Effects of variation in resource acquisition during different stages of the life cycle on life‐history traits and trade‐offs in a burying beetle

Abstract Individual variation in resource acquisition should have consequences for life‐history traits and trade‐offs between them because such variation determines how many resources can be allocated to different life‐history functions, such as growth, survival and reproduction. Since resource acquisition can vary across an individual's life cycle, the consequences for life‐history traits and trade‐offs may depend on when during the life cycle resources are limited. We tested for differential and/or interactive effects of variation in resource acquisition in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides. We designed an experiment in which individuals acquired high or low amounts of resources across three stages of the life cycle: larval development, prior to breeding and the onset of breeding in a fully crossed design. Resource acquisition during larval development and prior to breeding affected egg size and offspring survival, respectively. Meanwhile, resource acquisition at the onset of breeding affected size and number of both eggs and offspring. In addition, there were interactive effects between resource acquisition at different stages on egg size and offspring survival. However, only when females acquired few resources at the onset of breeding was there evidence for a trade‐off between offspring size and number. Our results demonstrate that individual variation in resource acquisition during different stages of the life cycle has important consequences for life‐history traits but limited effects on trade‐offs. This suggests that in species that acquire a fixed‐sized resource at the onset of breeding, the size of this resource has larger effects on life‐history trade‐offs than resources acquired at earlier stages.

(e.g. Hayward, Rickard, & Lummaa, 2013;Monaghan, 2008;Nager, Ruegger, & van Noordwijk, 1997;Nagy & Holmes, 2005;Zanette, Clinchy, & Smith, 2006). Furthermore, individual variation in resource acquisition may affect trade-offs between life-history traits such as the trade-offs between the number and size of offspring and between current and future reproduction. The reason for this is that these functions compete for the same pool of limited resources (Flatt & Heyland, 2011;van Noordwijk & de Jong, 1986;Roff, 2002;Smith & Fretwell, 1974), meaning that any increase in allocation towards one function should be associated with a decrease in allocation towards the other (Stearns, 1992). Individual variation in resource acquisition can affect life-history trade-offs by masking the negative correlations that are expected when individuals allocate limited resources between mutually exclusive functions (Lim, Senior, & Nakagawa, 2014;van Noordwijk & de Jong, 1986;Stearns, 1992). Previous work has highlighted the importance of sensitive stages of the life cycle during which there are particularly strong effects of resource limitation (e.g. Hopwood, Moore, & Royle, 2013;Kotrschal, Szidat, & Taborsky, 2014;Lindström, 1999;Metcalfe & Monaghan, 2001;Stearns & Sage, 1980;Wong & Kölliker, 2014). This may reflect that individuals cannot compensate for the effects of resource limitation during certain stages of the life cycle, leading to subsequent long-term consequences for allocation to life-history functions. The effects of variation in resource acquisition at one stage of the life cycle on life-history traits may also interact with the effects of variation in resource acquisition at another stage (e.g. Barrett, Hunt, Moore, & Moore, 2009;Briga, Koetsier, Boonekamp, Jimeno, & Verhulst, 2017;Hopwood, Moore, & Royle, 2014;Taborsky, 2006;Wong & Kölliker, 2014;Zajitschek, Hunt, Jennions, Hall, & Brooks, 2009). Finally, controlling for variation in resource acquisition during sensitive stages can reveal the negative correlations between lifehistory traits in a trade-off as predicted by life-history theory (e.g. Brown, 2003;King, Roff, & Fairbairn, 2011;Smiseth, Andrews, Mattey, & Mooney, 2014). Thus, there is now a need for more studies to examine the potential effects of individual variation in resource acquisition on life-history traits and trade-offs through manipulation of resource acquisition across multiple stages of the life cycle.
We examined the effects of individual variation in resource availability during different stages of the life cycle on life-history traits and trade-offs in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides. This species is a tractable system for examining the effects of variation in resource acquisition because it is straightforward to experimentally control and manipulate resource acquisition during different stages of the life cycle (Smiseth et al., 2014). Nicrophorus vespilloides rear their larvae on the carcasses of small vertebrates that parents prepare by removing fur, rolling into a ball and applying oral and anal secretions that prevent decay (Arce, Johnston, Smiseth, & Rozen, 2012;Scott, 1998). The carcass represents the sole source of food for developing larvae, but is acquired by the parents who search for suitable carcasses, which they secure via interspecific competition (Safryn & Scott, 2000;Scott, 1994).
Thus, the size of the resource acquired determines the amount of resources that a breeding beetle has for investment in its current brood (Smiseth et al., 2014). In addition, the amount of resources acquired during larval development has consequences for adult body size given that adult body size is influenced by larval size at dispersal (Bartlett & Ashworth, 1988;Lock, Smiseth, & Moore, 2004). Furthermore, nonbreeding adults acquire resources from their environment, leading to variation in the nutritional state of individuals prior to breeding. Previous work demonstrates that variation in resource acquisition has important consequences for life-history traits such as growth, survival and reproductive success (e.g. Bartlett & Ashworth, 1988;Gray, Richardson, Ratz, & Smiseth, 2018;Hopwood et al., 2013;Lock et al., 2004;Steiger, Richter, Müller, & Eggert, 2007). In addition, controlling for variation in resource acquisition can reveal trade-offs between life-history traits.
For instance, the trade-off between size and number of offspring is influenced by both carcass size (Smiseth et al., 2014) and female nutritional condition (Steiger et al., 2007). However, it is unclear whether resource limitation during different stages can have differential and/or interactive effects on life-history traits and how important variation in resource acquisition across life stages is for the expression of life-history trade-offs.
In this study, we manipulated the amount of resources acquired by female N. vespilloides across three stages of the life cycle: during larval development, prior to breeding as an adult, and at the onset of breeding. We assigned females to either high or low amounts of resources at each stage in a fully crossed design. We examined the subsequent effects of variation in resource acquisition at these stages on a suite of life-history traits associated with reproduction (clutch size, egg size, hatching success, brood size, brood mass, offspring mass, survival of offspring to eclosion, and offspring lifespan) and investment to self-maintenance/future reproduction (female mass change and female lifespan). We also examined the effects of resource acquisition on the relationship between life-history traits in putative trade-offs. Specifically, we examined the trade-off between the size and number of offspring and between current and future reproduction (i.e. total brood mass and female lifespan, respectively).
Our first prediction was that variation in resource acquisition during different stages of the life cycle would have consequences for different life-history traits. We also predicted that resource limitation during larval development and at the onset of breeding would have the strongest effects on life-history traits and would affect a greater number of traits given that variation at these stages has fixed consequences (Smiseth et al., 2014;Steiger, 2013). Our second prediction was that there would be a positive relationship between traits in a putative trade-off when we excluded information on individual variation in resource acquisition. In contrast, we predicted negative phenotypic correlations between these traits (i.e. evidence for trade-offs) when we included information on individual variation in resource acquisition. This is because variation in resource acquisition is expected to mask variation in allocation strategies (van Noordwijk & de Jong, 1986). Finally, we predicted that the negative phenotypic correlation between traits would be stronger for females assigned to low-resource acquisition treatments than for females assigned to high-resource acquisition treatments given that prior studies show that trade-offs are more pronounced when resources are limited (Smiseth et al., 2014).

