Arabidopsis ADR1 helper NLR immune receptors localize and function at the plasma membrane in a phospholipid dependent manner

The exact mechanisms underlying PM localization of NLRs lacking predicted transmembrane domains or recognizable lipidation motifs remain elusive. (cid:1) We used confocal microscopy, genetically encoded molecular tools and protein-lipid overlay assays to determine whether PM localization of members of the Arabidopsis HeLo-/ RPW8-like domain ‘helper’ NLR (RNL) family is mediated by the interaction with negatively charged phospholipids of the PM. (cid:1) Our results show that PM localization and stability of some RNLs and one CC-type NLR (CNL) depend on the direct interaction with PM phospholipids. Depletion of phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate from the PM led to a mis-localization of the analysed NLRs and consequently inhibited their cell death activity. We further demonstrate homo-and hetero-association of members of the RNL family. Our results provide new insights into the molecular mechanism of NLR localization and deﬁnes an important role of phospholipids for CNL and RNL PM localization and consequently, for their function. (cid:1) We propose that RNLs interact with anionic PM phospholipids and that RNL-mediated cell death and immune responses happen at the PM.


Introduction
Plant intracellular immune receptors of the nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat receptor (NLR) family mediate recognition of pathogen-derived effector proteins and the induction of a strong immune response.In many cases, NLR activation leads to the hypersensitive response (HR), a type of programmed cell death of the infected cells (Jones & Dangl, 2006;Monteiro & Nishimura, 2018;Balint-Kurti, 2019).Based on their Nterminal domain architecture, three classes of NLRs have been described in plants: Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) NLRs (TNLs), coiled-coil (CC) NLRs (CNLs) and the HeLo/RPW8like coiled-coil (CC R ) domain NLRs (RNLs) (Monteiro & Nishimura, 2018).In Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) the RNL subclass consists of two gene families, ACTIVATED DISEASE RESISTANCE 1 (ADR1) and N REQUIREMENT GENE 1 (NRG1), both being required for immune signalling and cell death induction of many other NLRs, particularly TNLs, and thus are also considered as 'helper' NLRs (Bonardi et al., 2011;Qi et al., 2018;Castel et al., 2019;Lapin et al., 2019;Wu et al., 2019;Saile et al., 2020).CNLs, TNLs and most likely RNLs might induce immune signalling and cell death by oligomerization (Wang et al., 2019a;Hu et al., 2020;Li et al., 2020;Ma et al., 2020;Martin et al., 2020;Bi et al., 2021;Jacob et al., 2021;Wu et al., 2021).CNL activation was speculated to result in the formation of a pore-like or membrane disrupting structure of the CC domains (a so-called resistosome) at the plasma membrane (PM) (Collier et al., 2011;Burdett et al., 2019;Wang et al., 2019a;Xiong et al., 2020;Bi et al., 2021).Recently, it was demonstrated that the pentameric resistosome formed by CNL Arabidopsis HOPZ-ACTIVATED RESISTANCE 1 (AtZAR1) forms a cation-selective and calcium-permeable channel at the PM (Bi et al., 2021).Calcium influx is known to trigger defence activation and cell death upon NLR activation (Yoshioka et al., 2006;Zhao et al., 2021).PM localization is required for cell death and immune function of many CNLs, including Arabidopsis RESISTANCE TO PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE 5 (AtRPS5), RESISTANCE TO PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE PV MACULICOLA 1 (AtRPM1) and AtZAR1 (Gao et al., 2011;Qi et al., 2012;El Kasmi et al., 2017;Wang et al., 2019aWang et al., , 2020a)).By contrast, the subcellular localization of RNLs has not yet been analysed in detail.So far only the localization of AtNRG1s, but not of AtADR1s, was described.AtNRG1s were found to display a partial endoplasmic reticulum (ER) as well as a PM and cytosolic localization (Lapin et al., 2019;Wu et al., 2019;Jacob et al., 2021).Remarkably, the autoactivated mutant AtNRG1.1 DV was observed to display an increased PM localization and additionally localized to puncta on the PM, suggesting that also RNLs function at the PM (Jacob et al., 2021).The expression of activated AtNRG1.1 DV and AtADR1 resulted in an increase of the intracellular calcium concentration and further electrophysiological analysis revealed that RNLs can also act as potential PM-localized calcium-permeable channels (Jacob et al., 2021), similar as shown for the CNL AtZAR1 (Bi et al., 2021).Interestingly, many PMlocalized CNLs and the RNLs have no predicted transmembrane domain/sequence or N-or C-terminal lipidation motifs and the mechanism that tethers them to the PM is unknown (Gao et al., 2011).Thus, the molecular determinants driving their localization and cell death function at the membrane are not identified.
Homology modelling suggested that the CC R domains of RNLs share structural similarities with the N-terminal 4-helix bundle (HeLo domain) of mammalian MIXED-LINEAGE KINASE DOMAIN-LIKE (MLKL) proteins and fungal HET-s/ HELL proteins (Daskalov et al., 2016;Bentham et al., 2018;Jubic et al., 2019).X-ray crystal structures of two mutant NRG1.1 CC R domains recently confirmed that AtNRG1.1 CC R resembles the MLKL 4-helix bundle (Jacob et al., 2021).HeLo domains mediate the cell death function of MLKL and HET-s/ HELL proteins and are proposed to oligomerize and disrupt or permeabilize the PM (Hofmann, 2020;Murphy, 2020).PM localization and hence, cell death function of MLKL proteins requires the interaction of their HeLo domain with specific phospholipids at the PM (Dondelinger et al., 2014;Quarato et al., 2016).
Negatively charged phospholipids are low abundant lipids that mediate electrostatic interactions between membranes and proteins that contain polybasic or basic hydrophobic domains or clusters (McLaughlin & Murray, 2005;Heo et al., 2006).Anionic phospholipids, including phosphatidylinositol phosphates (PIPs), phosphatidic acid (PA) and phosphatidylserine (PS), are particularly partitioned in membranes by type and thereby, contribute to organelle identity (Noack & Jaillais, 2017).The PM is the most electronegative compartment across eukaryotes (Yeung et al., 2006;Simon et al., 2016).In plants, phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate (PI4P), PA and PS are required for the generation of the high electrostatic field of the PM (Simon et al., 2016;Platre et al., 2018).Especially, PI4P was found to be the main driver of the plant PM electronegativity (Simon et al., 2016).While phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P 2 ) can also be found at the plant PM, it does not contribute to the PM surface charge (Simon et al., 2016).
Expression of the PM-anchored catalytic domain of the yeast phospholipid-phosphatase Sac1p protein, which specifically dephosphorylates PM PI4P and therefore reduces PI4P levels and the PM electronegativity (Simon et al., 2016;Gronnier et al., 2017), can be used to determine whether a protein requires the presence of PI4P (or a high electronegativity) for localization and/or function at the PM.Depleting PI4P from the PM affects the localization and function of several proteins, including the auxin transport regulator PINOID or the BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITITVE 1 (BRI1) kinase inhibitor 1 (BKI1) (Simon et al., 2016).
We show that decreasing PI4P abundance at the PM results in the rapid degradation of the CNL AtRPM1 and the RNL family members AtADR1-L1 and AtADR1-L2.We also show that depleting PI4P from the PM causes a mis-localization of AtADR1 and the AtADR1s CC R domains.Mis-localized AtADR1 and AtADR1s CC R domains were severely impaired in their cell death activity, demonstrating that AtADR1s function at the PM.
Our results provide new insights into the molecular mechanism of NLR PM localization and defines an important role of the PM PI4P pool for the PM localization of AtRPM1 and AtADR1s.Further, our work indicates that AtADR1s deploy a lipid-protein interaction similar to mammalian MLKL proteins for PM localization, which is likely necessary for cell death execution at the PM.Our data also show that AtADR1s are capable of both homo-and hetero-association, suggesting that they form at least dimers or oligomeric complexes (resistosomes) for cell death induction.

