Molecular characterization and clonal evolution in Richter transformation: Insights from a case of plasmablastic lymphoma (RT‐PBL) arising from chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and review of the literature

Richter transformation (RT) represents a high-grade transformation observed in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma, leading to increased aggressiveness and unfavourable outcomes. Among the variants of RT, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (RT–DLBCL) is the most commonly encountered, whereas transformation into plasmablastic lymphoma (RT–PBL) is an exceptionally rare event [1, 2]. PBL is characterized by the presence of large atypical B cells displaying plasmablastic or immunoblastic morphology and exhibiting a terminal B-cell differentiation phenotype. Typically, PBL arises de novo in patients with immune deficiency or dysregulation [2, 3]. In this context, we report a compelling case of RT in a patient with unmutated CLL who experienced transformation to PBL 14 months following the initial diagnosis. A 71-year-old man presented with new-onset lymphocytosis (17.

involving abdominal organs.A lymph node biopsy showed effacement by large cells with abundant pale cytoplasm, vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli (Figure 1).Mitoses and apoptosis were abundant.
Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated positive staining for plasmacytic markers CD138 and MUM-1 and a proliferation index close to 100% (Figure 2).HHV8 and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) were negative.
A summary of the immunohistochemical features for both diagnoses is provided in Table S1.
Due to multifactorial medical complications, the patient required ICU admission shortly after.Two cycles of CHOP chemotherapy were administered at reduced dosages but soon switched to palliative treatment.The patient passed away 4 months after RT and 19 months after the initial workup for lymphocytosis.
IGHV mutation status testing was conducted on the bone marrow biopsy with CLL and the lymph node biopsy with PBL.The CLL and PBL populations were found to have identical clonal IGH gene rearrangements (IGHV3-30-301, IGHJ6-02, IGHD3-3*01) that were unmutated (100% homology to IGHV IGMT reference set) [4].FISH testing with a CLL prognostic panel [5] was performed on the bone marrow with CLL which showed the signal pattern for the centromere of chromosome 12 (CEP12)(D12Z1) probe consistent with trisomy 12 in 68% of nuclei.CEP12 FISH analysis on the PBL was also positive.FISH testing with MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 break-apart probes was conducted on PBL only.The MYC and BCL2 break-apart probes were positive, whereas a subsequent FISH with the dual fusion IGH/BCL2 probe was negative indicating a non-IGH partner.c.5920dupA (p.Thr1974fsTer6) was identified at a frequency of 42%.In PBL, the same sequence variants of NOTCH1 and SPEN were present at similar frequencies of 47% and 43%, respectively (Table S2).The analysis revealed the presence of copy number variants, specifically amplifications, in the BRAF, CDK6, EGFR and MET genes within PBL.
rearrangement with MYC rearrangement at transformation, whereas the second case had an MYC rearrangement, which persisted in the subsequent PBL [7].Four of seven cases that underwent MYC rearrangement studies on PBL were positive.BCL2 and BCL6 FISH studies were performed on five cases, revealing gains in BCL2 and BCL6 in two and three cases, respectively.The results of NGS analysis performed on five cases are summarized in Table S5.
Although reviewing the literature revealed that TP53 abnormalities were the most common genetic change in RT-PBL with no NOTCH1 mutation previously reported, this case showed NOTCH1 and SPEN mutations but not TP53.MYC rearrangements are found in both de novo PBL and RT-PBL indicating their significant role in disease progression [14].In this review, five patients developed RT-PBL after ibrutinib, raising the possibility that CLL transforms to RT-PBL as a mechanism of resistance to BCR inhibition or that minor RP-PBL subclones might have been present at treatment initiation potentially selected with a BCR inhibition.A notable distinguishing factor between RT and de novo PBL is the absence of EBV in most cases of RT, whereas de novo PBL is typically EBV-positive [17].
In conclusion, our case adds to the understanding of the genetic and molecular characteristics of PBL as RT.Not many studies have shown a distinct genetic or molecular abnormality that differentiates RT-PBL from RT-DLBCL or de novo PBL [18], although this needs further large cohort analysis [19,20].However, our case demonstrated the concurrence of two mutually exclusive genetic pathways observed in CLL to DLBCL transformations: the TP53 mutation with MYC activation pathway and trisomy 12 with NOTCH1 mutated pathway [21].Further investigations, including NGS analysis of PBL as RT cases, are warranted to identify unique genetic factors contributing to the development of PBL as RT over DLBCL.

Table S4
[2,[7][8][9]o-female ratio was 4:1 and age at primary CLL diagnosis ranged from 52 to 77 years.None of the patients had a known history of immunodeficiency.Three cases had both CLL and months.Of the 14 tested cases, 11 were negative for EBV, and 3 were positive.FISH analysis was conducted on nine cases of CLL[2,[7][8][9], with the most common alterations being 17p13.1 abnormalities (4/9), followed by 13q14.3deletions (3/9).Trisomy 12 was detected in two cases, and 11q22 deletion was found in one.One case exhibited trisomy 12