| Beetle husbandry
We used 4th-and 5th-generation laboratory-reared beetles from lines originally collected in Edinburgh, UK. Beetles were maintained at 20°C, under a 16:8-hr light:dark cycle. Nonbreeding beetles were housed individually in clear, plastic containers (12 × 8 × 2 cm) filled with 1 cm of moist soil and fed raw, organic beef twice weekly.

| Experimental design
In our study, we manipulated resource acquisition across three stages of the life cycle: during larval development, prior to breeding as adults, and at the onset of breeding (see Figure 1 for a graphical illustration of the experimental design). All experimental treatments had two levels: "low" (L) and "high" (H), reflecting differences in the amount of resources that an individual female acquired in a given stage. All individuals were exposed to one of the

| Resource acquisition during larval development
We manipulated resource acquisition during larval development by varying the amount of time that individual larvae were able to feed from the carcass. Larvae in the "low" resource group were removed from the carcass when they had reached a mass of 100-150 mg, and larvae in the "high" resource group were removed when they reached a mass of 200-250 mg. We did this to limit the amount of resources larvae could acquire during this stage, which has consequences for adult body size in this species (Bartlett & Ashworth, 1988;Lock et al., 2004). Removing larvae from the carcass at different times therefore generates adults that differ in size (Pilakouta, Halford, Rácz, & Smiseth, 2016a;Pilakouta, Richardson, & Smiseth, 2015, 2016bPilakouta & Smiseth, 2016;Steiger, 2013). Once removed from the carcass, larvae were placed in individual containers (12 × 8 × 2 cm) filled with moist soil and left to pupate and eclose as adults. At eclosion, approximately 20 days later, we measured the pronotum width of all adult females to confirm that our treatment had influenced resource acquisition during larval development.
As predicted, there was a substantial difference in the mean (±SD) pronotum width of females from the two groups (F 1, 185 = 1672.7, p < 0.001): 4.04 (±0.24) mm for the "low" resource females and 5.33 (±0.24) mm for "high" resource females. There was no overlap in the range of pronotum widths for "low" (3.50-4.59 mm) and "high" resource females (4.99-6.00 mm). These sizes are similar to those observed in laboratory populations and beetles collected in the field (Steiger, 2013).