Plasmid construction
Plasmid construction was done using standard techniques, including TOPO ® cloning, GATEWAY TM cloning and Golden Gate cloning.Details are provided in Supporting Information Methods S1.

Transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana
Agrobacterium tumefaciens overnight cultures were centrifuged and resuspended in induction buffer (10 mM MgCl 2 , 10 mM MES pH 5.6, 150 µM acetosyringone).The optical density at 600 nm (OD 600 ) of all constructs was adjusted to 0.3 except of 35S::P19 which was adjusted to 0.05.Samples were mixed as indicated.Agrobacteria mixtures were infiltrated into leaves of 4 to 6-wk-old N. benthamiana wild-type (WT) plants.SAC1 dead and SAC1 WT as well as dOCRL dead (Drosophila melanogaster orthologue of human oculocerebrorenal syndrome of Lowe 1) and dOCRL WT coinfiltrations were always done on the same leaf to avoid expression differences that might arise from leaf-to-leaf variation.Nicotiana benthamiana plants were grown on soil under 12 h : 12 h, light : dark cycles (24°C : 22°C, 70% humidity).Induction of protein expression was done 24 h post-infiltration by spraying using either 30 µM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and 0.001% (v/v) Silwet L-77 or 20 µM estradiol (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.001% (v/v) Silwet L-77.

Cell death assay
Indicated constructs were transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves and leaves were imaged for cell death as described in Methods S1.

Confocal imaging
Protein localization was analysed at the indicated time points with an inverse confocal laser scanning microscope LSM880 from Zeiss (Oberkochen, Germany) and an upright confocal laser scanning microscope TCS SP8 from Leica (Wetzlar, Germany) as described in Methods S1.

Western blot analysis of transiently expressed proteins
Frozen N. benthamiana leaf tissue was homogenized using a tissue homogenizer (Mill Retsch MM400; Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany) and resuspended in grinding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 0.1% (w/v) SDS, 5 mM DTT, 19 Halt TM PIC (Thermo Fisher Scientific)).Samples were incubated on ice for 10 min and then centrifuged for 15 min at 16 000 g and 4°C.Then, 59 sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) loading buffer (250 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 50% (v/v) glycerol, 500 mM DTT, 10% (w/v) SDS, 0.005% (w/v) bromophenol blue) was added to the supernatants, respectively.Proteins were denatured by incubation at 95°C for 5 min.SDS-PAGE (polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis), Western blotting and immunodetection followed standard procedures.Details for primary and secondary antibody dilutions are provided in Methods S1.Chemiluminescence was detected using an Amersham IMAGEQUANT 800 (GE Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, UK).Images were processed with Adobe PHOTOSHOP CS2 (Adobe Inc., San Jos e, CA, USA) for adjustment of brightness and contrast.Protein band intensities were determined by Western blot quantification using IMAGEJ as described by Hossein Davarinejad (http://www.yorku.ca/yisheng/Internal/Protocols/ImageJ.pdf).The quantification reflects the relative protein amounts as a ratio of the intensity of each protein band relative to the intensity of the lane's loading control (Rubisco band of the Ponceau stained membranes).Relative protein amounts were normalized to corresponding values from relative protein amounts of SAC1 dead or dOCRL dead coinfiltrations, respectively.

Microsomal fractionation
Microsomal membrane fractions were prepared from transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing either pADR1-L2::ADR1-L2-HA or pADR1-L2::ADR1-L2 DV -HA (Roberts et al., 2013).Plant tissue was ground in liquid nitrogen and sucrose buffer (20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 0.33 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT and 19 Halt TM PIC (Thermo Fisher Scientific)) was added in a ratio of 3 : 1.Samples were centrifuged at 2000 g for 10 min at 4°C to remove debris.Supernatants were transferred to fresh tubes and centrifuged again at 2000 g for 10 min at 4°C followed by an ultra-centrifugation step at 100 000 g for 45 min at 4°C.The microsomal pellet was resuspended in 50 µl sucrose buffer.20 µg or 40 µg protein of each protein fraction (total, soluble, microsomes) was used for SDS-PAGE, respectively.
In vitro transcription and translation and PIP strip assay ADR1 CC R -HA (1-146 aa), ADR1-L1 CC R -HA (1-155 aa), ADR1-L2 CC R -HA (1-153 aa), RPM1 CC-HA (1-156 aa) and Citrine-HA were expressed in vitro using the TnT ® SP6 High-Yield Wheat Germ Protein Expression System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.A PCR-generated DNA fragment was used as template for the transcription and translation reaction.Primers are listed in Table S1.Protein synthesis was confirmed on Western blot using an haemagglutinin (HA)-specific antibody.Lipid overlay assays using PIP strips were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Echelon Biosciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) and as described in Reuter et al. (2021).

Transmembrane, lipidation and membrane binding sites predictions
Predictions for transmembrane domains, lipidation motifs and membrane binding sites were done using different online tools as described in Methods S1.

