or trivialized but mostly perceived that this was because family members or clinicians viewed eating or weight concerns and symptoms as socially normative rather than as clinically concerning. One non-minority respondent reported that the assumption that she had an eating disorder-because she was young and female, and possibly also because she was white-delayed an appropriate referral for a gastrointestinal illness. Conversely, another non-minority respondent indicated that a social stereotype that eating disorders are ''rampant'' among white girls had actually facilitated help-seeking. She observed that, '' [. . .] in that culture it's more acceptable to have eating disorders so you, maybe I have felt that I didn't have to hide it;'' concluding that, ''I guess it  By contrast, two ethnic minority respondents, both identifying African-American heritage, perceived that their symptoms had been dismissed because a clinician believed that eating disorders did not affect African-Americans. These respondent narratives identified an explicit, central, and adverse impact of racially-based stereotypes on their care. Specifically, they described experiences with clinicians who had dismissed or disregarded symptoms of an eating disorder, apparently because they did not expect them in an African-American patient. For example, one of these participants alluded to disconfirming feedback about her symptoms from her social network in her statement ''[ . . . ] I am not supposed to have the eating condition that I do'' and its influence on her disclosure of information about her eating disorder. She also revealed that her psychologist had not believed that she had an eating disorder because she did not fit the ''stereotype.'' She recounted, ''[ . . . ] once she said that, I basically kind of said, OK and walked away. . .'' In addition to her description of leaving treatment with this therapist, she explained:  Social network Stated that a difficulty she encountered in trying to get help for eating and weight concerns related to her feeling: ''That people don't see it as a concern. That it's a character flaw.
That it's a weakness.'' Stated that ''You know, the general perception [of friends and clinicians] has been that eating disorders are-women who suffer from eating disorders are vain, selfish, petty little creatures who are focused only on their weight and physical appearance, when it's just a symptom of deeper problems.'' Did not seek treatment for eating disorder, which began before college. Eating concerns were not addressed until she received treatment for another mental illness. She never told her family of origin that she had an eating disorder.
a Direct quotations from study participants are marked; other text is investigator interpretation based upon interview content.

SOCIAL BARRIERS TO CARE
International Journal of Eating Disorders 43:7 633-647 2010 She reflected further on her clinical encounter with stereotyping in her statement, ''Yeah, I think [my clinician] put me into the generic mold, which happens to be the white mold, and I don't even know if that same white mold applies to some of the white people I encounter.'' [ID 10] Social Norms and Socio-Demographic Distance as Perceived Barriers to Care. Ethnicity-specific norms for both help-seeking and healthy weight appear to be factors that dissuaded respondents to seek care. For example, a female respondent of Chinese heritage spoke of the message she received against seeking help, especially from a non-Chinese clinician: ''The desire to ask outside the race was kind of like, 'Oh, well you don't want them to know that about you.''' [ID 11] And a white, non-Latino female respondent whose family had lived in the United States for many generations said that weight ''[ . . . ] is just not what polite people talk about.'' [ID 30] In addition, perceived social costs to breaching ethnic identity or evincing a stigmatizing illness potentially moderate effects of social norms for treatment seeking. An African-American respondent explained: ''You know, to already know that you're doing this, less than healthy thing, not only is your health compromised, but your identity is compromised too. That can be a lot.'' [ID 10] One white, non-Latino respondent feared, ''[I]t's going to hurt you for the rest of your life if it ever goes on your record that you've had this problem.'' [ID 14] Respondents also perceived that socio-demographic factors (including age, gender, and social background) had resulted in suboptimal communication, clinician attunement, or therapeutic engagement in clinical encounters. In fact, a majority of participants (53%; 13/20 non-minority, 4/12 minority) perceived actual or hypothetical barriers to therapeutic engagement related to these sociodemographic differences, although some of these were not necessarily specific to care for an eating disorder. These perceptions are illustrated in the following interview excerpts (all from non-minority respondents): ''And then they kind of talk to you in like that condescending kind of tone, like they are just tolerating you, like they're, you're lucky to have their time to sit there and for them to listen to you. You know. And then with women, it's so different.'' [ID 2] ''You don't want to talk about your faults with someone from the other sex.'' [ID 20] ''I guess I sort of felt that, ah, she kind of dismissed some of my, my ah, feeling or whatever was going on as just things that have to do with my age, things like that.'' [ID 26] ''I've always felt very different from the clinicians I've been dealing with and you know, not taken seriously whether it's because of gender or whatever.'' [ ID 28] ''[ . . . ] I have to be honest, I didn't like reveal any information. It was sort of like me trying to give the most brief answers as I could. You know, and not share anything more than I wanted to with him. Because I didn't want to be like you know, 'can I have a woman?' You know, I didn't want to insult him, but I was like, 'I'm not sharing anything like