Hepatitis C treatment hesitancy among people with heroin dependence in Australia. A prospective cohort study

The World Health Organization aims to eliminate hepatitis C as a health problem by 2030.1 Injecting drug use is the main risk factor for hepatitis C in Australia.2 The introduction of highly effective and well tolerated antiviral therapies led to an early surge in treatment (33 200 people during 2016) that has since ebbed (8100 during 2020).1 It is estimated that 40– 45% of Australians who need treatment have received it.1 Explanations for the decline in the number treated include low engagement with the medical system, the falling prevalence of hepatitis C, and ambivalence about treatment related to lack of trust in medical staff, fear of side effects, and competing social and health priorities, especially for people with asymptomatic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections.3


Research letter
Hepatitis C treatment hesitancy among people with heroin dependence in Australia. A prospective cohort study Chris Tremonti 1,2,3 , Maree Teesson 4 , Christina Marel 4 , Katherine Mills 4 , Paul S Haber 2 T he World Health Organization aims to eliminate hepatitis C as a health problem by 2030. 1 Injecting drug use is the main risk factor for hepatitis C in Australia. 2 The introduction of highly effective and well tolerated antiviral therapies led to an early surge in treatment (33 200 people during 2016) that has since ebbed (8100 during 2020). 1 It is estimated that 40-45% of Australians who need treatment have received it. 1 Explanations for the decline in the number treated include low engagement with the medical system, the falling prevalence of hepatitis C, and ambivalence about treatment related to lack of trust in medical staff, fear of side effects, and competing social and health priorities, especially for people with asymptomatic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. 3 The Australian Treatment Outcome Study (ATOS), the largest and longest cohort study of people with heroin dependence in Australia, has followed 615 people since 2001. Participants have since been followed up at six time points, most recently 18-20 years after recruitment. 4 At the most recent follow-up, we invited a convenience sample of 130 participants to attend Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH) in Sydney during 1 September 2019 -30 April 2021 for physical health assessments, including taking of a medical history, physical examination, and blood tests. Prior to being tested for HCV infection, participants were asked about their hepatitis C status, their most recent visit to a primary health care provider, whether they had a regular primary health care provider, and whether their regular provider was their opioid treatment program prescriber. Serum samples were tested for anti-HCV antibodies; if positive, polymerase chain reaction testing for HCV RNA was undertaken. Hepatitis C status was defined as active (HCV RNA-positive) or past infection (HCV RNA-negative, anti-HCV antibody-positive), not exposed (anti-HCV antibody-negative), or unknown. All participants also underwent liver elastography, and liver stiffness was graded according to Australian guidelines. 5 Participants were informed of their positive hepatitis C status either directly (by telephone) or via letters to their primary Of the 130 invited ATOS participants who consented to HCV testing (95%), blood was successfully collected from 124. A total of 99 people had been exposed to HCV (80%): 25 had active hepatitis (none of whom had sought treatment), 73 had infections that had since resolved, and the HCV RNA status of one participant could not be determined. As 57 of participants with past infections had been treated (78%), 57 of the 99 people exposed to HCV had been treated (58%); past infections in sixteen people had apparently resolved without treatment (Box 1, Box 2).
Seventeen of 25 people with active HCV infections (68%) were aware of their status prior to testing, including eight in opioid treatment programs (32%), which require at least quarterly reviews by a prescribing clinician. 6 Liver elastography indicated cirrhosis in two people with active infections, and fibrosis in four others.
Twenty-three of 25 people with active HCV infections (92%) or (in eighteen cases) their general practitioners could be contacted to inform them about their status. Fourteen of 25 people (56%) did not commence treatment during the two years following testing, including eleven of the seventeen aware of their infection prior to testing. HCV infection had cleared in four of the eleven people who did commence treatment, which was prescribed by their opioid treatment program prescriber (four participants), general practitioner (five), or study doctor (one); one participant was not contacted about their status, but had commenced treatment in prison. Five of the eight people who had been unaware of their HCV infections commenced antiviral therapy within two years, including all three who did not believe they were infected.
At the time of HCV testing, 100 of 130 participants had seen their primary health care practitioner during the preceding six months (77%). The median time from medical review was similar for people with (30 days; interquartile range [IQR], 18-277 days) or without active hepatitis C infections (31 days; IQR, 12-151 days). The likelihood of active hepatitis C was higher for participants who did not have regular general practitioners or whose primary physician was their opioid treatment program prescriber than for those with regular general practitioners who were not their opioid treatment program prescribers (15 of 51 [29%] v 10 of 79 [13%]; OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-7.0).
The hepatitis C treatment rate (59%) we report exceeds the estimated overall rate among people in Australia with HCV infections (40-45%). 7 All but two participants with active hepatitis C infections, or their general practitioners, had been informed about their status, but treatment may not have been initiated because of general practitioner uncertainty about treatment, or because the participant did not see their primary health care practitioner after testing. However, the fact that fourteen of 25 people with active infections did not commence treatment within two years, including eleven who had been aware of their status prior to testing, suggests that treatment hesitancy may be a factor in reducing treatment rates.
In conclusion, testing people at risk of HCV infection should be better integrated into opioid treatment programs 4 if eradication is to be achieved by 2030.