Results
AtADR1s localize to the plasma membrane in N. benthamiana The subcellular localization of two Arabidopsis full length RNLs, AtNRG1.1 and AtNRG1.2, was recently described.Both proteins localize to ER membranes, partially to the PM and in the cytosol when transiently expressed in N. benthamiana and analysed by confocal microscopy or subcellular fractionation experiments (Lapin et al., 2019;Wu et al., 2019;Jacob et al., 2021).Their intracellular localization was not changed upon effectortriggered and TNL-mediated activation (Qi et al., 2018;Wu et al., 2019).However, the autoactivated mutant of AtNRG1.1 displayed increased PM localization and additionally, localized in puncta on or close to the PM (Jacob et al., 2021).Information on the localization of the other RNL subfamily, the AtADR1s, is missing.To investigate the subcellular localization of the three AtADR1 proteins pre-and post-activation, we transiently expressed C-terminally EYFP-or Citrine-HA-tagged WT AtADR1, AtADR1-L1 and AtADR1-L2 in N. benthamiana leaves under the control of an estradiol inducible or 35s promotor (Figs 1a,d,g, S1a,c,e,g) and their native promotors (Fig. S2ac).We observed no difference in the localization pattern of the AtADR1 proteins, regardless of the promotor used (Figs 1a,d,g, S1a,c,e,g, S2a-c).All three AtADR1 WT proteins co-localized with the PM-localized receptor-like kinase BRI1-mRFP (Figs 1a, d,g, S1a,e,g, S2a-c) (Friedrichsen et al., 2000).In contrast to AtADR1-L1 and AtADR1-L2 the localization of AtADR1 was not restricted to the PM.AtADR1 additionally localized to (1) the ER membrane, since we observed a co-localization with the ER-resident plant V-ATPase assembly factor AtVMA12-RFP (Fig. S1c) (Viotti et al., 2013) and to (2) puncta, some of which might be PM and/or ER associated (Fig. S1a,c).
In order to confirm the membrane association of AtADR1s in Arabidopsis, we performed subcellular fractionation experiments of protein extracts prepared from Arabidopsis seedlings stably expressing AtADR1-L2-HA under control of its native promoter.AtADR1-L2-HA was clearly enriched in the microsomal membrane fraction compared to the soluble fraction, demonstrating that also in Arabidopsis, AtADR1-L2 is mainly associated with membranes (Fig. S2d).These results suggest that AtADR1 proteins might display a similar localization pattern in Arabidopsis as observed in N. benthamiana and hence, might also primarily be PM localized.
Since NLR localization might change once the receptor is activated (Wang et al., 2019a;Jacob et al., 2021), we generated autoactive versions of AtADR1s by mutating a conserved aspartic acid in the MHD motif to valine, referred to as DV (QHD to QHV in AtRNLs; cell death phenotype of autoactivated AtRNLs shown in Figs 2a, S3) (Van Ooijen et al., 2008;Williams et al., 2011;Roberts et al., 2013).We also generated AtADR1 P-loop mutants (GKT to AAA), referred to as AAA, to determine whether loss of P-loop function, which was shown to affect the canonical function of at least AtADR1-L2 (Roberts et al., 2013), has an effect on AtADR1s localization.Confocal microscopy analyses revealed that all three AtADR1 P-loop mutant proteins still localized to the PM, but also in the cytosol and/or to the ER (Fig. 1b,e,h), similar as observed previously for AtNRG1.1 loss of cell death function mutants (Jacob et al., 2021).By contrast, autoactivated AtADR1 proteins strongly resembled the localization of AtADR1 WT proteins and thus, were found to be localized to the PM (AtADR1 DV , AtADR1-L1 DV , AtADR1-L2 DV ) and ER (ADR1 DV ) (Figs 1c,f,i,S1b,d,f,h).We also noticed that AtADR1 DV and AtADR1-L1 DV localized to BRI1-mRFP positive puncta (Figs 1c,f, S1b,f), most likely endosomes and/or PM nanodomains.This however was not observed for AtADR1-L2 DV (Figs 1i,S1h).
We performed subcellular fractionation experiments using protein extracts prepared from transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing the auto-activated mutant AtADR1-L2 DV -HA under control of its endogenous promoter to validate the membrane association of activated AtADR1s in Arabidopsis.AtADR1-L2 DV -HA was enriched in the microsomal membrane fraction compared to the soluble fraction, confirming that also in Arabidopsis, AtADR1-L2 DV primarily is associated with membranes (Fig. S2e).
These results demonstrate that the three members of the AtADR1 subfamily localize to the plant PM pre-and postactivation and further suggest that AtADR1 WT (steady-state) additionally localizes to ER membranes and ER-associated dotlike structures, as observed for AtNRG1.1 (Lapin et al., 2019;Wu et al., 2019;Jacob et al., 2021).Given the high similarity (70-75%) of the protein sequence between the AtADR1 family members, the additional ER localization of AtADR1 was unexpected.We speculate that differences in interaction partners of the three AtADR1s are likely causal for this localization.However, the PM localization of all (auto-)activated AtADR1s suggests that they also execute their immune (cell death) function at the PM.

Homo-and hetero-association of AtADR1s
NLR function in plants and animals is proposed to require oligomerization for proper induction of cell death and immunity (Wang & Chai, 2020).Recently, it has been shown that autoactive AtNRG1.1 DV forms high molecular weight complexes, whereas inactive mutant AtNRG1.1 variants did not (Jacob et al., 2021).If the formation of the high molecular weight complexes of AtNRG1.1 DV involves homo-oligomerization is not known, but very likely, given that N. benthamiana NRG1 self-associates (Qi et al., 2018).Likewise, AtADR1-L1 was found to selfassociate and this self-association was enhanced upon immune activation (Wu et al., 2021).On that basis, we tested, whether all three AtADR1 proteins are capable of forming homo-and also hetero-dimers and whether these associations are dependent on their activation status.First, we analysed the capability of AtADR1 WT and the autoactivated QHV mutant (DV) proteins to induce a cell death response after transient over-expression in N. benthamiana.We observed that over-expression of AtADR1, AtADR1 DV and AtADR1-L1 DV induced a HR-like cell death, whereas the over-expression of ADR1-L2 DV only resulted in a