this with you.''' [ID 3] ''I mean you can't describe some of these things to a guy, because he just has no frame of reference.'' [ID 30] ''There was no. . .connection there. And he was a male. I had a real problem confiding because he was a male.'' [ID 5] Societal Barriers: Availability and Affordability of Health Care Finally, additional impediments to accessing care included economic or health insurance constraints as well as suboptimal availability of specialty services. Respondent excerpts reflect that these financial and geographic constraints had also impacted their access to care. Select excerpts illustrate respondents' experience as follows: ''I think access to care can be a big problem. Even if it's not just a factor of, 'I don't have insurance, I don't have money,' finding places at least here where I live that treat eating problems is hard. There are not a lot of places here.'' [ID 10] ''Being able to listen to the patient and just giving the patient enough time, you know, that is, of course you're not going to spend two hours in there, ''And then also my insurance wouldn't cover it any more, so I kinda got kicked out, too.'' [ID 4] ''I mean with our medical insurance though, I had to keep my doctor at home. It was really a hassle, because it was an HMO. It was a hassle to switch around the doctors, and things. So, I still had to go home to go to the doctor. And it was two and a half hours away. So that was difficult. You know, if the doctor had been closer I think it would have been a little easier.'' [ID 6] ''Even though the counselor was incredibly cheap, I was incredibly broke, so I didn't want to go and pay for them, the counseling, and I just had decided to use my friends in that respect.'' [ID 7] ''I really didn't have the means to go like seek a real counselor or [ . . . ] I guess at one point in time I thought about seeing like the Jenny Craig counselor or some type of counselor, but I couldn't afford that.'' [ID 13] ''Insurance is another thing. They always don't like pay for everything that you want them to.'' [ID 15] ''Like I couldn't attend that group cause my health plan wouldn't pay for that.'' [ID 26] Following Andersen and Newman's (1973) typology of determinants of health care utilization, the availability and affordability of health care appear to function as ''enabling components'' that mediated access to health services in our study sample. 9 Fifty-five percent of non-minority participants and 33% of ethnic minority participants endorsed at least one of these societal barriers (Figure 1).

Discussion
Many individuals with an eating disorder do not access appropriate specialty care, yet barriers to treatment access remain inadequately understood. Although previous research has primarily emphasized psychological factors undermining motivation for, and engagement in, care, this qualitative study identified and examined several social factors perceived to undermine receipt of care for eating disorders and related symptoms. In this ethnically diverse study sample of health care consumers, stigma/shame and social stereotyping were identified as impediments to care for eating disorder related symptoms in both ethnic minority and nonminority groups. These social barriers overlap conceptually with one another and are not necessarily mutually exclusive with additional psychologicallybased barriers to care. Moreover, nearly half of study participants also identified cost and availability of health services-frequently invoked factors contributing to patterns of health care utilization 54 -as imposing barriers to specialty care for eating and weight related concerns.
This study augments and complements previous findings by presenting health care consumer perspectives addressing the personal impact of social stereotypes, stigma, and shame on care for eating disorders and related concerns. In comparison with quantitative approaches, these qualitative data also offer a more granular perspective on ways in which social factors discouraged help-seeking or undermined therapeutic engagement for an eating disorder. In addition, these narrative data suggest that stigma, shame, local social and cultural norms, and stereotypes about eating disorders may interact in complex ways that compound their adverse impact on care.
Two respondent narratives that articulated demoralization and frustration related to clinicianheld, racially-based stereotypes that appear to have undermined care warrant special attention. Clinicians are trained to consider social and demographic context in evaluating patients, so it is plausible that clinical stereotyping may partially result from an intention to apply probabilistic data in order to enhance efficiency and identification of high risk individuals. 55 In fact, these findings com- plement two experimentally based studies that demonstrated how ethnicity influenced clinician and lay expectations about the presence of an eating disorder in a fictional patient. 56,57 Although application of socio-demographic risk data may augment clinical data in ways that are potentially helpful to making a prompt diagnosis in some cases, its pre-emption of a complete diagnostic evaluation is problematic. Moreover, data regarding demographic risk correlates of eating disorders are themselves subject to many limitations. Ethnic diversity in help-seeking patterns and in presentation may contribute to bias in prevalence estimates in relation to ethnicity across illnesses. 19,58 Clinical prototypes derived from homogeneous and unrepresentative study populations may be self-perpetuating. 59,60 Although clinicians need to understand the full social context in which an eating disorder presents, inference based solely on ethnicity is unacceptable practice. 61 Taken together, these findings suggest that racial stereotypes may affect the recognition of eating disorder symptoms and highlight the importance of educating clinicians about potential clinical biases that might hinder detection of eating disorders in ethnic minority patients.
