Journal list menu
Editor: Alex Anstey, Bangor, UK
About This Journal
British Journal of Dermatology, the official journal of British Association of Dermatologists, publishes evidence-based dermatology, clinical trials, epidemiology, qualitative and outcomes research and translational research. A high impact international journal publishing the highest quality dermatological research that advances the understanding, management and treatment of skin disease. BJD publishes clinical and experimental research spanning a wealth of dermatological disciplines and delivers plain language summaries for patients.
Featured in British Journal of Dermatology
Articles
-
more >
A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, phase II trial of baricitinib for systemic lupus erythematosus: how to optimize lupus trials to examine effects on cutaneous lupus erythematosus
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  964-965
-  26 April 2019
Azathioprine: friend or foe?
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  961-963
-  26 April 2019
Image gallery: Oleoma after self‐injections of anabolic steroids
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  e140-e140
-  26 April 2019
Keratoderma and woolly hair: an important clue for the presence of cardiac pathology
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  983-984
-  26 April 2019
Abstract
Linked Article: Maruthappu et al. Br J Dermatol 2019; 180:1114–1122.
-
The following is a list of the most cited articles based on citations published in the last three years, according to CrossRef.
more >free accessA systematic review of worldwide incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  1069-1080
-  17 January 2012
Variability in the clinical pattern of cutaneous side‐effects of drugs with systemic symptoms: does a DRESS syndrome really exist?
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  609-611
-  18 January 2007
free accessDrug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): an original multisystem adverse drug reaction. Results from the prospective RegiSCAR study
- S.H. Kardaun
- P. Sekula
- L. Valeyrie‐Allanore
- Y. Liss
- C.Y. Chu
- D. Creamer
- A. Sidoroff
- L. Naldi
- M. Mockenhaupt
- J.C. Roujeau
- for the RegiSCAR study group
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  1071-1080
-  16 July 2013
Abstract
What's already known about this topic?
- DRESS is a hypersensitivity reaction, characterized by a variable combination of symptomatic and asymptomatic features.
What does this study add?
- DRESS is an original phenotype among severe cutaneous adverse reactions in terms of clinical and biological characteristics, drugs, time relation, and course.
- Besides eosinophilia, other haematological abnormalities are frequent.
- The diversity of causative drugs is rather limited.
- The prodromal period is quite variable, introducing risk of protopathic bias, especially for antibiotics and NSAIDs.
Skin microbiota: a source of disease or defence?
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  442-455
-  11 February 2008
-
free access
Facial hyperpigmentation: causes and treatment
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  41-56
-  4 October 2013
Abstract
What's already known about this topic?
- In the skin of colour population, facial hyperpigmentation is a common and growing concern when presenting to the physician.
- Facial hyperpigmentation can cause significant cosmetic disfigurement with subsequent emotional impact. Therapy continues to be challenging as there is no universally effective treatment. Existing agents have varying degrees of efficacy and potential risk of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation with different treatment protocols.
What does this study add?
- Persons of colour will soon comprise a majority of the international and domestic populations.
- A comprehensive knowledge and approach to assessment and treatment is necessary to care properly for skin of colour patients.
- This review thoroughly discusses aetiologies of facial hyperpigmentation and categorizes appropriate treatment strategies.
free accessBritish Association of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of lichen sclerosus, 2018
- F.M. Lewis
- F.M. Tatnall
- S.S. Velangi
- C.B. Bunker
- A. Kumar
- F. Brackenbury
- M.F. Mohd Mustapa
- L.S. Exton
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  839-853
-  4 January 2018
Abstract
Linked Comment: Akel and Fuller. Br J Dermatol 2018; 178:823–824.
Plain language summary available online
free accessBritish Association of Dermatologists guidelines for biologic therapy for psoriasis 2017
- C.H. Smith
- Z.K. Jabbar‐Lopez
- Z.Z. Yiu
- T. Bale
- A.D. Burden
- L.C. Coates
- M. Cruickshank
- T. Hadoke
- E. MacMahon
- R. Murphy
- C. Nelson‐Piercy
- C.M. Owen
- R. Parslew
- E. Peleva
- E. Pottinger
- E.J. Samarasekera
- J. Stoddart
- C. Strudwicke
- V. A. Venning
- R.B. Warren
- L.S. Exton
- M.F. Mohd Mustapa
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  628-636
-  17 May 2017
Abstract
Plain language summary available online
free accessEpidemiology of acne vulgaris
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  474-485
-  4 December 2012
Abstract
What’s already known about this topic?
- •
Acne is a common disease affecting all to a degree, manifesting in adolescence with significant psychosocial and socioeconomic consequences.
What does this study add?
- •
This review elucidates the risk factors for the development of and severity of acne vulgaris leading to improved understanding.
- •
We highlight the need for universal outcome measures and important areas such as the natural history of acne and relationship between foodstuffs and acne where more high‐quality studies would be valuable.