| Resource acquisition prior to breeding as an adult
We manipulated resource acquisition prior to breeding as an adult by restricting food availability during that period. In the "low" resource group, females were not fed for 7 days prior to breeding. By contrast, females in the "high" resource group were fed three times in the 7 days prior to breeding. We only exposed females to restriction in food availability after they had reached sexual maturity at 10 days post-eclosion to prevent any potential effects of resource limitation on the timing of sexual maturation. The purpose of these treatments was to generate females that differed in their nutritional condition prior to breeding as measured by their prebreeding mass.
As intended, females in the "low" resource group lost mass in the 7 days prior to breeding, whereas there was no change in the mass of females in the "high" resource group. As a result, there was a significant difference in the mean (±SD) mass of females in the different feeding treatment both within (F 1, 185 = 21.6, p < 0.001) and between size classes (F 3, 183 = 572.2, p < 0.001): 100.22 (±11.89) mg for 'LL-' females; 130.79 (±12.91) mg for "LH-" females; 216.46 (±17.20) mg for "HL-" females; and 260.21 (±19.41) mg for "HH-" females.

| Resource acquisition at the onset of breeding
In order to manipulate resource acquisition during breeding, we provided females with either 'low' (a 3-8-g mouse carcass) or "high" breeding resources (a 23-to 28-g carcass). This simulates a situation in the wild where a female has acquired a carcass for breeding, although we note that our design excludes potential effects due to competition between females over carcasses. We chose these sizes based on previous work showing that N. vespilloides breeds on carcasses ranging in size from 1 to 40 g and that brood size is regulated to match carcass size when breeding on a carcass smaller than 10 g (Müller, Eggert, & Furlkröger, 1990;Smiseth & Moore, 2002). On the day of mating, we first measured the prebreeding mass of each female, which we later used to estimate the female's mass change over the breeding attempt. Mating was initiated by placing each experimental female in a transparent plastic container (11 × 11 × 3 cm) together with an unrelated virgin male for 8 hr (Botterill-James, Ford, While, & Smiseth, 2017;Ford, Henderson, & Smiseth, 2018;Gray et al., 2018). This design was used to ensure that females received sufficient sperm for fertilization and so that they could breed on their own without male assistance. We excluded males during the actual breeding attempt to remove any confounding effects caused by the male's consumption of the carcass or assistance in parental care. After mating, we transferred experimental females to a larger transparent plastic container (17 × 12 × 6 cm) lined with 1 cm of moist soil for breeding. To initiate breeding, we provided females with a freshly thawed mouse carcass of the appropriate size depending on the treatment to which they had been assigned (see above).
From the day of mating and onwards, we checked for eggs twice daily. Immediately before the eggs were expected to hatch (which takes about 59 hr at 20°C; Smiseth, Ward, & Moore, 2006), we scanned the bottom of each container using a CanoScan 9000F Mark II scanner (Canon, Tokyo). We did this to record the number and size of eggs (Ford & Smiseth, 2016). For each scanned image, we counted the number of visible eggs as a measure of clutch size.
Because each container has only a very thin layer of soil, the number of eggs visible at the bottom of the container is strongly correlated with the actual clutch size (Monteith, Andrews, & Smiseth, 2012). We also measured the length and width of up to six randomly selected eggs in pixels using ImageJ (Abràmoff, Magalhães, & Ram, 2004;Monteith et al., 2012). We then converted these measurements to metric length (mm) and calculated a prolate spheroid volume (V) for each egg using the equation V = (1/6) πw 2 l, where w is the width and l is the length of the egg (Berrigan, 1991). We used these measures of clutch size and egg size for each brood to examine the trade-off between the number and size of eggs. We left females to rear their brood undisturbed until the larvae dispersed from the carcass approximately 7 days later.
When all larvae had dispersed from the carcass, we weighed each female again to measure her post-breeding mass. We then calculated the mass change over the breeding attempt for each female by subtracting her prebreeding mass (see above) from her post-breeding mass. Females were then transferred to individual containers (12 × 8 × 2 cm) filled with 1 cm of moist soil and maintained following the protocol for beetles in the stock population (see above). Females were checked twice weekly until death to record their lifespan. At the dispersal stage, we also recorded the number of unhatched eggs visible at the bottom of the box, the number of dispersing larvae and the total mass of the brood. We estimated hatching success by first subtracting the number of unhatched eggs from the clutch size (see above) and then dividing this estimate of the number of hatched eggs by the clutch size. We also calculated average larval mass in each brood by dividing the total brood mass by the number of larvae in the brood. We used our measures of the number of larvae and the average mass of larvae in each brood to examine the trade-off between the number and size of offspring at larval dispersal. Similarly, we used our measures of total brood mass and lifespan for each female to examine the trade-off between current and future reproduction. We then placed the larvae from each brood into transparent plastic containers (17 × 12 × 6 cm) filled with moist soil. Approximately 20 days later, we recorded the number of individuals that successfully eclosed. At this stage, up to six beetles from each brood were placed into individual containers (12 × 8 × 6 cm) and checked twice a week until death to record average lifespan of offspring.