Research
New Phytologist very weak cell death response that was not reliably reproducible (only 13 of 26 leaves showed mild or weak HR-like symptoms; Figs 2a,b, S3).We also found that the AtADR1-induced HR-like cell death occurred earlier in comparison to the cell death response triggered by both AtADR1-L1 DV and AtADR1-L2 DV .AtADR1-L1 and AtADR1-L2 WT proteins did not induce a cell death response.The same applies to the catalytic P-loop mutant (AAA) AtADR1-L1 AAA , whereas AtADR1-L2 AAA did sometimes, but not strongly and reliably induce a cell death response under our conditions (Figs 2a,b,S3).By contrast, AtADR1 AAA consistently induced a strong cell death response in all our experiments, suggesting that P-loop function is not required for at least AtADR1 cell death activity.These observations suggest that some RNLs may not require a functional P-loop for their immune activity.
Our data indicate that WT AtADR1 is already highly active under steady-state conditions, whereas AtADR1-L1 and AtADR1-L2 are kept inactive.However, exchange of D for V in the QHD motif renders AtADR1-L1 DV and AtADR1-L2 DV into active proteins.
We next analysed whether AtADR1s WT and mutant variants are capable of forming homo-and hetero-oligomers by co-immunoprecipitation experiments.Therefore, differently tagged AtADR1s WT and mutant proteins were transiently co-expressed in N. benthamiana.Our co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that all AtADR1 WT and mutant proteins self-associated (Fig. 2c).While AtADR1 WT proteins strongly self-associated, the capability of AtADR1-L1 and AtADR1-L2 WT proteins to homo-dimerize seems to be reduced.Exchange of D for V in AtADR1 and AtADR1-L1 clearly increased the amount of the co-immunoprecipitated AtADR1 and AtADR1-L1, respectively (Fig. 2c).Interestingly, the P-loop mutations (AAA) did not abolish self-association capability.We even observed enhanced self-association, in particular of AtADR1-L1 AAA and AtADR1-L2 AAA compared to their WT proteins (Fig. 2c).Likewise, we found that AtADR1 proteins are also capable of forming hetero-dimers and that the hetero-association is positively affected by mutations in both the P-loop regions and QHD motifs of all three AtADR1s, respectively (Fig. 2d).Taken together, AtADR1 proteins associate into homomeric and heteromeric complexes, suggesting that they might exist as dimers/oligomers when inducing cell death.However, homoand hetero-associations seemed to be stabilized by mutations in both the P-loop region and the QHD motif.Mutations in both regions might interfere with intramolecular interactions, resulting in a conformational change that might favour, promote or stabilize RNL-RNL interactions.