Study findings that stigma and/or shame undermined treatment-seeking for eating disorders are also noteworthy and resonate with research reports that have identified stigma attached to eating disorders by both clinicians and laypersons. [45][46][47][48][49] Although stigma broadly relates to care-seeking across other mental disorders, 62 clinicians should be mindful of vulnerability among prospective health care consumers with an eating disorder as well. Shame affecting treatment seeking for an eating disorder may also reflect individual psychological attributes 63 that moderate the impact of prevailing social norms. Although we found that stigma and shame impact both minority and non-minority respondents, narrative study data also suggest ways in which ethnicity may mediate the impact of stigma on care.
Other investigators have suggested the value of enhancing clinician understanding of how low ''mental health literacy'' may undermine treatment-seeking for eating disorders. 38 This study's findings suggest additional opportunities to consider health consumer perspectives to inform efforts to remove barriers to care. For example, our data support that social stereotypes-when they do occur-may diminish opportunities to either seek or receive care and also undermine therapeutic engagement among both ethnic minority and nonminority patients. Although the majority of respondents in this study did not endorse the view that stereotypes had an impact on care, the occurrence of instances within this small study sample warrants further investigation of social barriers to care related to race and ethnicity in larger, more representative study samples. Future inquiry should also examine professional education strategies to support clinician sensitivity to occurrence of eating disorders in diverse populations. The development of training strategies to improve clinician awareness and attunement to eating disorders would potentially benefit patients from all cultural backgrounds Limitations Study findings should be interpreted relative to several important limitations. The sample is small in size and not representative of the U.S. general population. Albeit small, the magnitude of this sample size is typical of qualitative studies, and was also likely adequate to address study objectives. 64 Our sample was also limited by the extant qualitative data base and contained very few male study participants. Moreover, study participant recruitment for development of this data base had yielded a low response rate. In addition, a majority of respondents had health insurance and all had attended an educational and screening program for eating disorders held on U.S. college campuses. As a result, the prevalence and distribution of social barriers identified in this study sample is unlikely to be representative of-and cannot necessarily be generalized to-other populations. Moreover, social norms are fluid and dynamic; thus, stereotypes and stigma perceived at the time the interviews were conducted cannot be presumed to be unchanged. These retrospective data are also subject to recall bias. Therefore, we emphasize that data support perceptions of barriers to care rather than objective impact on care or outcomes. However, we also suggest that data from interviews probing retrospective experience may be especially informative when enriched by greater maturity or insight with age and experience. We also assert that the inclusion of subjective data represents a distinctive strength of this study, because patient voices are underrepresented in the research literature on eating disorders, yet merit attention in order to complement and inform quantitative data based findings.
Next, the eligibility criteria for the study permitted respondents with either eating or weight-related concerns. Consequently, some of the perceived barriers identified in this study may not be specific to eating disorders care, but rather may relate to treatment access for a broader spectrum of eating and weight-related concerns with diverse clinical significance. The resulting diminished specificity is a limitation arguably offset, however, by its inclusion of participants who may not have recognized how their symptoms relate to an eating disorder. In other words, prospective mental health consumers often must decide whether and where to seek treatment without the benefit of a fully informed understanding of the clinical relevance or the most effective therapeutic options for their problem. 11,38-40 Moreover, consumers may prefer initially to seek care for related weight or other medical concerns. 5,6,11 As a result, the clinical diversity of the study sample potentially provides a broad perspective on barriers encountered by patients with an eating disorder.
Finally, our operational definition of ethnic minority was limited. Ethnic identity is a complex construct and our interview probes may not have fully tapped its multidimensional impact on care. In addition, we had an insufficient number of study participants to allow examination of ethnic heterogeneity within either minority or non-minority groups in this study. Ethnic identity and descriptors in the United States cannot be extrapolated to other social contexts. Notwithstanding acknowledged limitations of qualitative data for drawing causal inference, they enlarge the scope of understanding of complex social phenomena and complement statistical data in elucidating the context of behaviors within personal narratives.

Conclusion
This study identifies and characterizes potential social barriers to care for eating disorders and related concerns from a health consumer perspective. Social factors identified in this study sample included stigma and social stereotypes that were perceived to interact with social norms for helpseeking as well as communication and response to symptoms in clinical encounters. These social barriers have impact on both ethnic minority and nonminority health consumers. Societal barriers-that is, constraints related to affordability and/or availability of health care services-were also frequently perceived barriers to care. These study findings augment previous reports relating stigmatization and ethnicity to underutilization of care for eating disorders. It is noteworthy that socio-demographic factors in addition to ethnicity, including age and gender, were perceived to impact care-seeking and experience in the therapeutic encounter. Although similar social factors may have broad impact on inequities of health care access and distribution, study data also suggest potential specific vulnerabilities among consumers with an eating disorder. Social impediments to care may be suitable targets for future interventions to promote optimal and equitable care access for eating disorders. Future research should examine how psychological and social barriers may interact to undermine treatment seeking as well as the prospective impact of enhanced clinician sensitivity to these barriers to care.