| Statistical analyses
All analyses were performed using R v. as well all corresponding two-way interactions. The three-way interaction between treatments was not significant for any traits and was therefore removed from the analyses. To account for multiple testing, we used false discovery rate corrections (Benjamini & Hochberg, 1995). For bivariate analyses of life-history trade-offs in which information on resource acquisition was excluded, we included both traits in a putative trade-off as dependent variables and the identity of the female as a random effect. For bivariate models that included information on individual variation in resource acquisition, we also included the same factors and interaction effects as those described for the univariate models (see above).

| Effects of resource acquisition on life-history traits
Resource limitation during larval development had a significant effect on egg size as females that acquired fewer resources during larval development laid smaller eggs than females that acquired more resources during larval development (Table 1). However, individual variation in resource acquisition during larval development had no effect on any other traits (Table 1). Variation in resource acquisition prior to breeding as an adult (i.e. female nutritional state) had a significant effect on the amount of mass that females gained during breeding with starved females gaining more mass than nonstarved females (Table 1). In addition, there was a significant effect on the proportion of offspring in the brood surviving to eclosion with starved females having fewer offspring alive at eclosion when breeding on large carcasses (see below; Table 1). There were no effects of resource acquisition during this stage on other traits (Table 1). Resource acquisition at the onset of breeding (i.e. carcass size) had significant effects on the size and number of offspring. Females breeding on large carcasses laid significantly larger clutches and larger eggs than females breeding on small carcasses (Table 1). In addition, females breeding on large carcasses produced broods with more offspring that were heavier in terms of both the total brood mass and the mean mass of the larvae than females breeding on small carcasses (Table 1). There were no effects of resource acquisition at the onset of breeding on other traits (Table 1).
In addition to the main effects of resource acquisition on lifehistory traits, we also found that the effects of resource acquisition at one stage interacted with those at other stages. For instance, there was a significant effect of the interaction between resources acquired during larval development and resources acquired prior to breeding as an adult on egg size (Table 1). This interaction effect indicated that those females that acquired fewer resources during larval development and that were also starved prior to breeding produced larger eggs than those females that acquired fewer resources during larval development but were not starved prior to breeding. In addition, there was a significant effect of the interaction between resources acquired prior to breeding and resources acquired at the onset of breeding on the number of offspring in a brood that survived to eclosion. This effect occurred because starved females breeding on large carcasses had fewer offspring surviving to eclosion than starved females breeding on small carcasses (Table 1).