AtADR1s and CNL RPM1 localization and protein stability require PM PI4P
The PM localization of AtADR1, AtADR1-L1 and AtADR1-L2 suggests that they execute their immune function at this cellular compartment as observed for other NLRs, such as AtRPM1 or AtZAR1 and the RNL AtNRG1.1 (Gao et al., 2011;Bi et al., 2021;Jacob et al., 2021).Interestingly, for both RNL families and many PM-localized CNLs, including AtRPM1, no transmembrane region could be identified and thus, they are most likely peripheral membrane proteins (Table S2) (Boyes et al., 1998).Given the structural homology of RNL CC R domains with the phosphatidyl-inositol phosphate binding HeLo domain of mammalian MLKL (Dondelinger et al., 2014;Jacob et al., 2021), we investigated whether the presence of specific phosphoinositide species might be important for the PM localization of AtADR1s and the CNL AtRPM1.Since PI4P is one of the major phospholipids of the plant PM (Simon et al., 2016), we tested whether AtADR1s and AtRPM1 PM localization require PI4P.Transient expression of the catalytic domain of the PMlocalized PI4P-specific yeast phosphatase SAC1p can be used to specifically decrease the PI4P pool at the PM and therefore, to determine the requirement of PI4P for the PM localization and function of proteins of interest (Simon et al., 2016;Gronnier et al., 2017;Doumane & Caillaud, 2020).We co-expressed the three AtADR1s and AtRPM1 with SAC1 and determined their subcellular localization and protein abundance by confocal microscopy and Western blot analysis, respectively.The Nterminally myristoylated and PM localized Arabidopsis CNL AtRPS5 was included as a control NLR as AtRPS5 PM localization (and function) was not expected to be affected by PM PI4P reduction (Qi et al., 2012;Pottinger & Innes, 2020).Coexpression with the WT SAC1 (SAC WT ), but not with the catalytically inactive SAC1 (SAC1 dead ), affected the PM localization of all tested NLRs except AtRPS5 (Figs 3a,c,e,g, S4a).Thus, the effect of SAC1 activity on the PM localization of AtADR1s and AtRPM1 is specific and not of general nature.Co-localization of AtADR1 with SAC1 WT at the PM was rarely detectable and the majority of AtADR1 was localized inside the cell, likely at the ER and/or cytosol (Fig. 3a).However, no fluorescence was observed for either AtADR1-L1 or AtRPM1, and only a very weak fluorescence was detectable in the cell for AtADR1-L2, after co-expression with SAC1 WT (Fig. 3c,e,g).Western blot analysis of AtADR1-L1, AtADR1-L2 and AtRPM1 confirmed a remarkable or even a complete loss of NLR protein accumulation upon co-expression with SAC1 WT (Fig. 3d,f,h).By contrast, AtADR1 displayed a slightly reduced accumulation in Western blot analysis when co-expressed with SAC1 WT (Fig. 3b).These findings indicate that depleting the PM PI4P pool severely affects the localization and consequently, protein accumulation of AtADR1-L1, AtADR1-L2 and AtRPM1.A similar observation was previously reported for a PS specific binding protein, which is unstable in the Arabidopsis pss1 mutant that is impaired in PS production (Platre et al., 2018).By contrast, though depletion of PI4P from the PM severely affected the subcellular localization of AtADR1, AtADR1 protein abundance was only marginally reduced.82% of AtADR1 was still detectable by protein blot analysis upon co-expression with SAC1 WT .
In order to test whether the reduced or complete loss of NLR protein accumulation upon SAC1 WT co-expression was due to degradation of the mis-localized proteins, we analysed protein levels by Western blot in presence of both protease and proteasome inhibitors.The specific inhibition of proteasomal degradation by BTZ had an observable effect on the accumulation of AtADR1 and AtADR1-L2 (Fig. S5a,c) and a weak effect on AtADR1-L1 (Fig. S5b).This indicates that proteasomal degradation is, at least partially, responsible for the degradation of mislocalized AtADR1s.By contrast, mis-localized AtRPM1 could not be stabilized in the presence of BTZ (Fig. S5d), suggesting that the proteasome plays no major role in AtRPM1 degradation.This is consistent with previously published data (Gao et al., 2011).
Together these results clearly demonstrate that all three AtADR1s and AtRPM1 require PI4P or a high death function (Gao et al., 2011;Qi et al., 2012;El Kasmi et al., 2017;Wang et al., 2019aWang et al., , 2020a)).The severe effect of PI4P depletion from the PM on the localization and stability of the AtADR1s and AtRPM1, prompted us to analyse whether their cell death function was also affected.
To examine this, we co-expressed SAC1 WT or SAC1 dead with the cell death-inducing AtADR1 WT and AtADR1 DV mutant (Fig. 4a,b).Co-expression with SAC1 WT , but not with SAC1 dead , suppressed the cell death response of both AtADR1 WT (Fig. 4a) and AtADR1 DV (Fig. 4b).We conclude that PI4P depletion severely affects AtADR1 cell death activity, most likely due to loss or severe reduction of PM localization, as ADR1 protein abundance was not massively affected (Figs 3a,b, 4a).
AtRPM1 guards the immune regulatory protein RIN4 (RPM1 INTERACTING PROTEIN 4) and is activated by an effectortriggered phosphorylation of RIN4 threonine 166 (Chung et al., 2011;Liu et al., 2011).AtRPM1 activation can be reconstituted in N. benthamiana by co-expression of AtRPM1 and a phosphomimic mutant of AtRIN4 (AtRIN4 T166D ) (Gao et al., 2011;Chung et al., 2014).The strong cell death response upon AtRPM1 activation by AtRIN4 T166D was completely inhibited by SAC1 WT co-expression, but not by SAC1 dead (Fig. 4c).Cell death activity of effector-activated AtRPM1 was also severely affected by SAC1 WT co-expression (Fig. S6b), suggesting that AtRPM1-mediated cell death activity requires PM localization and consequently, depends on the PM PI4P pool.
To demonstrate that the effect of decreasing the PM PI4P pool on the cell death activity of AtADR1s and AtRPM1 is specific and not of general nature, we analysed whether SAC1 WT activity affects cell death mediated by the myristoylated and 'constitutively' PM localized AtRPS5.Similar to the AtRPM1-mediated cell death response, the AtRPS5-mediated and effector-triggered cell death can be reconstituted in transient expression assays in N. benthamiana (Ade et al., 2007).Neither the expression of SAC1 WT nor SAC1 dead suppressed effector-triggered and AtRPS5-mediated cell death (Fig. S4e).These results suggest that the effect of SAC1 activity on cell death induction by the AtADR1s and AtRPM1 is specific.
Transient over-expression of the CC R domains of the AtRNLs AtADR1, AtADR1-L2 and AtNRG1.1 is sufficient to induce a cell death response in N. benthamiana (Fig. 4d-f) (Collier et al., 2011).CC R domain induced cell death activity was dramatically diminished by SAC1 WT , but not SAC1 dead co-expression (Fig. 4d-f), similar as observed for full-length AtADR1.These results suggest that the RNL CC R domains also induce cell death at the PM and that their activity is affected by PM PI4P depletion.Expression of the AtADR1-L1 CC R domain did not induce a visible cell death response in transient expression assays under our conditions and hence, could not be tested for PI4P dependency (Fig. S6a).Interestingly, in contrast to the measurable negative effect of SAC1 WT activity on the accumulation of the fulllength NLR proteins (Fig. 3d,f,h) we did not observe a similar effect on the CC R domains (Fig. 4d-f).Altogether, PI4P depletion does not affect CC R domain stability, but substantially affects CC R domain-induced cell death.
Taken together, our results demonstrate that AtRNL and AtRPM1 cell death activity is significantly affected by PI4P depletion from the PM and further suggest that cell death activity of all AtRNLs, including the partially ER-localized AtNRG1s (Lapin et al., 2019;Wu et al., 2019;Jacob et al., 2021), takes place at the PM.
PI4P depletion affects PM localization of AtADR1, AtADR1-L1 and AtADR1-L2 CC R domains Cell death activity of the AtADR1 and AtADR1-L2 CC R domains was notably diminished by SAC1 WT co-expression (Fig. 4d,e).However, unlike the full length AtADR1s, the stability of the AtADR1s CC R -domains was not affected (Fig. 4d,e).To test whether PI4P depletion affects AtADR1s CC R localization and hence function, we co-expressed the CC R domains of all three AtADR1s with SAC1 WT or SAC1 dead and analysed their localization by confocal microscopy.The AtADR1s CC R domains showed a similar localization pattern as their 'parental' full-length proteins.All three CC R domains localized to the PM in the presence of SAC1 dead (Figs 5, S7).We also observed that the AtADR1 CC R domain localized to dot-like structures and to ER membranes (Figs 5a, S7a).However, the PM localization of all three AtADR1s CC R domains was affected by SAC1 WT coexpression.Fluorescence of the CC R domains was detected at intracellular puncta and also at ER membranes and/or the cytosol (Figs 5, S7).
Taken together, PI4P depletion from the PM leads to a reduced PM localization (and loss of cell death function) of the AtADR1s CC R domains and potentially a (mis-)localization to endosomal compartments and the ER or cytosol.Proteins that are normally interacting with the PM in a PI4P-or electronegativity-dependent manner have been shown to 'adopt' endosomal localization once the PM PI4P pool is depleted (Simon et al., 2016;Platre et al., 2018).
AtADR1, AtADR1-L1, AtADR1-L2 CC R and AtRPM1 CC domains specifically interact with anionic lipids in vitro Reducing the abundance of PM PI4P levels negatively influenced the function, localization and stability of the tested AtADR1s and AtRPM1.Thus, it is very likely that a direct interaction of AtADR1s and AtRPM1 with PM PI4P or other anionic lipids is causal for their PM localization.Given the structural homology of the CC R domains with the N-terminal HeLo domain of MLKL (Jacob et al., 2021) and the importance of the CC domain for cell death function of many CNLs (Bentham et al., 2018) we investigated whether the AtADR1s CC R and the AtRPM1 CC domains bind to specific phospholipids.We generated C-terminally HA-tagged CC domain proteins in vitro and incubated the proteins on a lipid array (PIP strip).As a negative control we included in vitro transcribed and translated Citrine-HA.All three AtADR1s CC R domains and the AtRPM1 CC domain directly interacted with phospholipids carrying polyacidic headgroups and hence, bound to all PIPs and PA (Fig. 6a-d).For the AtADR1s CC R domains we additionally observed a weak interaction with the anionic and low abundant PS (Fig. 6a-c) (Colin & Jaillais, 2020).We also  New Phytologist detected a very weak interaction of Citrine-HA to PIPs, but much weaker than observed for the AtADR1s CC R and AtRPM1 CC domains (Fig. 6e).These results suggest a strong binding of the AtADR1s and AtRPM1 CC R /CC domains to negatively charged polyacidic phospholipids most likely via an electrostatic interaction.