Open accessRosacea treatment update: recommendations from the global ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) panel
- M. Schaller
- L.M.C. Almeida
- A. Bewley
- B. Cribier
- N.C. Dlova
- G. Kautz
- M. Mannis
- H.H. Oon
- M. Rajagopalan
- M. Steinhoff
- D. Thiboutot
- P. Troielli
- G. Webster
- Y. Wu
- E. van Zuuren
- J. Tan
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  465-471
-  12 November 2016
Abstract
What's already known about this topic?
- The current subtype‐led rosacea diagnosis/classification system does not adequately cover the spectrum of clinical presentation and has implications for patient management.
- High‐quality controlled trials for rosacea interventions are increasing, but there are still gaps in the evidence and the recommendations in existing guidance are disparate.
- Currently there is no phenotype‐based approach to rosacea management.
What does this study add?
- This international expert panel proposes a phenotype‐led approach to rosacea management that addresses individual rosacea features. It incorporates best evidence, clinical experience and recent developments in the management of patients with rosacea.
- This article provides current ophthalmological expert perspectives on ocular rosacea for a dermatologist audience.
- This article also describes an approach to combination treatment and maintenance therapy of cutaneous rosacea features.
Linked Editorial: Drucker. Br J Dermatol 2017; 176:283–284.
Linked Comment: Egeberg. Br J Dermatol 2017; 176:300–301.
free accessBritish Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for the investigation and management of generalized pruritus in adults without an underlying dermatosis, 2018
- G.W.M. Millington
- A. Collins
- C.R. Lovell
- T.A. Leslie
- A.S.W. Yong
- J.D. Morgan
- T. Ajithkumar
- M.J. Andrews
- S.M. Rushbook
- R.R. Coelho
- S.J. Catten
- K.Y.C. Lee
- A.M. Skellett
- A.G. Affleck
- L.S. Exton
- M.F. Mohd Mustapa
- N.J. Levell
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  34-60
-  22 January 2018
Abstract
Plain language summary available online
Open accessDupilumab with concomitant topical corticosteroid treatment in adults with atopic dermatitis with an inadequate response or intolerance to ciclosporin A or when this treatment is medically inadvisable: a placebo‐controlled, randomized phase III clinical trial (LIBERTY AD CAFÉ)
- M. de Bruin‐Weller
- D. Thaçi
- C.H. Smith
- K. Reich
- M.J. Cork
- A. Radin
- Q. Zhang
- B. Akinlade
- A. Gadkari
- L. Eckert
- T. Hultsch
- Z. Chen
- G. Pirozzi
- N.M.H. Graham
- B. Shumel
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  1083-1101
-  28 November 2017
Abstract
What's already known about this topic?
- Patients with atopic dermatitis that is inadequately controlled with topical therapy have few systemic treatment options.
- Ciclosporin A (CsA) is a systemic immunosuppressant approved for atopic dermatitis in most European countries and Japan, but not all patients respond, and side‐effects limit its use.
- Dupilumab (monoclonal antibody against interleukin‐4 receptor‐alpha) with/without topical corticosteroids (TCS) is approved in the U.S.A. and the European Union for the treatment of adults with inadequately‐controlled moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis.
What does this study add?
- In this 16‐week trial in adults with atopic dermatitis and history of inadequate response or intolerance to CsA, or for whom CsA treatment was medically inadvisable, dupilumab administered weekly or every 2 weeks with concomitant TCS significantly improved signs and symptoms and quality of life, with no new safety signals.
- These data support the use of dupilumab in this difficult‐to‐treat population.
Linked Editorial: Schmitt. Br J Dermatol 2018; 178:992–993.
Linked Letter: Thyssen. Br J Dermatol 2018; 178:1220.
Plain language summary available online
free accessUpdates in lichen sclerosis: British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of lichen sclerosus 2018
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  823-824
-  18 April 2018
Abstract
Linked Article: Lewis et al. Br J Dermatol 2018; 178: 839–853
Open accessEfficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis who have an inadequate response to ustekinumab: results of the randomized, double‐blind, phase III NAVIGATE trial
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  114-123
-  21 June 2017
Abstract
What's already known about this topic?
- Interleukin (IL)‐23/IL‐17 is the major pathway that drives the chronic inflammation underlying the pathophysiology of psoriasis.
- Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting IL‐12 and IL‐23 and is currently approved for patients with plaque psoriasis.
- Guselkumab is a novel anti‐IL‐23 monoclonal antibody and has demonstrated high efficacy in patients with plaque psoriasis in two recent phase III trials.
What does this study add?
- Guselkumab demonstrated greater efficacy compared with ustekinumab among patients who failed to achieve an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 with ustekinumab therapy.
- The types of adverse events (AEs) with guselkumab and ustekinumab were similar, with infections being the most common.
- A slightly higher incidence of AEs was reported in the guselkumab group, primarily driven by AEs of back pain, psoriatic arthropathy and mild injection site reactions.
Linked Comment: Albrecht and Gerdes. Br J Dermatol 2018; 178:20.
Plain language summary available online
free accessA global perspective on the epidemiology of acne
- British Journal of Dermatology
-  3-12
-  17 January 2015
