| Effects of resource acquisition on life-history trade-offs
There was no relationship between the number and size of offspring at the time of larval dispersal when we excluded information on individual variation in resource acquisition (LR χ 2 = 1.61, p = 0.20). However, when we included information on individual variation in resource acquisition, there was a negative relationship between the number of larvae and mean larval mass at the time of dispersal, indicative of a trade-off between the number and size of offspring (Table 2; Figure 2). This trade-off was affected by the amount of resources that females acquired at the onset of breeding (i.e. carcass size), as there was a significant negative relationship between the size and number of offspring at larval dispersal when females bred on a small carcass but not when females bred on a large carcass (Table 2; Figure 2). Thus, females breeding on small carcasses produced smaller offspring as brood size increased, whereas this was not the case for females breeding on large carcasses. The trade-off between the size and number of offspring at larval dispersal was not affected by the amount of TA B L E 1 Effects of variation in resource acquisition during larval development (which influenced adult body size), prior to breeding as an adult (nutritional state), and at the onset of breeding (carcass size) and their two-way interactions on life-history traits in Nicrophorus vespilloides. We provide parameter estimates (±SE), test statistics (LR χ 2 ) and p-values from univariate linear models. We present raw p-values with bold type indicating p-values that remained significant after false discovery rate correction resources a female acquired during larval development or the resources acquired prior to breeding as an adult (Table 2). Similarly, there was no effect of interactions between resources at each stage on the trade-off between the size and number of offspring (Table 2).
There was no evidence for a trade-off between number and size of eggs. There was no relationship between clutch size and egg size when information on resource acquisition was excluded (LR χ 2 = 0.47, p = 0.49). Likewise, there was no relationship between clutch size and egg size when information on individual variation in resource acquisition was included, and this was the case regardless of whether we focused on resource acquisition during larval development, prior to breeding as an adult or at the onset of breeding (Table 2). There was also no effect of the interactions between stages on the relationship between clutch size and egg size (Table 2).
There was no evidence for a relationship between brood mass and female lifespan (i.e. current and future reproduction, respectively), when we excluded information on individual variation in resource acquisition (LR χ 2 = 0.69, p = 0.40). Likewise, including information on resource acquisition during larval development, prior to breeding or during breeding had no effect on the relationship between brood mass and lifespan (Table 2). There was no evidence for interactions between stages on brood mass and female lifespan (Table 2). may lay smaller eggs due to morphological or physiological constraints, such as the amount of available body space for the egg, the size of the ovipositor or the rate of resource transfer from mother TA B L E 2 Effects of variation in resource acquisition during larval development (i.e. adult body size), prior to breeding as an adult (i.e. nutritional state), and at the onset of breeding (i.e. carcass size) and their two-way interactions on life-history trade-offs in Nicrophorus vespilloides. We provide test statistics (LR χ 2 ) and p-values from bivariate linear mixed models examining the trade-off between offspring size and number at larval dispersal, between egg size and number and between brood mass and lifespan (as proxies for current and future reproduction, respectively F I G U R E 2 Effects of variation in resource acquisition on the trade-off between number and size of offspring at larval dispersal. Females acquired either high (H) or low (L) resources during larval development, prior to breeding as an adult, and at the onset of breeding in a fully crossed design to give eight treatments (HHH, HHL, HLH, HLL, LHH, LHL, LLH and LLL). Colours represent the specific treatment that a female experienced. (a) The coloured circles represent the number and mean size of offspring produced by different females. The black dashed line represents the relationship between number and size of offspring when information on individual variation in resource acquisition is excluded (±95% CI). The coloured lines represent this relationship for each treatment when information on resource acquisition is included. Pink colours represent females breeding on large carcasses, and green colours represent females breeding on small carcasses. (b) Correlation coefficients between number and size of offspring at larval dispersal (±95% CI). The black circle represents the correlation coefficient for the whole data set when information on individual variation in resource acquisition is excluded, and the coloured circles represent the correlation coefficient for each treatment. Treatments for which the correlation coefficient differs significantly from zero are indicated with asterisks (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001) to egg (Sakai & Harada, 2001;Steiger, 2013;Yanagi & Tuda, 2012).