PI(4,5)P 2 depletion has no impact on PM localization and cell death function of AtADR1s and AtRPM1
The strong effect of PI4P depletion at the PM on the function and localization of AtADR1s and AtRPM1 and the specific interaction of their CC R /CC domains with anionic lipids (including  ) in vitro, suggest that PI4P plays a major role for their interaction with and consequently, for their function at the PM.PI (4,5)P 2 fulfils similar important cellular functions, is specifically found at the plant PM, and is also required for the PM association of many proteins (Doumane et al., 2020), like the mammalian MLKL protein (Dondelinger et al., 2014;Quarato et al., 2016).However, PI(4,5)P 2 is not required for plant PM electronegativity (Simon et al., 2016).Our observation of the additional direct binding of the AtADR1s CC R and AtRPM1 CC domains to PI(4,5)P 2 (Fig. 6), prompted us to test whether PI(4,5)P 2 is also required for AtADR1s and AtRPM1 PM localization and cell death function.We co-expressed the PManchored WT PI(4,5)P 2 5-phosphatase domain from the Drosophila OCRL protein (dOCRL WT ) that specifically depletes the PI(4,5)P 2 pool at the plant PM (Doumane et al., 2020) with AtADR1, AtADR1-L1, AtADR1-L2, AtRPM1 and AtRPS5.As a control we co-expressed a phosphatase dead mutant version of dOCRL (dOCRL dead ) that is catalytically inactive (Doumane et al., 2020).Co-expression of dOCRL WT or dOCRL dead with AtADR1s, AtRPM1 and AtRPS5 had no visible effect on their (PM-) localization or protein accumulation (Figs S4c,d,S8).Coexpression of dOCRL WT , but not of the catalytically inactive dOCRL dead , with the cell death-inducing CC R domains of AtADR1, AtADR1-L2 and AtNRG1.1 did not inhibit their activity and a cell death induction was visible for all three CC R domains (Fig. S9a-c).Similarly, depleting the PI(4,5)P 2 pool from the PM did not affect AtADR1 and AtADR1 DV -induced cell death responses (Fig. S9d,e).Further, we found no inhibition of the cell death activity of AtRPM1 or AtRPS5 in either the presence of dOCRL WT or dOCRL dead (Figs S4f, S6c, S9f).Consistent with the fact that PI(4,5)P 2 depletion does not affect AtRNL and AtRPM1-mediated cell death, we also did not observe a negative effect on protein accumulation by PM PI(4,5) P 2 depletion (Figs S8, S9).This suggests that AtRNLs, AtRPM1 and AtRPS5 PM localization and their PM-coupled cell death function is independent of PI(4,5)P 2 .
Collectively, this demonstrates that PI(4,5)P 2 is likely not a major contributor for AtADR1s, AtRPM1 and AtRPS5 localization and function at the PM.

Discussion
Upon effector-induced activation, the CNL AtZAR1 oligomerizes and translocates to the PM where it forms a pore-like structure via the alpha 1 helix of its CC domain that acts as a cation selective channel to induce a cell death and immune response (Wang et al., 2019a,b;Bi et al., 2021).PM or endomembrane localization was shown to be necessary for the cell death and immune function of many CNLs (Gao et al., 2011;Engelhardt et al., 2012).Some CNLs localize to membranes via N-terminal myristoylation and/or palmitoylation, and the residues required for this post-translational modification were demonstrated to be important for the function of these CNLs (Qi et al., 2012;Kawano et al., 2014).However, the molecular mechanism underlying the localization of nonacylated PM/membrane-localized NLRs remains elusive.We present data that suggests a model in which AtADR1s and the CNL AtRPM1 require PI4P at the PM for proper localization that is required for protein stability and cell death function upon (auto-)activation (Fig. 7).The localization is most likely regulated by direct binding of their CC/CC R domains to anionic lipids (including the very abundant PI4P), possibly via positive charges in a basic hydrophobic stretch that we found in all the CC/CC R domains (Fig. S10).We, however, cannot rule out the possibility that other mechanisms and/or domains are also required, for example the interaction with other (structural) lipids or integral membrane proteins.In this context, it has recently been shown that AtADR1s interact with a member of the receptor-like kinase family (Pruitt et al., 2021).However, the strong effect of PI4P depletion from the PM on NLR localization and function, suggests that PI4P contributes significantly to AtADR1s and AtRPM1 PM localization.By contrast, PI4P does not or only marginally contribute to the PM localization of CNLs with myristoylation or acylation motifs, such as AtRPS5 (Fig. S4), and hence PI4P depletion does not affect their function.
Interestingly, recent studies demonstrated that there is a reduction in the PI4P levels and a specific enrichment of PI( 4 Qin et al., 2020;Rausche et al., 2020).The PI(4,5)P 2 enrichment at the EHM and EIHM is an essential susceptibility factor, which is most likely pathogen-induced and requires the function of the host phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinases (PIP5K) (Shimada et al., 2019;Qin et al., 2020).It is possible that the depletion of PI4P and the simultaneous enrichment of PI(4,5) P 2 at these host-pathogen interfaces result in a reduced accumulation of immune-regulatory proteins, for example NLRs, by removing possible binding sites and/or enhancing endocytosis of immune signalling components (Qin et al., 2020).Plants however have evolved means to counteract this potentially pathogen/effector-induced enrichment of PI(4,5)P 2 by downregulating the activity of PIP5Ks or upregulating the activity of phosphoinositide 5-phosphatases upon pathogen perception by cellsurface localized immune receptors (Menzel et al., 2019;Rausche et al., 2020).Recently, it was also shown that members of the AtRPW8 protein family specifically localize to the EHM (Berkey et al., 2017), and that the solanaceous helper NLR NRC4 (NLR REQUIRED FOR CELL DEATH 4) dynamically associates with the EHM during P. infestans infection (Duggan et al., 2021), indicating that at least the RPW8/HR proteins and NRC4 may not require PI4P for membrane localization.Thus, actively changing or adjusting the lipid and protein composition and homeostasis of the plant PM is part of the evolutionary arms race between the host and the pathogen.This indicates the importance of the regulation/manipulation of lipid homeostasis and the associated changes in protein localization/stability in this battle.
Likewise, a correlation between the lipid composition of the PM and immunity as well as NLR (CNL) function and stability and an important function for phospholipase-dependent signalling in immunity was previously reported (Andersson et al., 2006;Bargmann & Munnik, 2006;Johansson et al., 2014;Yuan et al., 2018;Schloffel et al., 2020).Plant phospholipase families C (PLCs) and D (PLDs) are involved in many aspects of abiotic and biotic stress responses (Hong et al., 2016).However, the exact mechanisms of how these enzymes and their product(s) influence immunity are not well understood (Li & Wang, 2019).Perception of pathogen-derived danger signals by NLRs and cellsurface localized pathogen-recognition receptors (PRRs) lead to the rapid activation and recruitment of PLDs and PLCs to pathogen entry sites at the PM as well as a biphasic transient calcium ion (Ca 2+ ) influx (Johansson et al., 2014;Xing et al., 2019;Schloffel et al., 2020;Bi et al., 2021;Jacob et al., 2021).PLDs and PLCs induce the production of inositol polyphosphates, PA and diacylglycerol (DAG), all of which can function as second messengers during immunity as well as other stress responses (Li & Wang, 2019).The PLC-and PLD-mediated generation of PA is required for NLR-triggered reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and HR-like cell death, and external application of PA is sufficient to induce a cell death response and the transcriptional activation of the pathogen-responsive PR1 promoter (Andersson et al., 2006).The cation (Ca 2+ )-channel forming capability of some CNLs and RNLs at membranes is required for their cell death activity and downstream immune signalling (Jubic et al., 2019;Wang et al., 2020b;Bi et al., 2021;Jacob et al., 2021).In light of our results it is tempting to hypothesize that (1) AtADR1s interact with PM/membrane anionic lipids, like PI4P, and that activation might lead to oligomerization (or at least stabilization of a higher order complex), and the formation of a cation-permeable channel/pore that (2) results in a transient Ca 2+ influx and subsequently, in the (3) activation of Ca 2+ -dependent and probably NLR-interacting phospholipases that (4) in turn produce lipid messengers, such as and DAG, which (5) might participate in the activation of downstream signalling components required for (6) NLR-mediated immune responses (Fig. S11) (Andersson et al., 2006;Yuan et al., 2018;Jubic et al., 2019;Wang et al., 2019a;Bi et al., 2021;Jacob et al., 2021).

ÓFig. 1
Fig. 1 AtADR1 proteins mainly localize to the plasma membrane (PM).Single plane secant views showing that AtADR1 proteins (ADR1, ADR1-L1, ADR1-L2) and auto-activated QHD (DV) mutants localize mainly to the PM, whereas the AtADR1 P-loop (AAA) mutants additionally display cytosolic and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) localization.The indicated ADR1 proteins fused to Citrine-HA or EYFP were transiently co-expressed with the PM-resident protein BRI1-mRFP in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves and confocal imaging was done at 4 h (a, b, c, f) or 5 h (i) post-estradiol induction or 2 d postinfiltration (d, e, g, h).Localization of ADR1s is shown with the first column (Citrine/YFP, in yellow) and the co-localized PM-localized BRI1 is shown in the second column (RFP, in magenta).Chloroplasts are shown in the third column (chlorophyll A, in cyan) and the merged images are shown in the fourth column (merge).Fluorescence intensities were measured along the dotted line depicted in the merge images.Bars, 20 µm; n, nucleus.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Homo-hetero-association of AtADR1 proteins.Characterization of the wild-type (WT), P-loop (AAA) and QHD (DV) variants of AtADR1 proteins.(a) Transient expression of steady-state (WT), P-loop mutant (AAA) or auto-activated mutant (DV) AtADR1s-Citrine-HA fusion proteins in Nicotiana benthamiana.Photographs were taken under ultraviolet (UV) light at 23 h post-estradiol induction and 47 h post-infiltration.White/light grey areas correspond to dead leaf tissue.Numbers represent the number of leaves showing cell death out of the number of leaves analysed.Asterisk indicates weak cell death.Double-asterisk indicates very weak cell death.Images of the same leaves under normal light are shown in Supporting Information Fig. S3.(b) Immunoblot analysis of the transiently expressed proteins (see (a)) using anti-GFP antibody.Equal loading of the proteins is indicated by the Rubisco band from the Ponceau staining (PS).Proteins were extracted 3 h post-estradiol induction.(c, d) AtADR1 proteins form both homo-dimers (c) and hetero-dimers (d).The indicated proteins were transiently co-expressed in N. benthamiana and leaf tissue was harvested 3 h post-estradiol induction.Total proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP beads and immunoblotted with anti-GFP and anti-RFP antibody, respectively.Immunoblots using total proteins before immunoprecipitation are shown as input (upper panel) and immunoprecipitated proteins are shown as IP (lower panel).Equal loading of the proteins is indicated by the Rubisco band from the PS.Co-immunoprecipitation was repeated two times with similar results.For ADR1 WT /ADR1-L1 WT interaction, ADR1 WT -Cit-HA from the flow-through is shown as input since we were not able to detect it in the input fraction.ADR1 DV , ADR1 D461V ; ADR1-L1 DV , ADR1-L1 D489V ; ADR1-L2 DV , ADR1-L2 D484V ; ADR1 AAA , ADR1 212AAA214 ; ADR1-L1 AAA , ADR1-L1 212AAA214 ; ADR1-L2 AAA , ADR1-L2 212AAA214 ; IP, immunoprecipitation.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate (PI4P) depletion reduces plasma membrane (PM) localization and stability of AtADR1s and AtRPM1.Effects on the localization and stability of AtADR1s (ADR1, ADR1-L1, ADR1-L2) and AtRPM1 after transient co-expression with SAC1 dead (upper panel) or SAC1 WT (lower panel).(a) MAP-mCherry-SAC1 WT co-expression affects ADR1-Citrine-HA PM localization but not its endoplasmic reticulum localization.(c, e, g) ADR1-L1-, ADR1-L2-and RPM1-EYFP fluorescence is not (c, g) or only weakly (e) detectable when co-expressed with MAP-mCherry-SAC1 WT .Fusion proteins were transiently expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves and confocal imaging was done at 4 h after estradiol induction (a), 2 d postinfiltration (c, e) or 24 h post-infiltration (g).Localization of ADR1-Citrine-HA and ADR1-L1-, ADR1-L2-and RPM1-EYFP proteins is shown in the first column (Citrine/YFP, in yellow) and MAP-mCherry-SAC1 WT or MAP-mCherry-SAC1 dead is shown in the second column (mCherry, in magenta).Chloroplasts are shown in the third column (chlorophyll A, in cyan) and the merged images are shown in the fourth column.Images are single plane secant views.Bar, 20 µm.(b) Immunoblot analysis indicates a slightly reduced accumulation of ADR1-Citrine-HA after co-expression with MAP-mCherry-SAC1 WT compared to co-expression with MAP-mCherry-SAC1 dead .(d, f, h) Co-expression of ADR1-L1 (d), ADR1-L2 (f) and RPM1 (h) -EYFP with MAP-mCherry-SAC1 WT severely affects their stability.Immunoblot analysis of the transiently expressed proteins (see (a), (c), (e), (g)) using anti-GFP and anti-RFP antibody, respectively, are shown.Equal loading of the proteins is indicated by the Rubisco band from the Ponceau staining (PS).Numbers show quantification of band intensities normalized to the Rubisco band from the PS.Protein samples were collected at 4 h after estradiol induction (b), 2 d postinfiltration (d, f) or 24 h post-infiltration (h).