| D ISCUSS I ON
Meanwhile, resource acquisition prior to breeding influenced mass gain over the reproductive attempt with starved females gaining more mass than nonstarved females. This result likely reflects that resource acquisition prior to breeding determines female nutritional condition and starved females may feed more from the carcass than nonstarved females to replenish their energy stores (Gray et al., 2018;Keppner, Ayasse, & Steiger, 2018;Trumbo & Xhihani, 2015).
In addition, starved females had fewer offspring alive at eclosion but only when breeding on a large carcass (see below for discussion of this interaction). Finally, resources acquired at the onset of breeding (i.e. carcass size) influenced multiple traits as females breeding on a large carcass produced more eggs, larger eggs, heavier broods, more larvae and heavier larvae than females that acquired a small carcass.
These results are unsurprising given that the carcass acquired by the female is the only source of food for her offspring. In addition, females may adjust how many eggs they lay and how many offspring they rear to the amount of available resources (Bartlett, 1987;Bartlett & Ashworth, 1988;Müller et al., 1990). Taken together, our results demonstrate that variation in individual resource acquisition affects life-history traits, but that limitation during different stages of the life cycle affects different traits and these differential effects make sense in the light of the biology of our study species.
We also found evidence for effects of the interaction between resource acquisition at different stages on life-history traits. There was an interaction between resource acquisition during larval development and resource acquisition prior to breeding on egg size as females that acquired fewer resources during larval development and that were also starved prior to breeding laid larger eggs than females that received fewer resources during larval development but that were not starved prior to breeding. The proximate cause of this effect is unclear, but one potential explanation is that large females were able to lay large eggs regardless of their nutritional state, whereas small females may do so depending on how much they feed from the carcass. Thus, small females that were also starved may have produced larger eggs than small females that were not starved because starved females feed more from the carcass prior to commencing egg laying (Gray et al., 2018). In addition, starved females produced fewer offspring surviving to eclosion, but only when breeding on a large carcass. One potential explanation for this effect is that starved females spend less time suppressing microbial growth on large carcasses, which may elevate offspring mortality after dispersal (Gray et al., 2018). These results highlight that the effects of resource acquisition at a specific stage of the life cycle can be influenced by resource acquisition at other stages.
Our finding that there was a significant negative correlation between the number and size of offspring at dispersal only when females bred on small carcasses confirms that variation in resource acquisition at the start of breeding masks the trade-off between offspring size and number. This finding is in agreement with previous work on this species (Smiseth et al., 2014)  We found no evidence that resource acquisition affected the trade-off between number and size of eggs or between brood mass and lifespan (proxies for current and future reproduction, respectively). There are several potential explanations for why resource acquisition had no effect on these trade-offs. Firstly, resource acquisition may not affect trade-offs between life-history traits if there is no trade-off between them. For instance, the absence of a negative relationship between clutch size and egg size in our experiment suggests that females can invest more in egg size without reducing the number of eggs laid. This result is in keeping with previous studies, which also found no relationship between clutch size and egg size in this species (Monteith et al., 2012;Steiger, 2013). Our result, along with those of previous studies, suggests that the cost of producing eggs is low in Nicrophorus species, potentially because females acquire resources for egg laying by feeding from the carcass (Scott & Traniello, 1987;Trumbo, Borst, & Robinson, 1995 there is a trade-off between investing in current reproduction and immunity with subsequent effects on future reproduction. Finally, resource acquisition may have had no effect on lifehistory trade-offs because of cryptic variation between individuals in some other aspect of their quality. The amount of resources an individual acquires is often treated as synonymous with an individual's quality (Bergeron, Baeta, Pelletier, Reale, & Garant, 2011;Wilson & Nussey, 2010). However, individuals that have acquired the same amount of resources may still differ in other respects, such as their ability to assimilate or utilize acquired resources. For instance, in Daphnia pulicaria, positive correlations between life-history traits persist even when controlling for individual variation in resource acquisition because individuals differ in their ability to utilize resources (Olijnyk & Nelson, 2013). In sum, our results demonstrate that whereas individual variation in resource acquisition at different stages of the life cycle can have differential effects on life-history traits, this is not necessarily associated with effects on trade-offs between life-history traits.
Our study adds to previous work suggesting that necrophagous, coprophagous and parasitoid insects are valuable study systems for investigating the effects of phenotypic variation in resource acquisition on life-history decisions (e.g. Hunt, Simmons, & Kotiaho, 2002;Saeki & Crowley, 2013;Smiseth et al., 2014). This is because these systems allow for direct measurements and manipulations of variation in the amount of resources that parents acquire at the onset of reproduction (i.e. carcass size, dung pat size or host size). Our results suggest that in such systems, variation in the size of the resource has important consequences for lifehistory traits and that it can mask trade-offs between life-history traits. In contrast, variation in resource acquisition prior to breeding has consequences for some life-history traits but not for their associated trade-offs. This appears to be the case regardless of whether such variation has fixed effects, as is the case in larval development, or temporary effects, as in the case of adult nutritional condition. As such, phenotypic variation in the resources acquired for breeding can have important consequences for life-history traits and trade-offs and may be important in determining how individuals cope with environmental instability. Although our results suggest that life-history trade-offs in N. vespilloides are only influenced by resource acquisition at the onset of breeding, we note that prior work shows that the ability of individuals to acquire such resources is determined by both their body size (Otronen, 1988) and their nutritional state (Hopwood et al., 2013

ACK N OWLED G M ENTS
We thank the Edinburgh Countryside Rangers for permission to collect beetles in Edinburgh and Tom Ratz for assistance in maintaining the laboratory population. We are also grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript. This study was funded by a Natural Environment Research Council doctoral training partnership grant (NE/L002558/1).