Fig. 4
Fig. 4 MAP-mCherry-SAC1 strongly affects AtADR1s and AtRPM1 cell death activity.Cell death activity of full-length AtADR1 and the autoactive AtADR1 DV mutant, the phospho-mimic T7-RIN4 T166D activated RPM1 as well as the autoactive AtADR1s CC R domains (ADR1 CC R and ADR1-L2 CC R ), is suppressed by SAC1 WT co-expression.(a-f, upper panels) Transient expression of ADR1 (a), ADR1 D461V (b), phospho-mimic T7-RIN4 T166D (RIN4 TD )activated RPM1 (c), ADR1 CC R (d), ADR1-L2 CC R (e) and NRG1.1 CC R (f) Citrine-HA-or EYFP-fusion proteins in Nicotiana benthamiana co-expressed with MAP-mCherry-SAC1 WT or MAP-mCherry-SAC1 dead .Images of leaves were taken under ultraviolet (UV) light at 8 h post-estradiol induction (a), 30 h post-infiltration (hpi) (b), 24 hpi (c), 23 hpi (d), 26 hpi (e) and 28 hpi (f).Phospho-mimic T7-RIN4 T116D was co-expressed to activate RPM1.White/light grey areas on the leaves indicate dead tissue.Numbers represent the number of leaves showing cell death out of the number of leaves analysed.Asterisk indicates weak cell death.(a-f, lower panels), Immunoblot analysis of the transiently expressed proteins (see upper panels) using anti-GFP and anti-RFP antibody, respectively.Membranes were horizontally cut into two pieces and probed with anti-GFP or anti-RFP antibody, respectively (a-c).Equal loading of the proteins is indicated by the Rubisco band from the Ponceau staining (PS).Numbers show quantification of band intensities normalized to the Rubisco band from the Ponceau staining.Protein samples were collected at 24 hpi (a), 4 h post-estradiol induction (b), 22 hpi (c) or 20 hpi (d-f).

Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate (PI4P) depletion affects plasma membrane (PM) localization of AtADR1 CC R domains.Co-expression of SAC1 WT noticeably affects ADR1 CC R (a), ADR1-L1 CC R (b) and ADR1-L2 CC R (c) localization.(a-c) Citrine-HA tagged AtADR1 (ADR1, ADR1-L1, ADR1-L2) CC R domains were transiently co-expressed with MAP-mCherry-SAC1 dead (upper panels) or MAP-mCherry-SAC1 WT (lower panels) in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves and confocal imaging was done at 3 h (a) or 4 h (b, c) post-estradiol induction.MAP-mCherry-SAC1 WT induces ADR1 CC R , ADR1-L1 CC R and ADR1-L2 CC R re-localization to intracellular puncta, most likely endosomes (white arrowheads in lower panels of a-c).Localization of ADR1 CC R -Cit-HA domains is shown with the first column (Citrine, in yellow) and MAP-mCherry-SAC1 dead or MAP-mCherry-SAC1 WT is shown in the second column (mCherry, in magenta).Chloroplasts are shown in the third column (chlorophyll A, in cyan) and the merged images are shown in the fourth column (merge).Images are single plane secant views.Bar, 20 µm.

Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Proposed model of AtADR1s and the CNL RPM1 localization and cell death/resistance function at the plasma membrane (PM).Localization of the RNLs AtADR1, AtADR1-L1 and AtADR1-L2 and nonacylated CNLs, here shown for AtRPM1, to the PM is mediated by a direct interaction of their CC R or CC domains with anionic lipids, of which phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate (PI4P) is the most abundant at the plant PM.(a) Expression of catalytically inactive and forced PM-localized MAP-SAC1 dead does not affect AtADR1s, myristoylated (AtRPS5) or nonacylated CNL (AtRPM1) PM localization, and consequently also not their cell death activity upon (auto-)activation.(b) MAP-SAC1 WT -mediated PI4P depletion from the PM severely affects AtADR1s and nonacylated CNL AtRPM1, but not myristoylated CNL AtRPS5, localization.The decreased PI4P levels strongly affect PM electronegativity and this leads to a loss of binding to the PM and rapid degradation of AtADR1s and the nonacylated CNL AtRPM1.The reduced accumulation of AtADR1s and AtRPM1 in the cell consequently leads to loss of AtADR1s-and AtRPM1-mediated cell death induction.(c) The localization of AtADR1s CC R domains (ADR1 CC R , ADR1-L1 CC R , ADR1-L2 CC R ) is not affected by MAP-SAC1 dead expression, similar to full-length AtADR1s.Thus, there is no observable effect on CC R domain autoactivity (cell death induction).(d) PI4P depletion by MAP-SAC1 WT expression causes a re-localization of the AtADR1s CC R domains to intracellular puncta, probably endosomal compartments as their membranes might exhibit the highest electronegativity when MAP-SAC1 WT is expressed.This mis-or relocalization of AtADR1s CC R domains does not lead to their degradation.However, AtADR1s CC R cell death activity is severely reduced.